Выбираем лучший образ?
❤21👍13🔥13custom 52400307401706812282

Channel
@grekovadanilina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17,870subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001863059603 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grekovadanilina |
| Description | Бьюти-инфлюэнсер, сертификат Гарварда в сфере wellness: О красоте, стиле и жизни с удовольствием. Косметика, процедуры, путешествия, дача и lifestyle. Съёмки на ТВ и интервью для медиа. Для связи @yoloprmanager |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grekovadanilina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 17,870 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 17,872 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 17,875 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 17,861 | +43 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 17,818 | -23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 17,841 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 17,859 | -34 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 17,893 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,658 |
| Reactions total | 2,604 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,604 reactions across 35 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,008 | 38.7% | |
| 🔥 | 599 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 458 | 17.6% | |
| 😁 | 197 | 7.57% | |
| custom 5240030740170681228 | 183 | 7.03% | |
| 🥰 | 50 | 1.92% | |
| ❤🔥 | 37 | 1.42% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 1.38% | |
| 😱 | 15 | 0.576% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 0.499% | |
| custom 5393470199166938617 | 4 | 0.154% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 0.115% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.038% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,604reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Выбираем лучший образ?
❤21👍13🔥13custom 52400307401706812282
Кто звезда, девочки? Я 🌟
🔥30👍15❤11custom 52400307401706812287
Давно не было рабочих рекомендаций Несу вам сегодня: гомеопатические капли «Адонис». У меня сейчас Инсонния, но вроде у них все рабочие. И свечи тоже рабочие, но я не пробовала. Вводить строго по схеме, эффект накопительный, как и от любой гомеопатии. Капли мягкие, но спиртовые, если вдруг кому важно. Чем хороши: • поддержка при пошаливающих нервишках и нарушениях сна • уменьшают тревогу, снижают уровень стресса …
🔥25👍10❤7custom 52400307401706812287🤪1
Можете звать меня просто: Аня - легкая рука 😆😆
❤44🔥16👍12custom 52400307401706812285🥰4
Мои любимые пижамы и халаты: • хлопковая пижама morфeus • шелковый халат ayris • льняная пижама quince Какой нравится больше?
❤34🔥17👍7custom 52400307401706812287
По четвергам рассказываю про свои девайсы. Сегодня - эластичная маска со статичными электродами. Удобно - намазал лицо гелем или маской, надел, включил токи и делай что хочешь. Неудобно - вибрация прошибает аж до глаз, все трясется, читать невозможно. Есть, кстати, тоже - маска оч сильно все стягивает, рот открыть не получается. Наносим сыворотку, крем или просто токопроводящий гель, вибрация круто снимает отечнос…
👍31❤11😱9custom 52400307401706812288🔥5🥰3
Ура, денежный четверг! Сегодня наш любимый день. Помните, кладем весь нал (или пластик с баблишком) под кофе, добавляем корицу (кто сомневается в качестве молотой корицы, кидайте сразу палку) и приговариваем: Корицу добавляем, деньги призываем! Не филоним, и не говорим потом, что пропустили пост!
❤37👍9🔥6🤣5custom 53934701991669386174custom 52400307401706812283
И немножко дачного вайба ♥️
❤70🔥28👍9custom 52400307401706812289
Как там говорят, в гостях хорошо, а дома лучше? Даже несмотря на шикарный отель, в котором мы отдыхали, дома и правда лучше! Дома есть мои любимые шелковые наволочки Ayris Silk. Не поверите, но я брала шелковую наволочку с собой! Вообще разница между хлопком и качественным шелком заметна сразу: шелк более нежный материал. Дочь моя, обладатель роскошной шевелюры аж до лопаток, может спать только на шелковых наволочка…
❤30👍16😍13custom 52400307401706812286🔥4
А вот и мои пришедшие заказы: • браслет нежно розового цвета с серебром Tous (Испания) • комплект белья с фламинго Victoria’s Secret • новый аппарат для лица Mommy Care Penta Prime (Корея), сделаю обзор, классная штука • шикарнейшие Джорданы 🩶, есть в чем лететь на Фили • тапки для дачи из замши Oysho (Испания) Нравится?
❤42👍15🔥9custom 52400307401706812286❤🔥3
В зарослях укропа помидор: именно так сегодня проходит наша рубрика «что купила на мп» • красивый прозрачный чайник, завариваю травяной чай, добавляю все что растет на газоне: лаванда, розмарин, думаю, может туда еще помидорные листья покидать, укроп, петрушку и базилик? • шикарнейшая фарфоровая кружка с Ежиком в тумане. Ссылки рабочие, можете брать. И нет, это не реклама (а жаль)
❤41👍15🔥10custom 52400307401706812284
Живем лишь раз! pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @grekovadanilina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 151,202 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Живем лишь раз!” (@grekovadanilina), 17,870 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grekovadanilina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.