Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рамиль Харисов

Channel

Рамиль Харисов

@rrharisov_live

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

53,121subscribers

+6,569 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370095923
TypeChannel
Username@rrharisov_live
DescriptionОснователь агентства «Щенки Медиа» Медиатехнолог, политтехнолог. Канал о медиа, политике и личных размышлениях По рекламе: @bosteleg Поспорить с автором: @rrharisov Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3EgdAa
Created23 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrharisov_live

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

42,800 average views per post against 53,121 subscribers — an engagement rate of 80.6%. Across the 8,318 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,978 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.03% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.3%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (1 September 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Posts measured33 of 33 published in the window (0 exact, 33 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,412,380
Mature posts only82.7% over 32 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers53,121 measured 30 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,318 channels · p10 2.49% · p25 5.03% · p50 10.3% · p75 20.8% · p90 35.2%
Position in cohort99.411th percentile · 7.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.059% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 1 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

35,64155,11945,3805 August 2026 — 46,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,321 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,261 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,179 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,004 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,837 subscribers16 August 2026 — 45,674 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,499 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,420 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,235 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,420 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,478 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,199 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,080 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,322 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,030 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,641 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,970 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,828 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,773 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,588 subscribers1 September 2026 — 49,089 subscribers2 September 2026 — 55,119 subscribers4 September 2026 — 54,379 subscribers6 September 2026 — 52,173 subscribers10 September 2026 — 50,559 subscribers12 September 2026 — 50,843 subscribers14 September 2026 — 50,625 subscribers15 September 2026 — 51,090 subscribers18 September 2026 — 51,435 subscribers30 September 2026 — 53,121 subscribers53,1215 August 202630 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 55 days, net +6,569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,719–58,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Sept 2026, 06:1453,121+1,686
18 Sept 2026, 01:2051,435+345
15 Sept 2026, 20:5551,090+465
14 Sept 2026, 04:3850,625-218
12 Sept 2026, 09:1850,843+284
10 Sept 2026, 08:3650,559-1,614
6 Sept 2026, 23:3652,173-2,206
4 Sept 2026, 06:1854,379-740
2 Sept 2026, 16:0355,119+6,030
1 Sept 2026, 14:0549,089+2,501
31 Aug 2026, 10:4846,588+2,815
30 Aug 2026, 14:0843,773+2,945
29 Aug 2026, 10:4440,828-142
28 Aug 2026, 14:1740,970+5,329
27 Aug 2026, 13:4435,641-9,389
26 Aug 2026, 11:3845,030+708
25 Aug 2026, 12:1644,322+1,242
24 Aug 2026, 09:3643,080-119
22 Aug 2026, 20:3443,199+721
21 Aug 2026, 11:1842,478first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.6%
avg views ÷ 53,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
42,800
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.182%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held71 (18 June 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total1,412,380
Reactions total2,567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Oct 2026, 18:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈608
Videos
≈178
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 39m
Average length
13m 16s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,486 reactions across 70 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1,21422.1%
💯1,20622.0%
👍1,13120.6%
👌3125.69%
👎3065.58%
❤2684.89%
🔥2224.05%
👏1532.79%
🤣1532.79%
🤬1292.35%
😁1252.28%
🤨891.62%
🎉681.24%
😢581.06%
🙏220.401%
🙈140.255%
😱80.146%
😡40.073%
🤝20.036%
🤯20.036%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,561 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.41%
1 of 71 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
27,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
29,900
over 70 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvBS5fH118 August 202618 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 1 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC≈7,280 views42 reactionsread 1 October 2026

В новой Госдуме комитет по развитию гражданского общества, вопросам общественных и религиозных объединений возглавил Борис Чернышов. Интересно, что уже на первом заседании он довольно четко обозначил новый вектор работы комитета. Первый приоритет – поддержка участников СВО и их семей. Отдельно – бесплатная юридическая помощь бойцам и их близким. Далее – НКО, добровольчество, благотворительность, взаимодействие с РП…

👍19💯11🤔7👎3❤1🤨1

30 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC≈37,700 views84 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Рейс Flydubai Дубай – Тель-Авив стал не только чрезвычайной ситуацией в воздухе. За несколько часов он показал, как медиа успевают собрать версию события еще до того, как его начинают устанавливать следствие и авиакомпания. Сначала были сигналы 7700 и 7500, резкое снижение и посадка в саудовском Табуке. Затем в медиа появилась версия о драке российского и украинского пилотов. Ее сразу начали разворачивать в политиче…

💯40🤔13👍11🤬6👎5👏5❤2🤨1

28 Sept 2026, 04:45 UTC≈31,100 views119 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Ладу скупили в России. Это не кликбейт и не хайп, но и не про машины. Крупный бренд одежды сделал коллаборацию с АвтоВАЗом: выпустил футболки, рубашки и аксессуары. Коллекцию быстро раскупают. Сам недавно зашел в магазин – нужных вещей уже не было, и не факт, что их еще привезут. К чему этот пост. Заигрывание с культурным кодом работает идеально. Машины этого бренда покупают неохотно, а одежду с понятными образами –…

