International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 51 days, net -259. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,658–35,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 00:36
35,697
-73
19 Sept 2026, 06:19
35,770
-38
16 Sept 2026, 17:56
35,808
+16
14 Sept 2026, 19:20
35,792
-24
11 Sept 2026, 08:58
35,816
-35
8 Sept 2026, 16:56
35,851
+1
5 Sept 2026, 09:20
35,850
-44
3 Sept 2026, 13:22
35,894
-14
2 Sept 2026, 04:24
35,908
+59
1 Sept 2026, 05:53
35,849
-19
31 Aug 2026, 02:35
35,868
-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:24
35,871
+34
29 Aug 2026, 06:36
35,837
+12
28 Aug 2026, 07:18
35,825
-9
27 Aug 2026, 08:03
35,834
+18
26 Aug 2026, 05:43
35,816
+3
25 Aug 2026, 03:43
35,813
-17
23 Aug 2026, 18:53
35,830
-15
22 Aug 2026, 02:04
35,845
-19
20 Aug 2026, 18:28
35,864
first reading
Engagement
544 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 35,697 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,630
287 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
287
of 544 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
544 (4 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
1,040,875
Reactions total
64,097
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 05:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈30,800
Videos
≈30,900
Links
≈53,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 01m
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 279 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
122,457 reactions across 543 posts, in 68 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
28,300
23.1%
❤
26,270
21.5%
🔥
12,121
9.90%
👏
11,761
9.60%
🤣
8,255
6.74%
😁
7,838
6.40%
🤬
5,129
4.19%
🍾
2,892
2.36%
🫡
2,708
2.21%
🤡
2,535
2.07%
🤮
2,507
2.05%
💯
1,818
1.48%
💩
1,221
0.997%
🤔
1,024
0.836%
🏆
799
0.652%
👌
611
0.499%
😡
572
0.467%
🎉
571
0.466%
🥰
504
0.412%
🤩
448
0.366%
48 further kinds
4,573
3.73%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 543 of the 544 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122,457 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 544 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 543 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wofnon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 544 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❗️El ejército ruso🇷🇺 continúa, de forma "rutinaria", por 32 días atacando objetivos de la OTAN / ucraniana🇺🇦 con drones kamikaze "Geran".
Se han realizado ataques contra Kiev, Odesa, la región de Kiev, la región de Odesa y Vinnytsia.
👉 Qué divertido... Zelensky(🇮🇱) habló de 40 días de presión de la Federación Rusa para lograr la paz, todo en orden.
Atte Admin
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon…
🪖Kiev🇺🇦 bajo ataque de las Fuerzas Armadas de la Federación Rusa🇷🇺: un fuerte incendio se ha desatado en la zona de Lukyanivka (donde se encuentra el centro de detención de la SBU).
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
🪖Trabajo nocturno de los grupos móviles de defensa aérea rusos🇷🇺 en algún lugar. La OTAN(🇬🇧🇺🇸) emplea enjambres de drones en su mayoría alemanes, checos y británicos en la noche para dificultar su derribó.
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
❗️Parece que un nuevo depósito de municiones clandestino de la OTAN(🇬🇧🇺🇸) ha sido destruido en Kiev🇺🇦 tras un ataque con drones rusos🇷🇺 "Geran".
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
👉 En un mundo paralelo, me encontré con una publicación de una página MAGA, con esta imagen... Llamando a Trump traidor y las estupideces que uno siempre lee con sus lectores aleluyas e ignorantes que piensan que el dinero y las ciencias económicas son capitalistas, que piensan que judaísmo es igual a sionismo y que el pobre es pobre porque quiere... 🥵😁
En fin, no es que esa gente analice mucho, pero son fanáticos, …
❗️Los "Gerán" rusos🇷🇺 neutralizan la defensa antiaérea ucraniana🇺🇦.
Los equipos de drones de ataque "Gerán-4 siker" han atacado tres estaciones de radar y un lanzador del sistema S-300 de las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania en las regiones de Nikoláyev, Odesa y Kiev.
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
👉 También existen "Generales de Play Station" en Rusia🇷🇺. Menos que en LATAM, eso sí.
