International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,093 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net -762. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,080–36,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 04:19
35,194
-24
8 Nov 2026, 16:05
35,218
-22
7 Nov 2026, 08:45
35,240
-4
6 Nov 2026, 10:49
35,244
-18
5 Nov 2026, 11:25
35,262
-19
4 Nov 2026, 08:10
35,281
-4
3 Nov 2026, 06:19
35,285
+23
2 Nov 2026, 02:50
35,262
+4
1 Nov 2026, 05:40
35,258
-13
31 Oct 2026, 02:17
35,271
-12
29 Oct 2026, 22:35
35,283
-7
29 Oct 2026, 01:59
35,290
-2
27 Oct 2026, 02:08
35,292
-12
25 Oct 2026, 22:56
35,304
-17
24 Oct 2026, 23:39
35,321
-21
23 Oct 2026, 22:54
35,342
-12
22 Oct 2026, 23:16
35,354
-8
21 Oct 2026, 22:27
35,362
-13
20 Oct 2026, 18:41
35,375
-14
19 Oct 2026, 15:00
35,389
first reading
Engagement
1,178 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.65%
avg views ÷ 35,194 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,040
409 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
409
of 1,178 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
1,178 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
1,244,490
Reactions total
66,135
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈31,100
Videos
≈31,200
Links
≈53,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5h 38m
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 496 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
190,562 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 73 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
45,451
23.9%
❤
36,188
19.0%
🔥
19,735
10.4%
👏
19,654
10.3%
😁
12,393
6.50%
🤣
11,402
5.98%
🤬
8,288
4.35%
🍾
5,176
2.72%
🤡
4,457
2.34%
🤮
4,387
2.30%
🫡
4,136
2.17%
💯
2,667
1.40%
💩
2,447
1.28%
🤔
1,606
0.843%
🥰
1,005
0.527%
🎉
850
0.446%
🤪
794
0.417%
👌
731
0.384%
🥱
689
0.362%
🥴
680
0.357%
53 further kinds
7,826
4.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190,562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wofnon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,940
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,390
over 999 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
ianamente
1
6 October 2026
6 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 47 of 409 posts held from the last 30 days (11.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🪖Los servicios de seguridad de la FSB de Rusia🇷🇺 en la región de Kaliningrado han detenido las actividades de la inteligencia polaca🇵🇱.
Dos agentes del Servicio de Inteligencia Militar y de la Agencia de Seguridad Interna de Polonia han sido arrestados bajo sospecha de espionaje.
A otros siete ciudadanos polacos y tres rusos se les ha advertido sobre la inadmisibilidad de acciones de espionaje y traición.
Los agen…
🪖Los buques tanque rusos🇷🇺 que transportaban combustible a Estados Unidos🇺🇸 se ven obligados a regresar debido a las posibles consecuencias legales para las empresas estadounidenses que trabajan con diésel ruso.
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
👉Me pregunto como le irá a la "Izquierda" en España🇪🇦 en las próximas elecciones....
Atte Admin
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#España #wofnon
🪖Imágenes de operaciones de drones rusos🇷🇺 "Geran" y municiones kamikaze "Lancet" contra buques ucranianos🇺🇦 y lanchas no tripuladas en el Mar Negro.
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
Antes de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. El ejército ruso contaba con una escuela de engaño, activa desde 1904 y disuelta en 1929. Mientras tanto, el engaño militar se desarrolló como doctrina militar en la década de 1920. La directiva soviética de 1924 para los altos mandos establecía que el engaño operacional debía basarse en los principios de actividad, naturalidad, diversidad y continuidad, e incluir el secreto, la im…
El significado evolucionó en la práctica y la doctrina soviéticas para abarcar objetivos estratégicos, políticos y diplomáticos; en otras palabras, operar en todos los niveles.
Esto difiere de las doctrinas occidentales sobre el engaño y de las doctrinas de la guerra de la información, por su énfasis en los aspectos pragmáticos. Según el analista James Hansen, el engaño «se trata como un arte operacional que deben p…
Pequeños equipos (a los que yo también pertenecía) corren de un refugio a otro, de un arbusto a otro. Ojos y oídos siempre dirigidos al cielo.
Vehículos rápidos, cubiertos con jaulas, son, junto con los NRK, los únicos vehículos que aún se ven en el frente. Pero incluso ellos se convierten en objetivos de drones en espera. Los vehículos blindados pesados —entre ellos más de 1.000 tanques (de combate de infantería) d…
Foto: *** Trilateral: que tiene tres lados o partes, discusiones trilaterales. Anfitriones, EAU, mediadores (EEUU), las partes, Rusia y Ucrania ¿alguien ve la bandera de la Unión Europea o de Francia?
