Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рамиль Харисов

Channel

Рамиль Харисов

@rrharisov_live

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45,499subscribers

-1,053 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370095923
TypeChannel
Username@rrharisov_live
Created23 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrharisov_live

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

53,400 average views per post against 45,674 subscribers — an engagement rate of 116.8%. Across the 8,196 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,972 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.99% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (18 July 2026 17 August 2026)
Posts measured8 of 8 published in the window (0 exact, 8 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled426,900
Mature posts only116.8% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers45,674 measured 16 August 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,196 channels · p10 2.35% · p25 4.99% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.0% · p90 36.8%
Position in cohort99.866th percentile · 11.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.094% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 17 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

45,49946,55246,025.55 August 2026 — 46,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,321 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,261 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,179 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,004 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,837 subscribers16 August 2026 — 45,674 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,499 subscribers5 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -1,053. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,341–46,710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:5845,499-175
16 Aug 2026, 04:3845,674-163
14 Aug 2026, 14:3345,837-87
13 Aug 2026, 08:0345,924-80
12 Aug 2026, 06:3246,004-90
11 Aug 2026, 06:4146,094-85
10 Aug 2026, 06:1746,179-82
9 Aug 2026, 08:3146,261-60
8 Aug 2026, 10:3746,321-112
7 Aug 2026, 10:3846,433-57
6 Aug 2026, 10:5046,490-62
6 Aug 2026, 01:4746,552no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1046,552first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
105.6%
avg views ÷ 45,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
48,100
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.146%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held22 (18 June 202617 August 2026)
Views total384,550
Reactions total562
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
2m 56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,625 reactions across 21 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔42226.0%
💯30919.0%
👍29518.2%
👌975.97%
🤣875.35%
694.25%
👏684.18%
😢583.57%
👎573.51%
🤨362.22%
🔥321.97%
🤬261.60%
😁221.35%
🙏221.35%
🎉140.862%
😱70.431%
🙈30.185%
😡10.062%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,700reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈3,750 views61 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Регистрация на думскую кампанию закрыта по календарю, но не по составу. Сегодня Верховный суд рассматривает апелляцию «Яблока» на отмену федерального списка – от этого зависит, останется ли в бюллетене по единому округу 11 партий или 10. В выборах участвуют «Единая Россия», КПРФ, ЛДПР, «Справедливая Россия», «Новые люди», «Яблоко», «Родина», Партия пенсионеров, «Коммунисты России», «Зеленые» и Партия прямой демократ

🤔25💯19👍8👌4👎31👏1

13 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈19,700 views74 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Сообщения о том, что Сербия вслед за Черногорией готовится отменить безвизовый режим для россиян, пока опережают факты. Министр по европейской интеграции Неманя Старович действительно говорил о намерении Белграда к концу 2027 года быть готовым к более глубокой интеграции в Шенгенскую зону. Но о введении виз для граждан России он не объявлял. Сейчас россияне по-прежнему могут находиться в Сербии без визы до 30 дней.

🤔29💯22👍15👌42👎2

12 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈23,400 views62 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Мегаполис устроен так, что самый дефицитный ресурс избирателя – это время, а не его политическая воля. Дорога, работа, учеба и семейные обязанности выстраивают график, в котором лишний час на поездку до избирательного участка часто оказывается тем звеном, которое просто выпадает из дня. Именно в этой логике дистанционное электронное голосование работает не как техническая опция, а как ответ на конкретную городскую пр

💯25🤔17👍7🤨6👎4👌21

11 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈27,200 views67 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Когда я писал, что от Президента до дальневосточной школы очень близко, я, конечно, не мог предугадать, что настолько. Сегодня Владимир Путин прибыл в Республику Бурятия. Встречали его полпред Юрий Трутнев, глава региона Алексей Цыденов и школьник, недавно позвавший Владимира Путина в гости. Что это значит политически, объяснять не надо – знак доверия к уникальной дальневосточной вертикали власти и свидетельство то

👌29🤔12👍9🤨7💯53👎2

7 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈207,000 views64 reactionsread 17 August 2026

