Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌍 Info 288 - INTERNACIONAL

@info288

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,526subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001170592796
TypeChannel
Username@info288
Description🌍 Actualidad internacional 🇪🇸 Noticias nacionales ➡️ @info288_nacional 🔎Seguimientos ➡️ @info288_seguimientos 🤡 La actualidad en memes ➡️ @info_memesdeluxe 🐦 www.twitter.com/info288
Created8 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/info288

Growth

9,5269,5339,529.56 August 2026 — 9,533 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,532 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,526 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,525–9,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:019,526-6
6 Aug 2026, 18:409,532-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:179,533first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 9,526 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,080
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held38 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total79,010
Reactions total1,210
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,730
Videos
5,790
Links
39,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,161 reactions across 36 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣57349.4%
👍46039.6%
🤬1119.56%
😢171.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC900 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇮🇷 El secretario del Consejo Supremo de Seguridad Nacional de Irán, Mohsen Rezai: El Estrecho de Ormuz permanecerá cerrado hasta que Estados Unidos cambie su comportamiento y acepte las condiciones de Irán. 🌍 http://t.me/info288

🤣7👍4

10 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC≈1,480 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🚢🇸🇦 Más de 15 petroleros vinculados a Arabia Saudita, en su mayoría VLCCs (petroleros de muy gran tamaño) y mayormente vacíos, se dirigen al noroeste, hacia Omán/Emiratos Árabes Unidos y el Golfo Pérsico. El transporte marítimo saudí se encuentra atrapado entre dos puntos críticos de riesgo: Bab-el-Mandeb, donde las amenazas de los hutíes hacen que el tránsito por el Mar Rojo sea peligroso, y el Estrecho de Ormuz.

👍4🤣4

10 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC≈1,380 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸 Trump sobre el Estrecho de Ormuz: Está abierto ahora... Controlamos el estrecho al 100%. 🌍 http://t.me/info288

🤣14👍2

10 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,300 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump exige reparaciones a Irán, después de que Irán exigiera reparaciones a Estados Unidos: Veo que los representantes de la República Islámica de Irán están pidiendo una indemnización por los daños que han sufrido durante los últimos cinco meses de conflicto militar (que se inició porque NO VAN A TENER UN ARMA NUCLEAR), ¡a pesar de que eso nunca se mencionó en ninguna de nuestras negociaciones ni reuniones! P

🤣9👍5🤬1

10 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump exige reparaciones a Irán, después de que Irán exigiera reparaciones a Estados Unidos: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117072168149236615 🌍 http://t.me/info288

🤣11👍3

10 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC≈1,300 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇨🇴 Al menos 111 muertos y 87 heridos en el terremoto de magnitud 7,4 en Colombia El presidente de Colombia, Abelardo de la Espriella, informó de que el terremoto de magnitud 7,4 que sacudió este lunes la mayor parte del país, ha causado al menos 111 fallecidos y una gran destrucción en al menos cinco departamentos. "A las 12:30 (17:30 GMT) teníamos 111 fallecidos, 87 heridos, 1.575 viviendas averiadas, 37 completam

😢13🤣1

10 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,490 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇺🇸🛢 Las reservas de petróleo crudo de la Reserva Estratégica de Petróleo de EE.UU disminuyeron por debajo de los 300 millones de barriles, alcanzando los 298,7 millones, su nivel más bajo desde 1983 🌍 http://t.me/info288

🤣6👍5🤬1

10 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,660 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇮🇹🇩🇰 Italia y Dinamarca se unen contra "la inmigración descontrolada": "Cometen delitos violentos, trafican con drogas o son responsables de violencia sexual" La primera ministra italiana, Giorgia Meloni, y su homóloga danesa, Mette Frederiksen, publicaron este lunes un comunicado conjunto en el que rechazan "la inmigración descontrolada" y piden centros de repatriación en terceros países. Las mandatarias aseguran

👍60

9 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC≈1,750 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇮🇪👳🏾‍♂️ Fuentes de seguridad alertan de un supuesto plan del Nuevo IRA contra inmigrantes en Irlanda Fuentes de seguridad citadas por el Daily Mail aseguran que el Nuevo IRA podría estar preparando una campaña de intimidación y violencia contra inmigrantes en Irlanda. Según esa información, el grupo pretendería aprovechar el creciente malestar social en torno a la inmigración y dirigir un ultimátum contra personas

👍43🤬1

8 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈2,030 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇮🇹👳🏾‍♂️🇪🇸 Italia rechaza a 15 inmigrantes ilegales procedentes de España Este hallazgo inicial fue publicado por La Verità, que cita detenciones en cinco aeropuertos diferentes: Linate, Malpensa, Bolonia, Turín y Orio al Serio. «Se trata de ciudadanos extracomunitarios sin permiso para transitar por territorio italiano. Aún no se ha podido determinar si entre estos 15 inmigrantes ilegales se encontraban personas qu

👍62🤣9🤬2

7 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC≈1,560 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Info288_nacional

🇪🇸👳🏾‍♂️🇮🇹 El Gobierno restablece los controles fronterizos a los viajeros procedentes de Italia #GobiernoXV #Exteriores #Italia #Ceuta #Inmigración ◾ El Gobierno ha acordado restablecer de manera temporal los controles en las fronteras interiores de puertos y aeropuertos para los viajeros procedentes de Italia ante "la persistente presión migratoria irregular que sufre el país transalpino". ◾ Estos controles fronte

🤣41👍2

7 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,820 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🇲🇦👳🏾‍♂️🇪🇸 Marruecos eleva a 14 los muertos y 236 los heridos en la invasión a Ceuta Al menos 14 personas murieron en el lado marroquí de la frontera y otras 236 resultaron heridas durante la avalancha migratoria de la semana pasada en los alrededores de la ciudad autónoma española de Ceuta, según un nuevo balance preliminar difundido este viernes por las autoridades marroquíes. 🌍 http://t.me/info288

🤣15

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @info288. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 25,565 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wall Street Wolverine
@wallstwolverine · 180,198
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
Alvise Pérez
@Alviseperez · 623,221
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Vito Quiles 🇪🇸
@vitoquilestelegram · 151,845
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌍 Info 288 - INTERNACIONAL” (@info288), 9,526 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/info288.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.