💯58👍23🤔15😁13👎9🤨1

26 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈27,900 views74 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Каспийский прибрежный кластер выходит из стадии планов и презентаций на реальную стройплощадку. Сейчас там создают базовую инфраструктуру, без которой большой морской курорт просто не сможет работать: инженерные сети, внутренние дороги, парковки, благоустройство и многофункциональный центр. Отдельно строятся три подъездные дороги к кластеру и Всероссийскому детскому центру «Дагестан». Следующий этап уже начинается:…

👍33🤔17💯15👎4🤨4👌1

24 Sept 2026, 21:08 UTC≈28,800 views126 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

Появление основателя «Еврохима» Андрея Мельниченко в программе Дмитрия Саймса «Большая игра» стоит читать в связке с его недавним выходом в The Economist. Британский журнал вынес российского предпринимателя на обложку, опубликовал его эссе о рисках ослабления России и большое интервью о сценариях ее будущего. Теперь эта же система аргументов прозвучала для российской аудитории. В центре разговора оказалась формула «…

💯44👍30🤔23👎12🤬11❤3🤣2😡1

24 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈30,800 views81 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Video

Как блогеры приходят в политику? Об этом мы поговорили с председателем комитета по работе с инфлюенсерами партии «Новые Люди» Марией Марьясовой в эфире стрима «Щенки Медиа» на площадке Ночи выборов в РИА Новости. Многие думают, что специальные компетенции для того, чтобы стать депутатом и участвовать в выборах не нужны. Однако просто медийности и умения вести блог для этого недостаточно: нужно работать на благо люде…

👍28💯18🤔17👎14❤3😁1

22 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC≈94,500 views75 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Photo

На форуме «Диалог о фейках 4.0» в НЦ «Россия» озвучили результаты исследования АНО «Диалог Регионы» о том, как дети и подростки используют нейросети. ИИ для них уже не отдельная технология и не экзотика, а привычный цифровой инструмент: им пользуются 94% опрошенных россиян в возрасте от 10 до 17 лет. Треть обращается к нейросетям каждый день, еще треть – хотя бы раз в неделю. Самый популярный сервис – «Алиса AI»: ее…

🤔28💯18👍15👎6🤬5❤1🤨1🤯1

21 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC≈27,200 views105 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarskij_kray

ПОЧЕМУ ЕДИНАЯ РОССИЯ ПОЛУЧИЛА РЕКОРДНЫЙ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ НА ЭТИХ ВЫБОРАХ? Мы видим объединение вокруг президента и признание результатов работы партии за все последние годы. Завершившиеся вчера выборы депутатов Госдумы действительно продемонстрировали в первую очередь доверие людей к процессу. По стране явка стала рекордной — 56,66%, это выше, чем результат предыдущих кампаний. В Краснодарском крае тоже высокий результат …

💯37👎22🤔19👍14🤬5🙈4🔥2🤣1

21 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈44,800 views72 reactionsread 1 October 2026

ЦИК объявил предварительные итоги выборов в Госдуму 2026 года. Осталось обработать 5% протоколов. Памфилова заявила, что финальные результаты объявят 25 сентября. Не буду пока подробно комментировать результаты: первое и второе места были очевидны («Единая Россия» и КПРФ). Основная борьба развернулась за третье и четвертое места – между ЛДПР и «Новыми людьми» – и началась еще в самом начале кампании, продолжаясь все…

💯24👍17🤔15👎9👌2🤨2❤1🤬1

21 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC≈27,500 views73 reactionsread 1 October 2026

Как Юрий Трутнев оставил политтехнологов без работы «Единая Россия» продолжает серию стабильных побед президентского курса в ДВФО. И самое время проанализировать избирательную кампанию, в которое есть один нюанс. Показанные 54% за партию при явке более 51% – итог не классических политтехнологических маневров, а стабильной многолетней работы команды полпредства и самого Юрия Трутнева. Составляющие этой работы: – ст…

🤔31💯17👍14🤨4👌3❤1🤣1😡1

20 Sept 2026, 21:44 UTC≈27,600 views69 reactionsread 1 October 2026
Video

С президентом РАСО Евгением Минченко в эфире стрима «Щенки Медиа» на площадке Ночи выборов поговорили о том, что значат промежуточные итоги выборов в Госдуму. «Единая Россия» сохранила первое место, КПРФ удерживает второе, но теряет в общем количестве голосов, а за третье место борются ЛДПР и «Новые люди». Эту картину можно рассматривать как результат общего менеджмента кампании. Во власти существовал запрос на сохр…

💯32🤔12👍10👎7🤬5🔥2❤1

20 Sept 2026, 20:02 UTC≈27,900 views72 reactionsread 1 October 2026

За эти три дня в Москве было особенно хорошо видно, что угрозы выборам все больше уходят в цифровое пространство. Речь уже не только о возможных конфликтах или провокациях на участках. Фейки, дипфейки, информационные вбросы, кибератаки и попытки представить любой технический сбой как доказательство «паралича системы» становятся отдельной частью борьбы вокруг выборов. Чтобы ударить по голосованию и его восприятию, не…

🤔33👌18👎6💯5🤨3🤬3🙈2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @rrharisov_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rrharisov_live edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 September 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 91 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рамиль Харисов” (@rrharisov_live), 53,121 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrharisov_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.