📬Nota fuente: Fidelista por siempre
📲(https://t.me/wofnon)
📍Invita a un conocido 👉 Wofnon
#Rusia #Ucrania #EEUU #OTAN #wofnon
Buenos días, a todos (as) los (as) camaradas. La Habana, Cuba. Primer territorio libre en América. 08:19, buenas Fidel
Estos son los datos de hoy, para las 10:00 am: * No se los salten, porque están actualizados todos los días y es lo que mueve al mundo hoy, para bien o para mal.*
1.- 40 billones 616 mil 500 millones (40.616.500.000.000) 4 billones 240 mil 400 millones exclusivamente de Trump en un año y 294 días (…
1.- Ayer, al mentiroso patológico ministro de relaciones exteriores de Macon, dijo esto: Francia asegura que europeos estarán presentes en negociaciones sobre Ucrania en Abu Dabi
París, 10 nov (EFE).- El ministro de Exteriores francés, Jean-Noël Barrot, afirmó este martes que Francia, Reino Unido y Alemania estarán presentes en las conversaciones sobre Ucrania previstas hoy en Abu Dabi y rechazó que los países europ…
No saben cómo retirarse, en la guerra moderna, no conozco ninguna, que no se haya disputado en el terreno, ni una sola. Si al final, toda guerra, incluyendo las religiosas, se refieren y son él objetivos, territorios y ya.
Hay mucha gente que se pregunta por los frentes, Zaporizhia, Dnipro, y sobre todo, lo que queda del Donbass, es decir, Kramatorsk y Sloviansk. Pero no voy a responder con mis dichos, y la maskirov…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,178 posts we hold for @wofnon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@wofnon edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Con el Fantasma de Kiev, por culpa de la 4T, o por estrechar la mano con otro mandatario9%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 21 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
🟥 CAPITALISMO ES BARBARIE / antiimperialismo/solidaridad con Palestina, Cuba... Repudio a la agresión imperialista contra Irán @capitalismoesbarbarie · 6,882#66
VAMOS A RUSIA🇷🇺🏃🏻♂️|HISTORIA • NOTICIAS • VIAJES • CULTURA • URSS @vamosarusia · 17,901#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Guerras y Geopolíticas 🚀🔥 @guerrasygeo · 82,681 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
ENTRE GUERRAS @entre_guerras · 135,305 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
El Resumen Militar @elresumenmilitar · 26,542 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 September 2026
⚔️ 𝔄𝔯𝔰 𝔅𝔢𝔩𝔩𝔦 ⚔️ guerra ucrania @Ars_belli · 36,456 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Irina 🇷🇺 @Irinamar_Z · 77,437 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvaALV · 70,748 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Blanco, azul y rojo (Rusia, cultura rusa, Putin, política rusa) @BlancoAzulRojo · 21,852 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Victor Ternovsky @victorternovsky · 24,517 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 September 2026
DiegoEnLaLucha @diegoenlalucha · 72,865 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Liu Sivaya @liusivaya · 127,052 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Frente del Este @FrentedelEste · 20,631 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
NUEVO ORDEN MUNDIAL @nuevo_orden_mundial_canal · 23,743 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
El Ojo 👁 Noticias |Guerra en Irán| Guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania | China | EE.UU. | Putin | Trump | Venezuela @elOJOen · 79,507 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
A Toda Potencia | Irán - Israel | Ucrania - Rusia @atodapotencia · 44,079 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Cubadebate @cubadebate · 71,849 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
TASS - Agencia rusa de noticias @tass_es · 36,640 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Líneas Rojas | ÚLTIMA HORA | GUERRAS 2026 @lineasrojas · 42,755 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Inna Afinogenova @inafinogenova · 74,160 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
El Necio @elnecio_cuba · 23,873 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
Noticias UKR 24 @UKR_token · 40,623 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 August 2026
Ucraniando @ucraniando · 37,470 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
InfoDefenseESPAÑOL @infodefSPAIN · 30,685 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
ROKOT | TORMENTA @surf_noise_sp · 22,063 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Ruben Gisbert @rubengisbertoficial · 72,055 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 62 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wofnon” (@wofnon), 35,194 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wofnon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.