Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Geopolitica Sin Censura en España y Latinoamerica

@GeoSinCen

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,173subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001691386753
TypeChannel
Username@GeoSinCen
DescriptionLas noticias más recientes del mundo al instante
Created19 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GeoSinCen

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

18,17318,30318,2386 August 2026 — 18,303 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,303 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,284 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,266 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,249 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,231 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,195 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,173 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,154–18,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:1318,173-22
11 Aug 2026, 22:2218,195-23
10 Aug 2026, 23:5518,218-13
9 Aug 2026, 23:3718,231-18
9 Aug 2026, 02:3018,249-17
8 Aug 2026, 04:2518,266-18
7 Aug 2026, 03:3418,284-19
6 Aug 2026, 02:1618,303no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:5518,303first reading

Engagement

142 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.82%
avg views ÷ 18,173 subscribers
Avg views / post
876
142 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.687%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
142
of 142 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 119 of 142 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held142 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total124,370
Reactions total801
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
29,000
Videos
12,300
Links
28,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22m 23s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

691 reactions across 103 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏9413.6%
🤮9113.2%
👍8312.0%
699.99%
👎659.41%
🔥568.10%
🤡395.64%
🖕355.07%
🤣284.05%
😈202.89%
🤬202.89%
🥰111.59%
🥴91.30%
😁81.16%
😭81.16%
😱81.16%
❤‍🔥50.724%
🦄50.724%
👌40.579%
😡40.579%
13 further kinds294.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 142 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 801reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 142 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC86 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸Pentagon Chief Pushes for $1.5 Trillion Military Budget to Keep the US “Dominant” on Earth US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth stated that the Trump administration is seeking a “historic and generational investment” in military spending through a new $1.5 trillion budget. “We will work as hard as we possibly can… to achieve what is truly a historic investment needed to ensure that the United States remains the do

12 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC82 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇺🇸Jefe del Pentágono impulsa un presupuesto militar de 1,5 billones de dólares para mantener a Estados Unidos “dominante” en la Tierra El secretario de Defensa de Estados Unidos, Pete Hegseth, afirmó que la administración Trump busca una “inversión histórica y generacional” en gastos militares a través de un nuevo presupuesto de 1,5 billones de dólares.“Trabajaremos lo más arduamente posible… para lograr lo que es v

12 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC748 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇩🇪🛍Alemania aprueba una pensión para que los niños desde 6 años ahorren para su jubilación El Gobierno alemán ha dado luz verde este miércoles al proyecto de ley de la “pensión de inicio temprano”, una iniciativa por la que el Estado pagará a todos los niños de Alemania desde los seis años 10 euros al mes para la jubilación privada hasta que cumplan los 18 años.Esta medida, que ya fue presentada en diciembre pasado

12 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇸🤩🤩⚠️Ceuta en vilo con amenaza de otra invasión masiva de Inmigrantes La ciudad autónoma española de Ceuta sigue hoy en vilo, con miles de inmigrantes todavía en la urbe que ingresaron de forma ilegal, bajo un proceso de repatriación rodeado de dudas.No se sabe con exactitud la cifra de individuos casi todos de origen marroquí, que permanecen en Ceuta, salvo la cantidad aproximada de mil 500 menores no acompañados.

12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC269 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺🔋Russia’s Pacific Fleet Tests “Unstoppable” Reconnaissance and Strike Combination Across Three Seas Forpost-RE reconnaissance and strike drones detected simulated enemy landing ships and transmitted their coordinates for missile strikes during ongoing exercises in the Sea of ​​Japan, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, and the Northwest Pacific, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense. The drones provided real-time reconna

12 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺🆒La Flota del Pacífico de Rusia prueba una combinación de reconocimiento y ataque “imparable” en tres mares Los drones de reconocimiento y ataque Forpost-RE detectaron buques de desembarco enemigos simulados y transmitieron sus coordenadas para ataques con misiles durante ejercicios en curso en el Mar de Japón, el Mar de Ojotsk y el noroeste del Pacífico, según el Ministerio de Defensa ruso.Los drones proporcionar

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC299 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

NATO blames Russia for drone incidents in Romania and Poland Following a meeting at the ambassadorial level, the NATO Council held Russia responsible for the drone incidents in Romania and Poland. The North Atlantic Council stated this in a press release. NATO countries held a North Atlantic Council meeting (at the ambassadorial level) on August 12 to discuss the latest airspace violations by Poland and Romania, as

🤡41👏1

12 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC450 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺🛡La OTAN responsabilizó a Rusia de los incidentes con drones ocurridos en Rumania y Polonia Tras una reunión a nivel de embajadores, el Consejo de la OTAN responsabilizó a Rusia de los incidentes con drones ocurridos en Rumania y Polonia. Así lo indicó el Consejo del Atlántico Norte en un comunicado.Los países de la OTAN celebraron una reunión del Consejo del Atlántico Norte (a nivel de embajadores) el 12 de agost

👎1

12 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC500 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸Pentágono no ve una amenaza para Estados Unidos y sus aliados en el lanzamiento de misiles por parte de Corea del Norte El lanzamiento de un misil balístico por parte de Corea del Norte hacia el Mar de Japón no representó una amenaza inmediata para Estados Unidos, su personal ni sus aliados, según declaró el Comando del Pacífico de Estados Unidos.“Estamos al tanto del reciente lanzamiento de misiles y mantenemos u

🤡3

12 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC260 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩☀️El abrasador verano europeo podría costar a las economías de la Unión Europea 180.000 millones de euros El calor extremo podría costar a las economías de la UE alrededor de 180.000 millones de euros este año, aproximadamente el 1% del PIB y casi exactamente el crecimiento que el bloque había previsto para 2026, siendo Francia el país miembro más afectado.Según un estudio publicado por Triodos Bank, la prolongada

😡2

12 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC967 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🇬🇧🤩La mayor compañía eléctrica del Reino Unido emite una advertencia sobre el eclipse solar Octopus Energy, la mayor compañía eléctrica doméstica del Reino Unido, ha pedido a sus clientes que reduzcan el consumo eléctrico durante dos horas el miércoles para hacer frente a un eclipse solar en plena demanda.El eclipse solar total, el primero visible desde Europa continental desde 1999, tendrá lugar el 12 de agosto e

👎1

12 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC289 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇷🇺Durante los ejercicios militares de Rusia el dron "Fortpost" guió un ataque de misiles "Onyx" contra los buques del "enemigo" en el Océano Pacífico.

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 142 posts we hold for @GeoSinCen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,779 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Geopolitica Sin Censura en España y Latinoamerica” (@GeoSinCen), 18,173 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeoSinCen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.