This game was a blast. All won. Congratulations to us. 🤭
❤35🔥34👍33

Channel
@TheChrisClan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,466subscribers
-2,566 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001709167120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheChrisClan |
| Description | Home of Gems and Web3 insights. Sharing absolute actionable alpha by Chris OG and community. For Campaigns, Support and Collaboration, reach out to: @ChrisOG |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheChrisClan |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:31 | 25,466 | -56 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 25,522 | -55 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 25,577 | -53 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 25,630 | -69 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 25,699 | -42 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 25,741 | -50 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 25,791 | -62 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 25,853 | -123 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 25,976 | -216 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 06:59 | 26,192 | -295 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 26,487 | -647 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 27,134 | -98 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 27,232 | -100 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 27,332 | -76 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 27,408 | -108 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 27,516 | -145 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 27,661 | -189 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 27,850 | -86 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 27,936 | -69 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:08 | 28,005 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (11 August 2026 – 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 85,870 |
| Reactions total | 3,298 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 06:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,097 reactions across 47 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,653 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 985 | 19.3% | |
| 🔥 | 967 | 19.0% | |
| 💯 | 574 | 11.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 350 | 6.87% | |
| 😍 | 315 | 6.18% | |
| 👏 | 252 | 4.94% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,097 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheChrisClan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2026 to 20 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
This game was a blast. All won. Congratulations to us. 🤭
❤35🔥34👍33
Got on this. A self declared micronation located between Croatia and Serbia. Going viral. https://dexscreener.com/solana/FocDS3JcdafCX4nFkDZkw4sKwBv5jZm6WRGSZLjZpTdq
👍37🔥33❤32
MARKET SENTIMENT 📊 Currently, the market is in a consolidation phase. This is not the time to go all in or force trades just to feel productive. Sometimes, the best thing you can do is step back, observe the market, and learn from what is happening. This is a period to study price action, document patterns, understand how different metas behave, and prepare for the next opportunity. Rather than repeatedly experimen…
🔥78👍66❤59👏2
I took this game. To be played from tomorrow till 18th. Join me: http://stake.com/?c=ChrisOG&offer=chrisog
🔥56👍51❤47
We won this. Congratulations. Happy Sunday.
💯77👍71❤🔥58❤55🔥50
I just placed this game to be played tomorrow. 50% profit if it plays out. More than 70% probability it plays out. Join me at: stake.com/?c=ChrisOG&offer=chrisog
❤30😍28👍27💯26🔥24❤🔥19
Check your whitelist status here. Share in DM. https://fungolabs.org/checker/?nominate=1
❤48💯46❤🔥45🔥44👍42😍29
Zama previous nft did well. From free mint to over $600. They're back with another nft project. Apply for WL here. Rooting for you always. https://fungolabs.org/apply/
👍47❤🔥45😍45💯41❤40🔥40
7x on POD. PODCAT did $30k ATH. about 5x from call. I need POD at $1m+ for a proper Podcat run. Posted on X https://x.com/_ChrisOG/status/2106308016039510062 Check thesis
👍61🔥55❤🔥54❤52😍52💯31
Blast is shutting down, kindly move your funds off the blockchain. Stay close more to exchanges you operate,their socials.
👍42❤40😍39💯38🔥26❤🔥25
I dropped and alpha, low cap gem and cat meta. https://x.com/_ChrisOG/status/2105902184030191772 Let's see. Like and retweet.
🔥53😍46💯42👍40❤39❤🔥38
Happy new month guys. This month, do something for me; 1. Try to develop your own personal strategy and conviction you can be trading with. 2. Stick with it 3. Do a couple things to get more attention to yourself and online presence. 4. Connect with 2-3 Chads and likeminds 5. Risk on trades I drop on Twitter (if we lose we lose, if we win we win big) 6. Remind yourself daily Jesus is king and both risk and luck mat…
❤47🔥42👍40😍35❤🔥29💯25
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @TheChrisClan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHRIS CLAN” (@TheChrisClan), 25,466 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheChrisClan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.