Hoy, dio Lavrov el discurso oficial de la Federación Rusa en la ONU🇺🇳, habló del encuentro en Anchorage entre Trump(🇺🇸) y Putin(🇷🇺). Donde no hubo ningún acuerdo firmado y lo hemos explicado, pero si hubo un intercambio de posiciones que hasta hoy en día nadie sabe (NADIE). Lavrov le llamó "acuerdo", y algunos en los canales rusos …
❗ Rusia🇷🇺 ante la ONU🇺🇳: “Los objetivos de la operación militar especial se alcanzarán y las amenazas a la seguridad de Rusia serán eliminadas".
👉 Lo venimos diciendo: aquí habrá capitulación. Los rusos a su ritmo y dejando que la OTAN(🇬🇧🇺🇸) se desgaste. Los recursos los tiene Rusia (muchísimos más que todos esos parias juntos)
Atte Admin
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Sionismo #Pa…
❗ Rusia🇷🇺 ante la ONU🇺🇳: “Moscú se opone a la membresía permanente en el Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU de Alemania🇩🇪 y Japón🇯🇵, que han optado por la militarización y el revanchismo".
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Sionismo #Palestina #wofnon
❗ Rusia🇷🇺 ante la ONU🇺🇳: “Rusia está convencida de que ha llegado el momento de garantizar la soberanía de Palestina🇵🇸".
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Sionismo #Palestina #wofnon
❗ Rusia🇷🇺 ante la ONU🇺🇳: “Insistimos en la liberación inmediata del presidente Nicolás Maduro(🇻🇪) y su esposa”.
👉 El "viejo zorro" Lavrov nos da cátedra de diplomacia... Los rusos lo miden todo, la frace es contra Trump, contra los yankies, nada más.
Atte Admin
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #EEUU #wofnon
🪖En la geopolitica es imperativo mirar hacia atrás para analizar el presente. En el 2015 el presidente ruso, Vladimir Putin🇷🇺 le decía al mundo que al rededor de 40 países financiaban a los yihadistas corta cabezas de ISIS🐀... Todos sabemos quienes eran (OTAN🇺🇸🇬🇧 y sus aliados), la inteligencia rusa lo sabía perfectamente.
Que la gente perezosa no quiera darse cuenta, es problema de ellos...
👉Hoy, algunos se "sorpr…
👍104💯28👌12❤11👏3👨💻2🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 544 posts we hold for @wofnon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@wofnon edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
🟥 CAPITALISMO ES BARBARIE / antiimperialismo/solidaridad con Palestina, Cuba... Repudio a la agresión imperialista contra Irán @capitalismoesbarbarie · 6,932#66
VAMOS A RUSIA🇷🇺🏃🏻♂️|HISTORIA • NOTICIAS • VIAJES • CULTURA • URSS @vamosarusia · 16,734#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Guerras y Geopolíticas 🚀🔥 @guerrasygeo · 83,117 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
ENTRE GUERRAS @entre_guerras · 136,414 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
El Resumen Militar @elresumenmilitar · 26,915 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
⚔️ 𝔄𝔯𝔰 𝔅𝔢𝔩𝔩𝔦 ⚔️ guerra ucrania @Ars_belli · 37,106 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Irina 🇷🇺 @Irinamar_Z · 78,099 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvaALV · 71,350 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Blanco, azul y rojo (Rusia, cultura rusa, Putin, política rusa) @BlancoAzulRojo · 23,296 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Victor Ternovsky @victorternovsky · 24,752 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
DiegoEnLaLucha @diegoenlalucha · 74,669 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Liu Sivaya @liusivaya · 129,212 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Frente del Este @FrentedelEste · 20,723 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL @nuevo_orden_mundial_canal · 23,797 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
El Ojo 👁 Noticias |Guerra en Irán| Guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania | China | EE.UU. | Putin | Trump | Venezuela @elOJOen · 84,926 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia @atodapotencia · 43,331 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Cubadebate @cubadebate · 73,439 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
TASS - Agencia rusa de noticias @tass_es · 36,661 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Líneas Rojas | ÚLTIMA HORA | GUERRAS 2026 @lineasrojas · 41,932 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Inna Afinogenova @inafinogenova · 75,226 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
El Necio @elnecio_cuba · 24,257 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Noticias UKR 24 @UKR_token · 40,602 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Ucraniando @ucraniando · 37,553 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
InfoDefenseESPAÑOL @infodefSPAIN · 30,590 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
ROKOT | TORMENTA @surf_noise_sp · 22,149 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Ruben Gisbert @rubengisbertoficial · 72,895 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 60 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wofnon” (@wofnon), 35,697 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wofnon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.