Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

KUCHER

@StanislavKucher

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,534subscribers

-94 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650430981
TypeChannel
Username@StanislavKucher
DescriptionКанал Станислава Кучера. Журналистика, путешествия, работа над собой. Youtube - - https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCh66SMap82G4fijE4c_V9hw Приобрести КУЧЕР-VPN: https://t.me/kuchervpnbot
Created3 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/StanislavKucher

Growth

31,53431,62831,5815 August 2026 — 31,628 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,628 subscribers6 August 2026 — 31,613 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,592 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,575 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,567 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,555 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,542 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,534 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,520–31,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:2531,534-8
11 Aug 2026, 20:1331,542-13
10 Aug 2026, 17:3831,555-12
9 Aug 2026, 16:2231,567-8
8 Aug 2026, 18:0231,575-17
7 Aug 2026, 20:5231,592-21
6 Aug 2026, 17:3131,613-15
6 Aug 2026, 01:5131,628no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0631,628first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.2%
avg views ÷ 31,534 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held37 (23 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total421,800
Reactions total5,089
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,020
Videos
312
Links
1,560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,730 reactions across 34 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,04443.2%
1,43630.4%
🔥53211.2%
🤬1423.00%
💯1372.90%
🤔721.52%
😢611.29%
💩320.677%
🤯280.592%
😁240.507%
🙏230.486%
👏180.381%
🤮180.381%
🍾170.359%
👎150.317%
🤡150.317%
😍120.254%
🤷120.254%
❤‍🔥110.233%
💊110.233%
15 further kinds701.48%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,089reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,980 views69 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ВСУ заявили о поражении четырех военных кораблей в Новороссийске. Как сообщает ASTRA, речь идет о двух фрегатах, о малом ракетном корабле и о сторожевом катере. Степень повреждений неизвестна, но налицо факт крупнейшей атаки на Новороссийск, куда Россия перевела часть Черноморского флота из Севастополя. И в это время Путин с борта крейсера "Варяг" на Тихом Океане грозит миру мощью российского ВМФ. Скоро начинаю стрим

32🔥23👍8😁5🐳1

12 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈3,430 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026

12 августа 2000 года - российский военный корабль лежит на дне, а только что избранный президент пытается объяснить стране, почему государство оказалось неспособно спасти своих моряков. 12 августа 2026 года - российский президент стоит на военном корабле и вещает стране про мощь флота, в то время как за тысячи километров от него украинские дроны атакуют Новороссийск - базу, куда этот флот был вынужден отступить из С

👍6516🔥7😁3🤮1

11 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC≈4,720 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @metodkucheraPhoto

Друзья, итак, завтра, в среду 12 августа состоится первое занятие курса «Свобода от зависимости». Серия из 8 практических вебинаров с конкретными инструментами и упражнениями, которые помогают избавиться от тяги к алкоголю, сигаретам и другим видам зависимости. Время: Каждую среду с 12 августа по 30 сентября Время: 21:30 Киев/Мск 20:30 Центр. Европа 19:30 Лондон 14:30 Нью-Йорк 11:30 Зап. побережье США Если вы пропу

33👍24🔥3🤮2

11 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC≈4,810 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Скоро начинаю, присоединяйтесь: https://www.youtube.com/live/_LMZFb4yEJA?is=IAUlaAwBuv3RA0Q6 Не забудьте попробовать мой новый VPN: https://t.me/kuchervpnbot 18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЁН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ КУЧЕРОМ СТАНИСЛАВОМ АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА КУЧЕРА СТАНИСЛАВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧА

31👍12👌6🔥3🤔2

11 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈4,950 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На сегодняшний разговор меня вдохновил врач и публицист Андрей Волна, точнее, его открытое письмо Владимиру Кара-Мурзе. В этом письме Андрей, в числе прочего, задает вопрос: стоит ли призывать/советовать новому поколению россиян идти по пути ненасильственного протеста, если этот путь привел предыдущие поколения к проигрышу? Есть фраза, которую власть очень хотела бы услышать от каждого несогласного: "Бесполезно". И

🔥45👍2714🤔7👌2💩1

10 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC≈6,960 views290 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Итак, история с «Яблоком» оказалась не чекистской многоходовкой, а провалом политтехнологического эксперимента. Логика допуска была элементарной: старая либеральная партия, привычные 1-2%, безопасный канал для недовольных, заодно картинка политического разнообразия. По данным «Вёрстки», именно такой вариант поддерживал блок Кириенко: дать "Яблоку" проиграть и тем самым показать маргинальность антивоенной позиции. По

👍143💯5543🔥29🤔8🙏8😁3🤮1

10 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈6,870 views138 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Какими аргументами клеймили тех, кто считал, что голосование за "Яблоко" лучше бойкота "выборов" (в том числе в комментах к моему предыдущему посту? "Чекистская разводка с целью легитимизации", "разводка с целью посчитать несогласных", "разводка с целью показать обществу, насколько ничтожен процент антивоенных россиян". И, конечно - "даже если это не разводка, это тупое бессмысленное действие". Повторю для любителей

🔥63👍3517😢15🙏4💩2💯1🤡1

9 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈6,860 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Через пару минут начинаю, приходите: https://www.youtube.com/live/9736axVRm4I?is=yroufcuueebkhT3Y 18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЁН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ КУЧЕРОМ СТАНИСЛАВОМ АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА КУЧЕРА СТАНИСЛАВА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧА

👍729🔥9💩2🙏2

9 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈7,320 views113 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Путин, похоже, понял главное слабое звено НАТО: чтобы атаковать Альянс, вовсе не обязательно нападать на него так, как он напал на Украину. Можно взрывать, ломать, жечь, запускать дроны, устраивать кибератак - и каждый раз оставлять Западу мучительный вопрос: это уже война или еще нет? Дрон со взрывчаткой у украинского самолета в Германии показывает, насколько далеко может зайти такая стратегия. Сегодня разберу, гд

👍7718😱9🔥4🙏3🖕1🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈8,560 views210 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Окончание, начало выше. Никакой мистики/конспирологии/специальной электоральной операции - просто гэбистская система деградировала настолько, что не просчитала, что ситуация выйдет из под контроля. Были уверены, что "Яблоко", как всегда, соберет погрешность, и начальнику можно будет положить доклад о единстве народа и вождя в деле войны до победного или - потенциально - о готовности воевать хоть со всем Западом. А т

👍126😢3221🤔13🔥8👎5🕊3🤡1

7 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC≈6,400 views197 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Не собирался высказываться на слишком, как мне казалось, очевидную тему - но прочитал вагон эмоциональных постов и комментов в исполнении уважаемых господ, в том числе политологов, изумился и решил написать. Аргументы за бойкот "выборов" в РФ понятны. Выборов там давно нет, результат легко сфальсифицировать. Участие позволяет власти сказать: смотрите, даже наши противники пришли на участки - значит, выборы признали.

👍10361🤔12🔥9👎6💊3👏2😁1

7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈6,290 views78 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Начинаю, присоединяйтесь. Уверен, многие из тех, кто сомневается, как поступить, получат и предельно четкие аргументы за и против, и ясный ответ. И да, эта история не только для россиян и про Россию. https://www.youtube.com/live/i9MaFN3mXVc?is=sqDYhkRXOGxRd_db 18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЁН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ КУЧЕРОМ СТАНИСЛАВОМ АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬ

41👍33🔥3💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @StanislavKucher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 76,397 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Vladimir Pastukhov
@v_pastukhov · 153,971
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KUCHER” (@StanislavKucher), 31,534 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/StanislavKucher.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.