عاشق همه پیام های پر مهر هر روزتون هستم ❤️ انشالا با یادگیری مهارت های جدید، همیشه رو به جلو حرکت داشته باشید

Channel
Richman : یاسین هدایتی فر
@pedarepuldar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,669subscribers
+529 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001004144589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pedarepuldar |
| Description | یاسین هدایتیفر ۱۰ سال تجربه آموزش۳۰هزار دانشجو تحلیل آینده بازارهای مالی مسکن| طلا|دلار دوره ارزشمند چگونه دارایی بخرید؟ و پیش بینی آینده Web.hedayatifar.com/pishbini پشتیبانی (24/7): 02147624005 @fastpooi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pedarepuldar |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 06:51 | 31,669 | -36 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 03:17 | 31,705 | -46 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 31,751 | +41 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 31,710 | -41 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:26 | 31,751 | +72 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:48 | 31,679 | +22 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:21 | 31,657 | +16 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:39 | 31,641 | -34 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:06 | 31,675 | -34 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:17 | 31,709 | +6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:11 | 31,703 | -56 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 31,759 | +17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:46 | 31,742 | +37 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 31,705 | +30 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 31,675 | -48 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:30 | 31,723 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 31,727 | -50 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 31,777 | -32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 31,809 | +140 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 31,669 | first reading |
Engagement
834 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.85%
- avg views ÷ 31,669 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,490
- 203 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 203
- of 834 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 203 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 834 (4 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 504,491 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 12:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,480
- Videos
- ≈1,470
- Links
- ≈2,140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 22m 46s
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 203 posts held from the last 30 days (2.46%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
برای یادگیری این مهارت و دریافت سیگنال های روزانه درآمد غیر فعال، فرم پایین رو پر کنید 👇 https://app.didar.me/customer/form/a9dea789-e735-4a56-872e-c5ded78a89f0 پشتیبان پاسخگو👇 @AhmadiHosheMali
اگر این 10% درآمد غیر فعال، اختیار صندوق طلا بخره، میتونه توی رشدهای طلا، سود چند برابری نسبت به طلا بده این اختیارها برای سررسید های دور هست که طلا رشد معمول خودش رو داشته باشه وقتی اختیار صندوق طلا میخرید، انگار حجم بیشتری از طلا توی تملک خودتون دارید و توی رشد طلا، اگر طلا 5% بالا بره، شما 15% بالا میرید به عبارتی اون 10% درآمد غیر فعال، میره 3 برابر طلا میخوره. مثلا اگر یک میلیارد داشته باشید، 100 میلیون د…
