Вот так наблюдали полное солнечное затмение в испанском городе Кастрохерисе. Хотелось бы оказаться там 😨
❤127🔥58🤓14

Channel
@serch
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,533,651subscribers
-29,495 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002829561399 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @serch |
| Created | 4 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/serch |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @serch/694 · this entry11 Sept 2025, 08:12 UTC | @technomedia/643411 Sept 2025, 08:25 UTC | 1.00 | 13 minutes |
| @serch/745 · this entry13 Sept 2025, 16:49 UTC | @technomedia/650113 Sept 2025, 17:24 UTC | 1.00 | 35 minutes |
| @serch/1037 · this entry4 Oct 2025, 13:35 UTC | @technomedia/69654 Oct 2025, 13:39 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @serch/1303 · this entry22 Oct 2025, 15:19 UTC | @technomedia/742422 Oct 2025, 15:30 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| @serch/1605 · this entry13 Nov 2025, 12:19 UTC | @technomedia/796413 Nov 2025, 12:23 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @serch/1797 · this entry28 Nov 2025, 13:32 UTC | @technomedia/832528 Nov 2025, 13:51 UTC | 1.00 | 19 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @technomedia | 30 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 8 minutes | this entry (24–6) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,770 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2025 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
On 3 of the 64 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0072 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /49576 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC | 40 minutes | 14,700 → 17,800at least +3,000 | 89 → 91at most +3 | +21.6 |
| /49586 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC | 55 minutes | 15,800 → 21,400at least +5,500 | 75 → 81at most +7 | +39.6 |
| /49617 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC | 50 minutes | 17,400 → 20,400at least +2,900 | 149 → 153at most +5 | +20.9 |
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 1,533,651 | +2,195 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 1,531,456 | -4,837 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 1,536,293 | -8,390 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 1,544,683 | -7,100 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 1,551,783 | -7,356 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 1,559,139 | -5,203 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 1,564,342 | +1,196 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 1,563,146 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 1,563,146 | first reading |
3,132 posts held, back to 4 August 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 271 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,132 (4 August 2025 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,349,040 |
| Reactions total | 98,932 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 64 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 53of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.1 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 31.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 76.2% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 33,300 views — 2.17% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 39,800).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /507112 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC | 59 minutes – 2.6 hours old | 9,040 views ~199 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,705 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 28 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /506912 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC | 853 minutes – 5.0 hours old | 20,000 views ~211 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,301 interp. → 3.0 hours: 17,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 56 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /506512 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC | 887 minutes – 5.6 hours old | 23,800 views ~233 reactions | 3.0 hours: 21,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 87 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /506412 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC | 1010 minutes – 6.0 hours old | 20,900 views ~248 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,855 interp. → 3.0 hours: 18,500 → 6.0 hours: 20,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 56 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /506312 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC | 139 minutes – 7.4 hours old | 25,000 views ~339 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,783 interp. → 3.0 hours: 21,655 interp. → 6.0 hours: 24,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 76 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /505912 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC | 1434 minutes – 8.4 hours old | 23,700 views ~46 reactions | 60 minutes: 10,119 interp. → 3.0 hours: 19,097 interp. → 6.0 hours: 22,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 75 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /505812 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC | 176 minutes – 9.6 hours old | 26,700 views ~139 reactions | 60 minutes: 12,296 interp. → 3.0 hours: 20,500 → 6.0 hours: 25,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 70 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /505612 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC | 2036 minutes – 12 hours old | 28,800 views ~593 reactions | 60 minutes: 9,947 interp. → 3.0 hours: 19,976 interp. → 6.0 hours: 25,400 → 12 hours: 28,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