От Президента до дальневосточной школы. Интересно наблюдать, как на протяжении всех последних лет поручения Президента России Владимира Путина реализуются на Дальнем Востоке. Конкретные примеры привел вице-премьер Юрий Трутнев на встрече с лидером страны. Школа в Магадане, кампус «СахалинТех», детский сад в Хабаровске, поликлиники в Улан-Удэ и Владивостоке, центральная больница в Нерюнгри. Конечно же, есть еще аэро

🤔24👍20💯12🤬32👎2🤣1

4 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈35,200 views87 reactionsread 17 August 2026

«Завтра» опубликовала резонансное расследование о грубых фальсификациях истории русской философии в Институте философии РАН. Оказывается, в этом «храме науки» методично и планомерно выворачивают наизнанку философское наследие России, выставляя наших мыслителей-патриотов либералами и западниками, а саму русскую мысль – как некую бледную тень западной философии. Становится страшно, что это происходит в нашей стране. И

🤔39👍21🤬9💯7👎63🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC≈27,200 views71 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Вижу, что серия роликов проекта «Россия сильна Уралом» продолжает выходить и распространяться по телеграм-каналам и группам в соцсетях. И, похоже, авторы нашли формат, который вполне может стать трендом. Де Геннин, Татищев, Демидов, Бажов, Кузнецов, Попов, Черепановы – это не абстрактный набор фамилий из учебника истории. Через каждого героя раскрывается отдельная сторона уральской идентичности: промышленность, инже

🤔52💯9👍5👌41

24 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈41,100 views76 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @razvivaemrfPhoto

ВЭБ заработал ₽ 222+ млрд для будущих пенсионеров по итогам I полугодия 2026 года 🏛 ➡️ Ключевые показатели: ➡️ доходы по расширенному портфелю: ₽ 218,4 млрд (доходность 16,32% годовых) ➡️ доходы через портфель госбумаг: ₽ 3,87 млрд (доходность 14,81% годовых) Вложения направлены в проекты городской инфраструктуры, транспорта, электроэнергетики и телекома. 💼 ВЭБ инвестирует накопления 36,5+ млн клиентов Социальног

🤔28👍21💯13🤨7👌52

18 Jul 2026, 13:01 UTC≈46,300 views89 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Партия победы начинает... Юрий Трутнев официально стал лицом избирательной кампании партии «Единая Россия» по Дальнему Востоку. Для тех, кто хоть немного разбирается во внутриполитической кухне, всё было очевидно еще на форуме «Есть результат» во Владивостоке. Тогда Трутнев максимально ясно обозначил, что все результаты и все планы невозможны без большинства «Единой России». Бюджет, голосование за льготы, создание з

💯24🤔22👍13👎9🤨7🤣5👌43

14 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC≈43,200 views77 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Коллеги из канала, тесно связанного с полпредством по ДФО, вскользь упомянули, что топливная повестка в фокусе (хотя в данном случае, видимо, в прицеле) полпреда Президента Юрия Трутнева. Действительно: Комсомольский НПЗ (Хабаровский край) раньше срока заканчивает плановый ремонт и начинает работу. Александр Осипов (Забайкальский край) выступил с федеральной инициативой по развертыванию сети мини-НПЗ, понимая, какой

💯38🤔17👍13🤬3👌2👎21🤨1

10 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈27,300 views74 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Попал в ТОП авторских телеграм-каналов политтехнологов. Спасибо за доверие! https://t.me/polittehnologi/11034 Подписаться на канал📱

👏3914🎉12👍4🔥3💯1🙏1

9 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC≈42,000 views70 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Какие акценты можно заметить по итогу поездки Трампа на саммит ЕС: 1. Внеочередной раз Трамп поменял риторику и поддержал Зеленского и Украину. Итог – он позвонит Путину и снова начнет поддерживать Россию. Это его стиль, и к такого рода риторике не стоит относиться серьезно. Это скорее не про геополитику, а медиаполитику. Здесь важно отметить, что позиции Рубио усиливаются, а они антироссийские. 2. Трамп продолжает

🤔27💯21👍12👌7🤨21

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @rrharisov_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 53,917 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рамиль Харисов” (@rrharisov_live), 45,499 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrharisov_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.