Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 86 days, net -2,002. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,783–23,385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Nov 2026, 03:16
21,083
-19
31 Oct 2026, 00:45
21,102
-19
29 Oct 2026, 22:00
21,121
-33
28 Oct 2026, 20:00
21,154
-16
27 Oct 2026, 20:48
21,170
-13
26 Oct 2026, 19:47
21,183
-17
25 Oct 2026, 20:26
21,200
-13
24 Oct 2026, 22:06
21,213
-14
24 Oct 2026, 00:16
21,227
-19
23 Oct 2026, 02:46
21,246
-22
22 Oct 2026, 03:26
21,268
-12
21 Oct 2026, 00:28
21,280
-38
19 Oct 2026, 23:30
21,318
-34
18 Oct 2026, 22:58
21,352
-7
17 Oct 2026, 23:09
21,359
-22
16 Oct 2026, 22:00
21,381
-31
15 Oct 2026, 23:54
21,412
-18
15 Oct 2026, 00:58
21,430
-25
13 Oct 2026, 17:09
21,455
-85
10 Oct 2026, 01:55
21,540
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.8%
avg views ÷ 21,083 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
59 (8 June 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
675
Reactions total
30
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 12:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 55s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
472 reactions across 59 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
222
47.0%
❤
90
19.1%
💯
33
6.99%
⚡
26
5.51%
👀
24
5.08%
👍
16
3.39%
🏆
12
2.54%
❤🔥
10
2.12%
🎉
7
1.48%
🥱
6
1.27%
👏
5
1.06%
🤔
4
0.847%
🫡
4
0.847%
🤷
3
0.636%
🍾
2
0.424%
💩
2
0.424%
😱
2
0.424%
🌚
1
0.212%
🍌
1
0.212%
😁
1
0.212%
1 further kind
1
0.212%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚙️ go-quai v0.56.1 is live ⚙️
Please upgrade and restart your nodes as soon as possible.
What's new:
• Hardens nodes so malformed workshares, transactions, ETXs, and P2P messages can't crash them or stall block processing
• Fixes ETX and $QI consensus edge cases
Upgrade here: github.com/dominant-strategies/go-quai/releases/tag/v0.56.1
New Blip Release
App wallets, simplified
• Each site’s app wallet now comes from your recovery phrase. Reconnect the site and your wallet comes back. No backup fees. Already using one? Hit Migrate to new app wallet setup. One tap. Your old wallet stays on that site’s activity as Legacy until you hide it.
• Activity labels are clearer, and explorer links open explorer.qu.ai.
Qi
• Fixed a bug where part or all of a Q…
We appreciate everyone's input on the numbers around QUAI inflation. This prompted us to look further into our calculations, and one immediate finding was that https://supply.qu.ai incorrectly counted transaction fees within miner payouts as new mining emissions. This overstated the numbers and contributed to the confusion. We're sorry for that.
For the 90 days from July 4–October 1, 2026, Mining Rewards were 112.0M…
⛵️ Pelagus v1.0.62 is here ⛵️
This update improves Qi transaction reliability, makes wallet signing and dApp interactions more dependable, and lets you resume setup if you close the wallet during recovery phrase verification.
Auto-lock timing is improved, with new 1-day, 3-day, and 1-week options in Settings.
To update, simply relaunch your browser. If you run into an issue or have a question, share in Quai Discor…
QUAI is now bridged to BNB Chain ⚡️
The QUAI/USDT pool is live on PancakeSwap V3.
Bridge from BNB Chain through Symbiosis to get native QUAI.
Bridge + token: https://www.qu.ai/bridge
PancakeSwap pool: https://pancakeswap.finance/liquidity/pool/bsc/0x5dD4c03E5e3EE3BA4113241aa01eB256b92eC4AA
Docs: https://docs.qu.ai/learn/bridge-to-quai
Stay tuned for more announcements!
⚡️ Quainance TVL surpasses $140K
More liquidity has been added to the QUAI/USDT pool, bringing total Quainance TVL above $140,000.
Liquidity is growing. Markets are expanding.
Quainance is the new trading hub for scalable Proof-of-Work with smart contracts. ⛏️📈
Explore the pools:
https://www.quainance.com/liquidity
Track Quainance on DeFiLlama:
https://defillama.com/protocol/quainance
🏆4
Signed Alan
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @QuaiNetwork_Announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Omni Network @OmniFDN · 19,167 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 September 2026
Blazpay Announcement @BlazpayAnnouncement · 26,321 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
VERONA Announcements @verona_announcements · 110,576 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Infinite Seas @infiniteseasdev · 44,460 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Cluster Protocol | Announcements @clusterprotocolann · 24,448 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
IguVerse @Iguverse · 18,781 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 October 2026
Prom @prom_ann · 21,312 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
Glacier News @glacier_news · 68,608 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
XDAO | Official channel 💠 @xdaoapp · 1,995,286 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Morph Layer Announcement @MorphL2announcement · 596,537 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Kontos Announcements by Zecrey Labs @ZecreyAnnouncement · 22,392 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
Reality Metaverse @RealityMeta · 40,334 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Web3World Exchange @w3w_exchange · 28,023 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Gopher Announcements📢 @gopherannouncements · 42,709 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Artfi Official Announcements @artfi_announcement · 27,474 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
Allora Network Announcements @alloranetworkannouncements · 50,531 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Study IAS Academy @study_ias_academy · 22,518 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
Aligned Layer @alignedlayer · 19,315 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
The Data Foundation @datafdn · 55,001 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
Galxe @galxe · 154,061 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
BNB Chain @bnbchain · 72,218 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Cultured @cultured_rwa · 63,745 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Quai Network Announcements” (@QuaiNetwork_Announcements), 21,083 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QuaiNetwork_Announcements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.