Channel
@Dop_org
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
63,644subscribers
-270 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001508749497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dop_org |
| Description | DOP brings selective transparency to Ethereum. DOP allows you to decide what crypto assets and transactions you wish to make public. DOP Official Community: https://t.me/dop_community DOP’s social channels and websites: https://linktr.ee/dop.org |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dop_org |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 63,644 | -44 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 63,688 | -64 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 63,752 | -32 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 63,784 | -47 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 63,831 | -83 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 63,914 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 63,914 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
603 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 174 | 28.9% | |
| 🔥 | 164 | 27.2% | |
| 👍 | 118 | 19.6% | |
| 👏 | 91 | 15.1% | |
| ⚡ | 29 | 4.81% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 3.81% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.663% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 603reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DOP is now part of Kai. The ultimate privacy layer has been absorbed into a unified financial operating system. One account. Fiat, crypto, stocks, and AI-native execution all in real time. The current financial system is structurally fragmented. Fiat banks, crypto exchanges, and brokers operate in isolated silos. Moving value between them is slow, expensive, and inefficient. Kai replaces this friction with a sing…
👍9❤8
To solve the friction of modern finance, privacy cannot live in a vacuum. It must be fully absorbed into the financial execution layer itself. We are looking at a future where traditional currency and digital assets are managed from a unified base, without compromising on-chain confidentiality. We are preparing to expand the scope of what DOP technology powers. Details soon.
👏14❤4👍4🔥2
Only 14% of crypto companies in Europe successfully maintain bank accounts without later closures. The legacy financial system excludes digital asset participants by design. A new standard is necessary. One that unifies traditional fiat and digital assets into a single operational layer, secured by programmable privacy. Financial infrastructure needs to be re-engineered, not just adapted. Watch this space.
❤13👏10
Data ownership was the first step. Capital execution is the next. Moving between traditional currency and digital assets shouldn't require routing through a web of fragmented middlemen. It must happen in a single, unified environment where your financial data remains yours. Privacy protocols are meant to be utilized by broader infrastructure. The architecture is shifting.
👏14❤9
Fiat lives in traditional banks. Digital assets live on-chain. The bridge between them is slow, expensive, and entirely public. This fragmentation isn't just an inconvenience-it's a structural failure. True financial utility requires a unified infrastructure where assets move on command, without exposing your data. The next phase of execution is coming.
👍11👏8❤5
The UI issues on the migration page have now been fully resolved. Everything is functioning as expected. If you encounter anything unusual, please report it to the admins so we can review immediately. Thank you for your patience and support!
👍14❤4
Happy New Year everyone 🎉 Thank you for being part of the DOP journey. Privacy matters - especially as more business moves on-chain. Wishing you a calm, private, and successful year ahead. DOP Team
❤26
It’s here! DOP has a new look with a clearer purpose. This rebrand puts privacy, compliance, and enterprise usability front and center. From “own your data” to “private payments, verifiable proofs”, the new DOP language is user-centric - we focus on the benefits for CFOs, HR teams, auditors and key players in the space. The visual update features lighter ocean blues, soft gradients, clean isometric shapes which ad…
🔥23👍13❤6⚡4💯3👏2
Olá, Lisbon 🇵🇹 Team DOP touches down in Lisbon this Sunday, ahead of Blockchain Confluence Lisbon! If you’re attending and would like to set up a one-to-one with us, send us a DM.
👏13🔥5❤4👍2
⚠️ Scam Alert Beware of fake messages or ads claiming to “reopen migration” or “recover tokens.” The only official source for DOP updates is this channel and https://dop.org. We will never DM you or ask you to connect your wallet elsewhere. Stay safe and always double-check links. DOP MIGRATION IS CLOSED - BEWARE OF SCAMMERS
💯10👍4❤2
$DOP2 is now trading on @@MEXCEnglish, @BitMartExchange, @GemsVIPOfficial, and @WhiteBit. Pick your market and start trading!
🔥17❤4👏4🙏3⚡2💯2
Tier-1 listing ✅ Privacy-first protocol ✅ Community momentum ✅ $DOP2 is live on @MEXCEnglish! 👉 mexc.com/exchange/DOP2_USDT
❤23👍5👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dop_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 152,545 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DOP - Official Announcements” (@Dop_org), 63,644 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dop_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.