9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2,754. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,311–29,453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 22:03
28,543
-432
13 Aug 2026, 11:25
28,975
+272
12 Aug 2026, 09:35
28,703
+1,779
11 Aug 2026, 12:32
26,924
+690
10 Aug 2026, 13:16
26,234
+59
9 Aug 2026, 09:51
26,175
+72
8 Aug 2026, 08:23
26,103
-388
7 Aug 2026, 05:40
26,491
+702
6 Aug 2026, 10:04
25,789
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.87%
avg views ÷ 28,543 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
39 (2 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
87,578
Reactions total
4,104
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,104 reactions across 39 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,750
42.6%
custom 5469780953289224276
513
12.5%
🔥
381
9.28%
😁
236
5.75%
🤩
227
5.53%
custom 5472271746558093841
203
4.95%
💅
198
4.82%
custom 5397847058604377452
181
4.41%
💋
155
3.78%
🙏
133
3.24%
💯
95
2.31%
🤝
32
0.78%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 39 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @holy_lelya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,770
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,130
over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFHPfTmK
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Я не дождалась выходных и сделала один на двоих. Чисто на пробу, мало ли..
И БОЖЕ МОЙ КАК ЖЕ ЭТО ВКУСНО ЁБТВОЮМАТЬ, девочки и мальчики 😍
Хрустящий, теплый круассан из пекарни, внутри мороженое Магнат с карамелью, которое тут же тает и затекает во все масляные слои и превращает их в какую-то совершенно неприличную по степени вкусноты феерию.
Заклинаю вас, съешьте это — сей гастроэкстаз тут же попадёт в те самые 20%…
Вместо доброго утра желаю вам такой же уверенности в себе как у людей, продающих на Авито раскрашенные картины по номерам, пустые пакеты Zara и одежду, сделанную из пакетов Вб и Озона
Заклинаю вас повторить это на выходных!
Страдать у плиты не придётся. Делается быстро, а на выходе гастрошедевр ресторанного уровня.
• закуска с солнечным абрикосом;
• лимонад с базиликом и каплей волшебства;
Ну и напоминаю красивый лайффак: если не хватает сияния, то феячим под тональник кремовый хайлайтер или бронзер любимого оттенка.
В целом, эта бибишка итак хорошо освежает, но иногда хочется сиять ярче звезд, ю ноу
Наконец-то познакомилась с Сочинским брендом Matsesta — взяла на пробу минеральный BB с SPF 30.
Я сейчас на кислотах, а с сентября планирую добавить ретинол — поэтому солнцезащита для меня не факультативный кружок на лето, а обязательная часть программы весь год.
И знаете что? Очень даже довольна.
Кремик деликатно увлажняет и ложится естественно, без эффекта маски. В нанесении не капризный, поры не забил. Быстро п…
Это выглядит настолько вкусно, что на днях я обязательно повторю.
Круассан + мороженое — уже пару недель как тренд Тиктока.
Если вы тоже будете, то не жопьтесь и берите хороший круассан в пекарне, а не сухой магазинный хлебушек в пластике.
И хочу напомнить базу дорогих волос, на которые любуются вне зависимости от длины и цвета.
Для начала вспомним: волос, который уже вырос из головы — мертвый. Его не удастся «оживить», «напитать витаминами» и накормить яйцом, шпинатом, авокадо и лососем, прикладывая это к корням. Он уже всё.
Нам остается только:
• украшать волосы сверху — тут крем, бальзамы, маски, спреи, ампулы и прочие примочки, дающие гладкость,…
Если бы волосы умели говорить, мои рассыпались бы в благодарностях, и кланялись в пол, целуя рученьки за то, как я с ними заботлива и обходительна.
А я благодарю создателя Laminaria Expert Рустема за то, как он умеет украшать любые волосы, выдавая в своих продуктах уровень люкса, и не требуя за это половину зарплаты айтишника.
Я очень ждала, пока этот крем появится в наличии.
• во-первых, потому что у меня уже ест…
Я не могу это доказать, но:
• из красивого стакана вода в несколько раз вкуснее;
• вода на кухне и вода в ванной — разная. Нельзя помыть овощи в ванной. А умываться на кухне — преступление против лица!
• суп никогда не должен быть в квадратной посуде. Это круглая еда;
• четверг — это осень, а ещё 16:00;
• огурец кружочками, и огурец брусочками — два совершенно разных огурца;
• дома цацки резко кажутся тяжелыми,…
А ещё не перестаю мечтать о путешествии в ближайшее время.
Это буквально моя ежедневная мантра: просыпаюсь — хочу в отпуск, пью кофе — хочу в отпуск. В окно так вообще лучше не смотреть — так сильно хотеть начинаю, что аж зубки сводит.
И пока Вселенная обрабатывает мой запрос, я предусмотрительно сохраняю себе всевозможные лайфхаки, типа как сэкономить деньги на авиабилетах, или вот пост про туристические ловушки.
…
А вот чем я занимаюсь в разгар рабочего дня: мечтаю о том, как вечером заберусь на диван, устрою там гнездо из одеяла и подушек, включу на огромном экране что-то из сохранёнок и буду поедать вот эти закуски, жмурясь от удовольствия:
• Персики с бурратой — персик дольками, буррата, соль и базилик, капля бальзамического крема.
• Огурцы с творожным сыром и красной рыбой — кружочки огурца, сверху сыр, кусочек слабосолё…
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @holy_lelya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 45,967 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В поисках глиттера” (@holy_lelya), 28,543 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/holy_lelya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
