Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 45 days, net -509. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,961–33,622 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:15
33,037
-4
17 Sept 2026, 01:42
33,041
-21
15 Sept 2026, 03:57
33,062
-34
13 Sept 2026, 10:40
33,096
-35
11 Sept 2026, 11:18
33,131
-11
8 Sept 2026, 19:37
33,142
-56
5 Sept 2026, 10:40
33,198
-34
3 Sept 2026, 16:39
33,232
+10
2 Sept 2026, 09:27
33,222
-23
1 Sept 2026, 12:53
33,245
+3
31 Aug 2026, 10:47
33,242
-5
30 Aug 2026, 10:55
33,247
-24
29 Aug 2026, 10:18
33,271
-8
28 Aug 2026, 09:52
33,279
-12
27 Aug 2026, 12:55
33,291
-20
26 Aug 2026, 11:03
33,311
+3
25 Aug 2026, 13:23
33,308
-2
24 Aug 2026, 16:16
33,310
-18
23 Aug 2026, 00:18
33,328
-17
21 Aug 2026, 16:28
33,345
first reading
Engagement
108 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.3%
avg views ÷ 33,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,300
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 108 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
108 (26 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
858,400
Reactions total
28,024
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,190
Videos
≈703
Links
≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 40s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52,910 reactions across 107 posts, in 62 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,737
27.9%
😁
7,489
14.2%
🔥
3,687
6.97%
😢
3,298
6.23%
🤮
2,884
5.45%
🤣
2,759
5.21%
💔
2,310
4.37%
💯
2,190
4.14%
👏
2,159
4.08%
👍
2,048
3.87%
🤡
1,817
3.43%
🙈
1,402
2.65%
💩
1,230
2.32%
🤯
703
1.33%
🤬
675
1.28%
🤔
425
0.803%
💊
405
0.765%
😱
347
0.656%
🙏
331
0.626%
🎃
207
0.391%
42 further kinds
1,807
3.42%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53,342 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
177
across the posts below
Posts paid on
50
of 108 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vsyatakayamongayt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У Зеленского состоялось короткое общение с российскими журналистами. После очередного издевательского комментария Пескова, что с Зеленским Путин будет встречаться только в Москве и никак иначе.
- Когда в Москву , Владимир Александрович?
- На ракете , **
Собираем темы для программы Drama Queens. Что вы хотите, чтобы мы обсудили в новом выпуске?
Пишите здесь в комментариях.
И смотрите Drama Queens утром в субботу.
Вадик Такменев пишет, что умер Сергей Соседов -необычный для российского телевизора персонаж ,сделавший имя еще в Акулах пера. Так и оставшийся в амплуа манерного и не слишком доброжелательного фрика, критика и обожателя звезд. Говорят , упал с лестницы.
Российский кинематограф создаёт очередной шедевр — но, надо сказать, смелый
Изобразить на постере карикатурного Кадырова с ослиными ушами — это, определенно, смелость)
интересно, как прокат пройдет в Чечне (может, как раз всех обяжут сходить в кино в знак почтения)
Вчера стало известно, что сын супермодели Синди Кроуфорд, 27-летний Пресли Гербер, умер в реабилитационной клинике. Таблоиды называют предварительную причину смерти: передозировка запрещенными веществами. Нас эта новость потрясла, как и весь мир. Молодой и красивый ребенок знаменитых родителей, у которого, казалось бы, всё есть, погибает после многолетней борьбы с зависимостями и ментальными проблемами.
Это бесконеч…
Вчера в полубольном состоянии добрела до первой посмертной выставки Кусамы. Она умерла 14 августа и сразу были распроданы билеты на амстердамскую ретроспективную выставку. Пропустить невозможно. Весь музей Стеделяйк в ее веселой ветрянке. Хотя для самой Яёи Кусамы ничего веселого в ней не было. Галлюцинации ее посещали с детства , мир покрывался то злыми красными цветами, то точками. На выставке есть ее детская рабо…
Вячеслав Володин набирает 99 процентов голосов. Даже у Кадырова -97. Получается, Володина россияне любят больше всех. Больше, чем Путина, больше, чем Родину. Это даже не любовь , это обожание, любовное помешательство , ведь он такой , такой… Какой? Напишите в комментариях, за что вы любите Володина, пожалуйста.
Яблоко набирает 6 процентов в Новгородской области. Это означает , что партию не ликвидируют. Кто бы мог представить еще совсем недавно, что мы так будем сопереживать Яблоку.
Вадим Востров рапортует с конференции Сколково. Будущее здесь. «Больше всего понравилось выступление одного из профессоров: «Рубен Варданян создал лучшую бизнес-школу России, а Вадим Мошкович лучшую частую школу «Летово».
Так вышло, что оба они сейчас в тюрьме, но мы о них помним».
Согласитесь, звучит вдохновляюще!»
Прекрасная история в московских театрах, где сотрудников обязуют голосовать, желательно электронно, кнутом и пряником . В МХТ им Чехова рассылают письмо Хабенского. В Сатириконе терминал для электронного голосования поставили даже в театре, а заместитель директора ( процитирую подписчика) «спрашивает ходили ли мы на выборы. Говорят, если не проголосуем, то снимут бронь от мобилизации.»
💩133😁56🤯37😢16❤15🤮15🤡10👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @vsyatakayamongayt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا @moscowtimes_ru · 126,460#52
Война с Ордой. Сергей Ауслендер @voinasordoy · 200,967#53
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Вестник Мракобеса @nikabelonika · 66,859 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Зинаида Пронченко @ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,324 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 August 2026
ЗАХАРОВ @zakharovchannel · 30,145 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
ШЕПЕЛИН @ilyashepelin · 45,545 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
БОЖЕНА @bozhenabozhenabozhena · 65,740 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Беляков @bellochkin · 28,978 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 9 September 2026
Александр Роднянский @alexander_rodnyansky · 42,932 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Дмитрий Львович Быков @dmibykov · 40,355 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
А поговорить? | Ирина Шихман @apogovoritofficial · 45,004 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
Илья Яшин @yashin_russia · 136,933 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Скажи Гордеевой @skazhigordeevoy · 112,642 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
KUCHER @StanislavKucher · 31,151 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Leonid Nevzlin @leonidnevzlin · 42,376 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 August 2026
Дождь | Новости @tvrain · 460,824 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Таня Ф. @tanya_f · 21,201 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 September 2026
Пархомбюро @sparkhomenkovoice · 28,674 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Faridaily @faridaily24 · 63,127 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Антон Долин @anton_dolin · 51,692 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
ПЕВЧИХ @mariapevchikh · 22,843 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Альфред Кох @AlfredKochBayern · 42,046 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
Новая газета Европа @novaya_europe · 115,689 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
ЭХО / Новости @echoonline_news · 72,634 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Белковский @SBelkovskiy · 67,474 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 August 2026
Котрикадзе иностранных дел @k_kotrikadze · 21,776 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 53 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vsya takaya Mongayt” (@vsyatakayamongayt), 33,037 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vsyatakayamongayt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.