4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,804–1,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:17
1,806
-6
9 Aug 2026, 14:15
1,812
-9
6 Aug 2026, 06:50
1,821
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:03
1,821
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 1,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
379
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
15 (10 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
4,546
Reactions total
80
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
91 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
19
20.9%
❤
18
19.8%
😁
15
16.5%
🔥
12
13.2%
🗿
5
5.49%
🐳
4
4.40%
🤔
4
4.40%
💯
2
2.20%
🙏
2
2.20%
🤣
2
2.20%
🤷♂
2
2.20%
🦄
2
2.20%
custom 5296673868381954776
1
1.10%
🎉
1
1.10%
🤯
1
1.10%
🥱
1
1.10%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notcloudcafe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ну здрасте.. 😬
xGift закрывается и переходит под крыло Gates.
Любимое приложение для просмотра коллекций и мониторинга различных аспектов рынка подарков.
Каждый день заходил, теперь придётся искать замену.
До 8 августа выведите оттуда все активы, иначе потеряете доступ к средствам и подаркам.
Неулучшеные гифты перекинут на Gates, как я понял.
Раз в год и палка стреляет😀
Полез смотреть за сколько я его вообще брал, а когда долистал до прошлой осени, то почти прослезился от цен.
1-2-3 тона🥲
Сейчас 3 кажется беспросветным дном и полной апатией, а ведь совсем недавно гифтам рисовали смерть и очередное печальное зрелище на Тон.
Интересно, через год будет лучше или хуже😏
6. Понимаем, что это не закончится никогда!
Быть успешным и здоровым от всех привычек нужно всегда, до самого конца.
Нужно поменять и пересобрать самого себя в пользу того парня/девчонки, которые несмотря ни на что идут вперёд, принимают себя такими, какие они есть, но неизменно хотят стать лучше.
И даже когда устают и опускают на мгновение руки, понимают что лудка, алкоголь, сигареты, порно и наркота это точно не то…
Вы осознаёте что 80% человек в крипте это лудики?
Причём перцентиль можно добить до 99-100, если указать на то, что сама крипта начинает играть на лёгком дофамине и заставляет человека искать возможности ещё и ещё. Вместо того чтобы по заранее продуманной стратегии купить активы и с минимальной экспертизой ждать своего часа.
На соседнем канале Race описал темную сторону лудки, с которой вроде бы всё понятно.
Но в к…
И вот тут мы начинаем аккуратно вводить доступные вам прелести жизни: прогулки не менее получаса в день, чтение книг, активный отдых, в идеале спорт, различное рукоделие, встречи с друзьями и близкими, которые знают о вашей проблеме и помогают с ней справиться, без капания на мозги, готовка - в общем всё то, где надо что-то делать, а не сидеть на месте уставившись в стену.
Понятно что можно подключить нарколога/психо…
Clarity вот-вот преподнесут на блюдечке.
Трамп даже согласился добавить пункт о недопустимости заработка чинуш..как будто были другие варианты, и как будто это кого-то остановит за кадром😀
Финалить будут на днях, а успех, в случае если он будет, скорее всего преподнесут к августовкому уходу на каникулы.
Чуть позже, в сентябре могут подкрепить это всё хорошими новостями из SEC, и начать топить на полную.
Не сказать …
Не сказать что изи, Аргентина показала характер.
Но именно по игре это была очевиднейшая ставка.
Жаль не Англия была в финале, ну а так, турик закончил в плюс хотя бы по деньгам👌
Всех поздравляю, минимум 4 года футбола в крипте мы не увидим.. Хотяяя... там же ещё МЮ в лч вернулся🫠
Как и планировал забираю не выигрыш Аргентины за 1,7.
Безусловно красиво наблюдать как они раз за разом вырывают победу на последних минутах, но Испания немножко повыше уровнем и обычная грязь в финале вряд ли проканает.
Потому ожидаю победу Испании на классе.
Дополнительно взял итб1,5 - не очевидно, но на небольшой сайз для интереса можно попробовать.
Кто-нибудь будет смотреть матч или уже осточертели эти балабо…
Хочется что-то написать про наш родной Тон😎
Мне нравится что активность не сходит на нет даже в такие периоды затяжного падения и безделья.
Да, её меньше, но костяк есть, неудачники есть, ждущие тоже есть.
Даже на заборе хватает людей, которые всё хаят, но готовы что-то делать, только конкретики дайте.
Это хорошо, даже прекрасно я бы сказал.
И потому хочется напомнить вам ещё раз, как когда-то все покупали гифты за…
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30392
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30395
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30379
Вот это важно, и будет влиять на ближайшее будущее.
———————————————
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30381
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30384
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30385
Вот это хоть и политика, но показывает поступательную деятельность верхушки в определённом направлении.
—————————————————
https://t.me/crypto_hd/30386
https://t.me/crypto_hd/…
🔥2
Signed gunter
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @notcloudcafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 178,964 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Not Pixel Channel @notpixel_channel · 4,347,895 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“notcloud cafe🌩” (@notcloudcafe), 1,806 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notcloudcafe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.