20,395 reactions across 76 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,682 | 42.6% | |
| 🤣 | 6,604 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,420 | 6.96% | |
| 😁 | 1,275 | 6.25% | |
| 👍 | 866 | 4.25% | |
| 🤓 | 749 | 3.67% | |
| 👌 | 548 | 2.69% | |
| 👏 | 251 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316,117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 April 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjex6cbL | 1 | 7 July 2026 | 7 July 2026 |
| 2Vtzque1JS6 | 1 | 5 August 2026 | 5 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqxKbZW1 | 1 | 25 June 2026 | 25 June 2026 |
| 2W5zFK47gPj | 1 | 17 July 2026 | 17 July 2026 |
| 2W5zFK79MnZ | 1 | 29 July 2026 | 29 July 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FusgsENfjxqqvm92SHRUQYtgCSqrMPY | 1 | 11 June 2026 | 11 June 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqE1dR7FvSJ3mnMC9CD3d8yT3G6LR98eEtB1Mh | 1 | 26 May 2026 | 26 May 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 April 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Вот так наблюдали полное солнечное затмение в испанском городе Кастрохерисе. Хотелось бы оказаться там 😨
❤127🔥58🤓14
Жители Исландии на пару минут оказались во тьме. Там произошло полное солнечное затмение, из-за чего день превратился в ночь. Кстати, следующее полное затмение в России ожидается 30 марта 2033 года на Чукотке, а 20 апреля 2061 года — в европейской части страны. Надеемся, что дождёмся 😐
❤139🔥48🤓13👍7🤣4
Солнечное затмение началось в России — прямо сейчас его наблюдают в Петербурге и других регионах страны. В СПб Луна начала закрывать Солнце около 19:59, а максимальная фаза наступит примерно в 20:51 и закроется около 80% солнечного диска. Петербуржцы и жители Севера, мы вам завидуем 😨
❤151🔥63👍15👏2😁2
Идея для туалета в нишевых московских заведениях 😂
🤣145❤62😁21👍9🔥7👏4
К Трампу якобы приставили «девушку-будильник», которая бьёт его током, если тот начинает засыпать. Такую шуточную теорию разогнали после нового видео из Белого дома, где президент США на несколько секунд закрывает глаза, а стоящая рядом девушка делает движение рукой у живота. В этот же момент Трамп резко оживает. Интернет быстро решил, что под одеждой у неё спрятана кнопка для «электрошока». Но конспирология прожила…
❤164🤣137😁37👍1
Если в какой-то момент осени захочется просто сменить серое небо на солнце - Эмираты для этого идеальный вариант. Летняя жара как раз начинает отпускать, а зимой там вообще начинается самое приятное время. Плюс сейчас на Островке есть отличные скидки на отели, аж до 46%. И что особенно удобно, можно выбрать возвратный тариф. Из того, куда мы бы сами смотрели: Khalidia Palace Hotel Dubai — скидка до 46%, Al Habtoo…
❤19🤣13🔥6👏4🤓4
«Обсессия» не лучший хоррор года. Новый хоррор внезапно стал самым высокооценённым в 2026 году — «Подростковый секс и смерть в лагере Миазма» набрал 98% от критиков на Rotten Tomatoes и обошёл Обсессию с её 94%. Это мета-слэшер от Джейн Шонбрун, режиссёра «Я видел свечение телевизора». По сюжету молодую постановщицу нанимают перезапустить старую хоррор-франшизу Camp Miasma, и она отправляется искать актрису, сыгравш…
🤣90❤32🤓13👌4
Кинотеатру в Канаде пришлось рисовать афишу нового «Человека-паука» от руки. Из-за проблем с доставкой официальный постер «Человека-паука: Новый день» до кинотеатра так и не доехал, поэтому руководство нашло максимально бюджетный выход — попросило одного из сотрудников сделать свою версию. Оцените этот нереальный рисунок карандашом 😆
❤322🤣166🔥66👍24😁9👌6
Приложение Ozon Банк удалили из Google Play. В сети предполагают, что это возможно произошло из-за ошибки, но уверены, что его могут в ближайшее время удалить из AppStore. Ранее из AppStore удалили приложение Яндекс Пэй. Началось 😐 UPD К нам пришла пресс-служба Ozon и успокоила: Приложение Ozon Банка недоступно в Google Play, но все скачанные ранее приложения работают, как и прежде. Инструкции по установке и работ…
❤97😁26🤓17🤣5👍4
Разработчик сделал для сына «безопасный Roblox», где вместо реальных игроков — боты с ChatGPT. Отец не разрешает ребёнку играть в оригинал, потому что переживает из-за общения с незнакомцами. Теперь мальчик проходит паркур-карты вместе с ботами, обученными на чужих прохождениях, и переписывается в чате с ИИ-персонажами. Сам он тоже может участвовать в этих разговорах. В соцсетях идея многим показалась довольно опас…
❤154👍31🤣26👌5🤓5🔥3
Яндекс Пэй удален из AppStore. Яндекс официально подтвердили, что приложение теперь недоступно для установки. Вслед за Пэй, могут быть удалены другие приложения экосистемы Яндекса из-за санкций. Главное, чтобы другие приложения не трогали 😭 UPD: Все остальные сервисы и приложения Яндекса остаются доступными в магазинах приложений и продолжают работать как раньше
❤187🤣60👌25🤓10🔥9👏6😁3
Бар для вайбкодеров открыли в Пекине. В AGI Bar можно пить пиво и параллельно бесплатно жечь безлимитные токены DeepSeek V4 Flash. На экранах вместо спортивных трансляций крутят вакансии ИИ-компаний, а за 198 юаней продают годовой абонемент с бесплатным AGI-пивом. Сбор CEO стартапов по пятницам теперь там 😧
❤56😁19🔥15🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,132 posts we hold for @serch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@serch edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 311,187 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@serch named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
269 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сёрч” (@serch), 1,533,651 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.