Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -518. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,549–21,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:02
20,627
-13
15 Sept 2026, 19:54
20,640
-22
14 Sept 2026, 05:37
20,662
-16
12 Sept 2026, 16:20
20,678
-25
10 Sept 2026, 14:37
20,703
-31
7 Sept 2026, 11:57
20,734
-23
4 Sept 2026, 14:58
20,757
-20
3 Sept 2026, 00:38
20,777
-14
1 Sept 2026, 23:08
20,791
-30
31 Aug 2026, 20:08
20,821
-14
30 Aug 2026, 16:48
20,835
-14
29 Aug 2026, 16:43
20,849
-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:34
20,855
-14
27 Aug 2026, 18:04
20,869
-9
26 Aug 2026, 14:38
20,878
-11
25 Aug 2026, 17:32
20,889
-21
24 Aug 2026, 14:43
20,910
+8
22 Aug 2026, 22:24
20,902
+35
21 Aug 2026, 13:04
20,867
-9
20 Aug 2026, 13:34
20,876
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 20,627 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,400
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
46 (20 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
30,600
Reactions total
674
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
1m 10s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,360 reactions across 45 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
628
18.7%
🤡
363
10.8%
😁
313
9.32%
🤮
255
7.59%
🤔
247
7.35%
❤
215
6.40%
🔥
213
6.34%
🤬
177
5.27%
👎
155
4.61%
🤣
155
4.61%
💩
143
4.26%
👏
101
3.01%
🖕
51
1.52%
🙏
47
1.40%
👌
45
1.34%
🍾
44
1.31%
🍌
38
1.13%
😱
38
1.13%
🤯
38
1.13%
🌭
35
1.04%
12 further kinds
59
1.76%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸🇻🇪 El plan de $100.000 millones para reactivar la producción petrolera de Venezuela genera escepticismo entre ejecutivos del sector y expertos.
La iniciativa, impulsada por la administración de Donald Trump y la empresa North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP), contempla invertir cerca de $100.000 millones y elevar la producción de la compañía a más de un millón de barriles diarios.
Sin embargo, expertos advie…
🌎💰 Estas serán las mayores economías de América Latina en 2030, según proyecciones basadas en datos del FMI
Un análisis de Visual Capitalist, basado en las proyecciones del Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI), sitúa a Brasil como la mayor economía de LatAm en 2030, con un PIB estimado de 3,204 billones de dólares, lo que lo colocaría en el 8.º puesto mundial.
Le siguen México, con 2,549 billones de dólares y el 12.…
🇺🇸🇮🇷💰 ¿Cuánto le está costando a EE.UU. la guerra con Irán?
Seis meses después del inicio del conflicto, la factura ya asciende a decenas de miles de millones de dólares.
El Pentágono estimó en julio el coste en unos 37.500 millones de dólares, mientras que estimaciones internas lo situaron en hasta 100.000 millones o más.
Solo las municiones utilizadas han costado unos 26.000 millones de dólares. Además, el aumen…
🇦🇷🇬🇧🇮🇱 La explotación petrolera británica en Malvinas avanza pese a los reclamos de Argentina
La petrolera israelí Navitas Petroleum adquirió una segunda plataforma flotante de producción, almacenamiento y descarga (FPSO) por unos 125 millones de dólares para acelerar el desarrollo del yacimiento Sea Lion, ubicado al norte de las islas Malvinas.
La primera producción está prevista para 2028, mientras que la capacid…
🇺🇸🇻🇪 La administración Trump está negociando con el gobierno interino de Venezuela una posible participación de EE.UU. en varios de los principales yacimientos petroleros venezolanos, según informa Axios.
El acuerdo propuesto abarcaría más de una docena de yacimientos con alrededor de 90 mil millones de barriles de reservas probadas, no los 300 mil millones de barriles totales de Venezuela. A cambio, EE.UU. y otras …
🇨🇦🇺🇸 Canadá se enfrenta a una fuerte escalada de su guerra comercial con EE. UU.
The Economist advierte que Ottawa se encuentra en una posición mucho más vulnerable ante una guerra comercial a gran escala debido a la enorme dependencia de Canadá del mercado estadounidense.
