Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,152–3,264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 04:36
3,165
-10
12 Sept 2026, 10:21
3,175
-17
7 Sept 2026, 23:18
3,192
-11
2 Sept 2026, 20:08
3,203
-5
30 Aug 2026, 08:18
3,208
-6
27 Aug 2026, 06:54
3,214
-11
24 Aug 2026, 07:07
3,225
-13
20 Aug 2026, 17:22
3,238
-5
17 Aug 2026, 16:58
3,243
-3
14 Aug 2026, 01:57
3,246
-5
10 Aug 2026, 23:11
3,251
+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
3,249
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:09
3,249
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
406 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
163
40.1%
custom 5226478434724645464
53
13.1%
🎉
48
11.8%
😍
48
11.8%
❤
34
8.37%
👍
27
6.65%
🥰
24
5.91%
👏
5
1.23%
💘
2
0.493%
💯
2
0.493%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
КМС по ягодичному мосту в федерации WPSO-A получен 🙂↕️
Это я сегодня съездила на соревнования)
Подняла 215 кг в категории до 67,5 кг 😇💪 мой вес 61,6 кг
Перед этим еще поднимала штангу 200 кг (на нижнем видео)
В этот раз у меня другого формата подготовка, и я решила не отвлекаться на влоги, съемку, повествование об этом и т.д.
Будто, чем меньше об этом говоришь, тем меньше от себя требуешь и тем лучше и больше пол…
Я тут попробовала 200 кг на раз поднять))
Получилось очень легко 🥳
И еще перед этим 180 кг 2×9
и 190 кг 2×5 (считаю вместе с подъёмом с пола)
Веса просто 🔥🔥
Скоро-скоро... 🙂↕️😏
#моятрена #ягодичныймост
Пока сын на площадке развлекался с тренажерами, мне удалось сделать аж 8 подходов на турнике и 3 подхода на брусьях 😅 зависли тут
Получилась почти полноценная тренировка))
Тимка тоже любит всю эту фитнес-движуху и повторяет за мной 🥰 пробует везде повисеть, залезть, покрутить и т.д. 🚗
Нравятся такие летние спонтанные турнички 😁
#режимлайф
У меня всё стабильно 🫶
Треним, кушаем, гуляем, работаем, прогрессируем 💪
Сегодня удалось сделать
180 кг на 7 повторений (в 2 подхода) и 160 кг на 10 повторений (в 2 подхода)
Очень нравится это движение, прям хорошо его чувствую ☺️
В августе план добраться до 200 кг на штанге 😅
#моятрена #ягодичныймост
180 кг полетели 🚀
Веса на трене были такие ☺️
☺️140 кг 2×10
☺️160 кг 3×8
☺️180 кг 3×5
Обычно считаю без подъема с пола, только повторения
А если считать вместе с подъемом с пола, то 6 раз
В зале все офигевают, на 1 видео - на фоне видно, а на 2 видео - слышно 😅
Пока на этом весе планирую задержаться и повышать в количестве повторений
В октябре прошлого года делала 180 кг полько 2 раза (подъем + 1 повторение) и в…
Вайб домашних трень 😇
И актуальная форма)
Нет цели расти в ногах, или в спине, или в плечах
Очень нравится форма сейчас, а больше мышц мне и не надо 🙂↕️
Мне только в рабочих весах в ягодичном мостике надо расти 😂
Рада, что пришла к тому, что всё в себе нравится и ничего не хочется менять, полная гармония с собой, с телом и головой 🫶 буду просто поддерживать тот мышечный каркас, что приобрела
Но может через время я…
🔥30👍12🥰6💘2💯2😍2❤1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @fitness_vibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
katyaklish @katyaklish · 21,973 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
Правильное питание | Фитнес Диета @pokhudeniePP · 34,075 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
@100_sv @sveta100_sv · 64,114 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
модная кома @modnayacoma · 26,623 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фитнес вайб | Тренер Юлия” (@fitness_vibe), 3,165 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fitness_vibe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