استراتژی به کار گرفته شده برای این سود بدون ریسک توی بازار، به نام کاورد کال شناخته میشه. و هر چه شما با این ابزارها و مهارت ها بیشتر آشنا باشید، رفاه بالاتری در آینده تجربه خواهید کرد. آیا آماده استفاده از این روش ها برای ساخت سودهای بالاتر هستید؟ و اگر یاد نگیرید چه اتفاقاتی رو تجربه می کنید؟ اما بریم سراغ این که اگر این درآمد های غیرفعال رو برای انجام معاملات پرریسک مثل خرید اختیارهای طلا اختصاص بدید، چه اتفاق…
ما توی اقتصاد واژه ای داریم به نام ریسک ریشیو این واژه میگه که شما چقدر سود رو، با چقدر ریسک بدست میارید؟ مثلا یک برنامه نویس و یک راننده تاکسی، هر دو ماهیانه 50 میلیون بدست میارن. اما برنامه نویس تو خونه هست و راننده در مقابل ریسک های مختلف تصادف پس در بلندمدت، برنامه نویس مطمئن تر رشد میکنه چون با ریسک کمتر پول ماهیانه بدست میاره و ثروت شما در آینده کاملا به این وابسته هست که با ریسک کمتر، سود بالاتر رو بدست ب…
تقریبا دو هفته قبل، موقعیتی روی کانال vip معرفی شد که بهمون سود 10% ماهیانه میداد. اما با یک اقدام، این سود به 14% افزایش پیدا کرد 14% سود بدون ریسک! این ارزش واقعی پول شماست. آیا این درصد سود کم هست؟ و آیا ما باید همیشه سودهای بالای 100% در ماه داشته باشیم تا سود خوب تلقی بشه؟ آیا این سود میتونه باز هم افزایش پیدا کنه؟ بله. زمانی که این سود به استراتژی های پرریسکی که توی ذهن شماست، اختصاص داده بشه
*میزان سود بدون ریسکی که از بازار میتونید بگیرید، هوش مالی شما رو تعیین می کنه* تورم مهرماه منتشر شد. 4.8% تورم ... نکته مهم این گزارش این هست که هر رقمی کمتر از این مقدار، یعنی از دست رفتن ارزش پول و تورم واقعی احساسی ما، دو برابر این مقدار هست. اما چطور میشه بدون ریسک این تورم رو پوشش داد؟ بدون ریسک بودن مهم هست. شاید بتونید طلا و کالا بخرید اما این که آیا هر ماه، این رشد رو داشته باشه، جای فکر هست شاید یک سال…
حرف های بی پرده مخبر در رابطه با جنگ ... تتر هم به 171 هزار تومان رسید. در کانال vip، این تاریخ 25 آبان از ابتدای ماه اعلام شد که پس از آن، اوضاع بازارها متفاوت خواهد شد حجم و شدت اخبار در این 25 آبان را دقیقا ببینید در وبینار 3 هفته قبل نیز، این تاریخ 25 آبان تا قبل پایان دی، برای شدت اخبار اعلام شده بود چقدر دقیق!
مهم سود نیست. علمی هست که بدست میارید تا روند ها براتون لذت بخش بشه 25% سود توی 10 روز. البته که در ادامه روند، سودشون بالاتر میره
23 میلیون سود رو بدون آگاهی از روند ها گرفتن قطعا اینرو خیلی بیشتر میکنن وقتی که استراتژی ها رو یاد بگیرن امشب آموزش کال اسپرد هاست روی پلن سالانه
#آموزش_116: آیا میدونی هدف از سرمایه گذاریت چیه؟ #یاسین_هدایتیفر
ببینید که چطور در ابتدا درآمد غیرفعال رو انجام دادن و امروز سیگنال صعودی اختیار رو با استراتژی اصولی انجام دادن و اگر فردا 3% سهام مثبت بخوره، بالای 50% سود رو میگیرن ترکیب درآمد غیر فعال و معاملات با سود بالا در جهت مشخص بازار این رو حتما یاد بگیر تا بی نیاز از توهم درآمد غیرفعال های جعلی و معاملات پرریسک جعلی بشی عضویت در کانال vip + آموزش های خاص 👇 https://app.didar.me/customer/form/ad7a95f0-b3ca-4c91-91a9-26c1…
Showing the 12 most recent of 834 posts we hold for @pedarepuldar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 17 posts on @pedarepuldar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 10
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
چطور میشه با این هزینه ها کنار اومد؟
- کار بیشتر5%
- ساخت درآمد غیر فعال89%
- چند شغله شدن13%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
یک سوال: فکر میکنی کدوم مورد، بیشترین تاثیر رو، روی زندگیت داره؟
- پول زیاد درآوردن31%
- تبدیل به احسن کردن دارایی ها62%
- خرید یک سهم یا نماد بسیار پر بازده14%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
طلا کی 3 برابر میشه؟
- هیچ وقت و در آینده ارزونتر میشه14%
- ۱ سال دیگه22%