Tras el fracaso de las negociaciones, Washington impuso aranceles adicionales del 50 % a unos 20.000 millones de dólares en productos canadiense…
🏗 China activa un fondo de 800.000 millones de yuanes para nuevos proyectos
China ha comenzado a aceptar solicitudes para un mecanismo de financiación valorado en 800.000 millones de yuanes, unos 119.000 millones de dólares. El capital se destinará como financiación inicial para proyectos de infraestructura y sectores estratégicos.
La iniciativa busca atraer también recursos de bancos y entidades privadas, con la p…
🇨🇳🇮🇷🇺🇸 China rechaza las amenazas de sanciones secundarias de EE. UU. por su comercio con Irán y advierte que adoptará "todas las medidas necesarias" para proteger sus intereses.
Pekín afirma que su cooperación económica con Irán se desarrolla dentro del marco del derecho internacional y no debe ser interferida.
El Ministerio de Exteriores chino también advirtió que la guerra económica y la política de "máxima pres…
🇺🇸🇨🇳 EE. UU. prepara un arancel del 7,5 % a productos chinos antes de la cumbre Xi-Trump
Estados Unidos se dispone a imponer un arancel adicional del 7,5 % a productos procedentes de China, alegando preocupaciones por la sobrecapacidad manufacturera del país asiático, informó Bloomberg citando a personas familiarizadas con el asunto.
La medida estaría prevista antes de la reunión entre el presidente estadounidense …
🇮🇷🇨🇳🇺🇸 El bloqueo de EE.UU. reduce drásticamente el petróleo iraní disponible para China
La oferta de crudo iraní para compradores chinos se ha reducido con fuerza en las últimas semanas debido al bloqueo estadounidense, mientras que los precios han comenzado a subir por la escasez de cargamentos.
Según datos citados por Reuters, las reservas iraníes en almacenamiento flotante cayeron de unos 105 millones a 80 mill…
🇺🇸🇮🇷 EE.UU. amenaza con sanciones a los países que mantengan vínculos económicos con Irán
El presidente Donald Trump anunció una nueva ofensiva económica contra Teherán y advirtió que cualquier país, empresa o institución que ayude a Irán a evadir las sanciones estadounidenses enfrentará "tremendas consecuencias económicas".
Por su parte, el secretario del Tesoro, Scott Bessent, afirmó que los aliados de Washington…
🖕35🤮29🤡16❤7💩6👎2🙏2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @DepreEconomica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DepreEconomica named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@depreeconomicac named in 10 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Un día como hoy @undiacomo · 29,559 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
La señal curiosa @Curiosa_Senal · 34,022 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 September 2026
Billonario @ibillonario · 52,456 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Buzz 💬 Citas @buzzcitas · 63,217 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
tech lado - IA, ChatGPT, tecnología, robots @techladotech · 30,623 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Gustavo Petro @gustavopetrooficial · 22,620 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 September 2026
Happy Wellness @bienestar · 25,537 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
Trabajar por el Mundo @trabajarporelmundo · 28,423 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Ecoinventos @ecoinventos · 26,467 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 September 2026
📚 DATOS CURIOSOS 🔍 @DatosCuriosos · 32,044 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
¡Ahí les va! @ahilesvaALV · 71,350 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
¡Hay que verlo! @hayqverlo · 24,050 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
ROLLO CHINO @rollo_chino · 27,730 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Buzz 📚 Historia @buzzhistoria · 75,512 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Filipe Macroval @filicrovaltg · 21,698 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 September 2026
Blanco, azul y rojo (Rusia, cultura rusa, Putin, política rusa) @BlancoAzulRojo · 23,510 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 September 2026
Cosas que no sabías💡 @curiosidadesss · 50,815 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Sabias que? @sabiasqueoficial · 37,903 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
ATRACCIÓN MENTAL🧠 @atraccionmental · 26,454 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 September 2026
El Ojo 👁 Noticias |Guerra en Irán| Guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania | China | EE.UU. | Putin | Trump | Venezuela @elOJOen · 84,926 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
Alejandro Martinez @alejandromartinez · 21,965 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 September 2026
VEHICULAR CAOS @vehicularcaos · 23,146 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 19 September 2026
IA VIAJERO 🤖 @IAVIAJERO · 35,316 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
Cripto Escena🇪🇸 @CriptoEscena · 90,574 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Depresión económica (Economía, crisis, dólar, finanzas de América Latina, México, Argentina y del mundo)” (@DepreEconomica), 20,627 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DepreEconomica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.