🎤 "Another day, another celeb launching a meme coin… Who’s next?" 🦆 I’m waiting for the grandma from Titanic to drop her own coin. #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO More details : https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1902934663884427513
🍾5❤4👍1

Channel
@duckctochannel
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
136,967subscribers
-1,067 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002239693720 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @duckctochannel |
| Description | 🦆 Sending Telegram flocks to the meme culture on Solana Twitter: https://x.com/duckctoonsol Website: https://duckcto.xyz |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/duckctochannel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 136,967 | -178 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 137,145 | -159 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 137,304 | -226 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 137,530 | -154 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 137,684 | -161 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 137,845 | -178 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 138,023 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 138,034 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 138,034 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,844 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,268 | 44.6% | |
| ❤ | 691 | 24.3% | |
| 🔥 | 482 | 16.9% | |
| 🥰 | 180 | 6.33% | |
| 😁 | 80 | 2.81% | |
| 👎 | 64 | 2.25% | |
| 👏 | 63 | 2.22% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 0.176% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 0.176% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.105% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.105% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,844reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2024 to 21 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎤 "Another day, another celeb launching a meme coin… Who’s next?" 🦆 I’m waiting for the grandma from Titanic to drop her own coin. #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO More details : https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1902934663884427513
🍾5❤4👍1
📊 "While others watch, $CTO holders win." #Solana #DUCKCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1873737888883765279
👍135😁80👏12🔥10
🎄 "Christmas dips are for cookies, not $CTO!" 📈 The post-holiday moonshot is here. Quack in or miss out! #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1872326993259446722
❤13👍12👎6
🎁 "Santa delivered the bag of $CTO!" 💰 Wallet status: FULL OF HOLIDAY SPIRIT AND GAINS. #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871988652148134227
👍12🥰8👎2
🎄 "While others decorated with lights, we decorated with moonshots." $CTO: The tree that grows your portfolio! #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871866463453327702
❤8👎4
🍗 Grandma’s turkey? Meh. 📈 $DuckCTO’s pump? DELICIOUS. #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871492720411464094
❤3👍2👎1
🎅 Santa’s most requested gift this year? $DuckCTO. 🎁 Don’t wait for next Christmas – quack into the gains now! #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871474471229591954
👍3
🍗 Grandma’s turkey? Meh. 📈 $DuckCTO’s pump? DELICIOUS. #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871452118839886276
❤3👍2
🎅 Me: "Gonna relax this Christmas." 💻 Also me: "JUST ONE MORE QUACKTRACTION REPORT!" 💰 $DuckCTO: Where Christmas gains never go on holiday. More details: https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871143572239778207 #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO
👍9🔥5
🧠 Brain: "🎁 Buy Christmas presents." ❤️ Heart: "🦆 Buy $DuckCTO and everyone gets Lambo keys next year!" More details : https://x.com/DuckCTOonSol/status/1871113728403619938 #Solana $SOL #DUCKCTO $DCTO
👎7👍4
🔥 New Event: Top $DUCKS Earnings | Round 1 💰 Hey duckies, we’re super excited to kick off this event just for you, packed with awesome and exciting rewards! 🎁 Total Prize: 50 $TON (Top 5 $DUCKS Earners on the Leaderboard will share the Total Prize) 🗓 Duration: 3 days (12:00 09/07/2024 UTC - 12:00 09/10/2024 UTC) TO REGISTER FOR THIS EVENT, duckies complete the easy tasks below 👇 1️⃣ Boost for $DUCKS Channel 2️⃣ Li…
👍697❤464🔥390🥰137👏28👎25
📱 All-New $DUCKS App: Fresh Look, New Events 💪🏻 Duckies can now hop in the $DUCKS App and explore the awesome updated interface. 🥳 👉 What's new, check it out: https://t.me/duckscoop_bot/app?startapp=Nl7L10N976 Play smart, stack your $DUCKS, and get ready for a chance to get some thrilling rewards soon! 🎁 View on X: https://x.com/DuckCoop_TG/status/1832419395425202244 📱 DUCKS X | 📱 DUCKS App
👍52❤50👎12
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @duckctochannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,147,972 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@duckctochannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Duck CTO Channel” (@duckctochannel), 136,967 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/duckctochannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.