- کمتر از ۱ سال دیگه20%
- بیشتر از ۱ سال دیگه48%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
در صورت وقوع جنگ، دلار خواهد ریخت؟
- بله41%
- خیر61%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
لایو رو کی بزاریم؟
- امشب ساعت ۹:۳۰52%
- فردا ساعت ۹:۳۰ شب50%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
وبینار رو دیدید
- بله😊15%
- نه متاسفانه .حیف شد😔85%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 834 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pedarepuldar named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 2 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@eco_ehsan · 1,131,336#1
@den_ir · 74,767#2
@Hossainazimi36 · 72,692#3
@haggetaghadom · 4,478#4
@Tse_Money · 5,821#5
@khanevadeteymoori · 6,129#6
@servatmandan_7 · 6,195#7
@tradegolds · 2,743#8
@motalesharif · 3,640#9
@sabainvesting · 1,689#10
@boorstahlilsignal · 2,702#11
@agent_ali · 50,909#12
@uniexchangehadi · 1,017#13
@trade_fundd · 25,183#14
@adibmh · 69,090#15
@goldsharpedu · 329#16
@brandbafi · 3,169#17
@Signal_Academy_location · 467#18
@SuperiorAnalysis · 7,570#19
@Akbari09154040409 · 7,903#20
@rezvaneghasemnejad · 1,486#21
@Maziyarfathi_Bourse · 964#22
@dideban_amlak · 19,951 (as read 6 September 2026)#23
@modiresabz · 15,988#24
@servatmandan_n · 9,651#25
@Aghaye_Eghtesad · 460,644#26
@crypto690 · 521#27
@Eghtesad_Emroz · 35,854#28
@ecocoach_net · 23,192#29
@saeed_rezapoorr · 129,381#30
@fekrema · 9,199#31
@Rtsbab · 1,559#32
@Goldtrade_dr · 2,071#33
@drghanizade · 1,024#34
@milyarder · 50,002#35
@vahidkeshmirypour · 26,910#36
@riskacir · 18,182#37
@BestETFs · 14,963#38
@eco_voice · 13,723#39
@hatef_invest · 153,441#40
@pmucoaching · 1,996#41
@hamed_kianiiii · 38,700#42
@MalekiBehrooz · 9,914#43
@behroozahmadieco · 50,455#44
@market_way · 1,542#45
@BOURSE_BINAZER · 10,984#46
@cloup1401 · 11,850#47
@tablobaziii · 31,006#48
@amirshafieiofficial · 9,496#49
@kaaamir · 10,188#50
@Alimahmoudian_eco · 7,000#51
@gold_signaalll · 21,270#52
@hooshemaliati · 1,558#53
@eghtesaderooz · 57,992#54
@fx_aradt · 240,109#55
@mahmoodbashash · 2,066#56
@alirezamojahedi · 2,124#57
@kar_kasb · 18,583#58
@Clever_Pip · 1,658#59
@aTraderNotesChannel · 247#60
@thinkingplus · 780#61
@optionreference · 12,107#62
@golden_candle_VVip · 9,351#63
@Black_Charismaa · 6,085#64
@Netboxes · 1,096#65
@arezoozarnoosheh · 9,710#66
@omidd950 · 1,904#67
@dar_oj · 1,155#68
@practicalmanagement · 14,724#69
@tahlilisho_education · 1,048#70
@denait · 21,029#71
@GasInspector · 3,503#72
@Sabrein_Fa · 1,845#73
@aboutSahand · 2,915#74
@azad_sma · 5,469#75
@Pargarlottery · 6,606#76
@amirashooor · 2,242#77
@sdbroker · 3,223#78
@didanshenidan · 12,828#79
@bourse99 · 8,763#80
@signalmetacena · 2,504#81
@nezam_fani_ejrai · 16,651#82
@fatemehrezaeimetaquantum · 3,069#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hamed_kianiiii · 38,700
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
@milyarder · 50,002
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@agent_ali · 50,909
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@hatef_invest · 153,441
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
@fx_aradt · 240,109
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 5 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Richman : یاسین هدایتی فر” (@pedarepuldar), 31,669 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pedarepuldar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.