👉 Os recordamos que podéis poneros en contacto con nosotros y enviarnos fotos, vídeos, denuncias, etc., de forma totalmente anónima escribiendo a este perfil: @cduinfo12
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +302. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,586–28,979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 06:38
28,934
+22
10 Nov 2026, 03:04
28,912
+18
8 Nov 2026, 14:54
28,894
+12
6 Nov 2026, 09:44
28,882
-3
5 Nov 2026, 09:48
28,885
-4
4 Nov 2026, 11:29
28,889
+1
3 Nov 2026, 12:00
28,888
-4
2 Nov 2026, 11:19
28,892
-6
1 Nov 2026, 08:05
28,898
-5
31 Oct 2026, 09:10
28,903
+3
30 Oct 2026, 10:02
28,900
-2
29 Oct 2026, 08:58
28,902
+6
28 Oct 2026, 04:16
28,896
+6
26 Oct 2026, 01:46
28,890
+5
25 Oct 2026, 01:26
28,885
+13
24 Oct 2026, 00:36
28,872
+26
22 Oct 2026, 22:37
28,846
+8
21 Oct 2026, 20:51
28,838
+3
20 Oct 2026, 17:40
28,835
+4
19 Oct 2026, 17:16
28,831
first reading
Engagement
639 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 28,934 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,570
227 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.511%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
227
of 639 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
639 (1 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
1,491,960
Reactions total
7,624
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 13:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
242
Videos
64
Links
226
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 07m
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 78 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21,192 reactions across 636 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
9,621
45.4%
❤
3,980
18.8%
🫡
2,360
11.1%
👏
1,614
7.62%
👍
1,570
7.41%
🤩
1,248
5.89%
🎉
799
3.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 639 of the 639 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,471 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 639 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
58
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 639 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ciudadanosdeuniforme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 639 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 227 posts held from the last 30 days (1.32%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚠️ 𝗗𝗢𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗦𝗢𝗦 𝗬 𝗗𝗢𝗦 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗔𝗦 𝗘𝗡 𝗘𝗟 𝗥𝗧-𝟮𝟭
Un testimonio del RT-21 cuenta dos episodios protagonizados por un oficial.
El primero: durante unas maniobras, jugando con su pistola a poner y quitar el seguro, se le dispara el arma. Según el testimonio, no le ocurrió nada.
El segundo: otro día, al salir de la base, la policía local lo habría visto haciendo derrapes y tirando del freno de mano en cada curva. Solo recibió u…
🏥 𝗔𝗦𝗘𝗚𝗨𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗢 𝗗𝗘𝗟 𝗜𝗦𝗙𝗔𝗦, 𝗖𝗜𝗧𝗔 𝗗𝗘 𝗦𝗘𝗚𝗨𝗡𝗗𝗔
Nuevo testimonio, esta vez desde Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Según el testimonio, en una clínica de la ciudad hay cita si llamas como paciente particular. Pero al decir que eres de Asisa-ISFAS, la respuesta es que no. Una recepcionista lo confirmó en persona.
Un cupo para unos y otro para otros, con la misma cuota descontada cada mes de la nómina. El remitente asegura que no e…
🪖 𝗖𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗦 𝟭 𝗘𝗡 𝗟𝗢𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗢𝗦 𝗗𝗘 𝗖𝗨𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗘𝗟: 𝗟𝗔 𝗡𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗔 𝗡𝗢 𝗦𝗘 𝗖𝗨𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘
Cabos 1 del Grupo Logístico I de la Brigada «Aragón» I denuncian cómo se nombran los servicios de cuartel.
Según el testimonio, la norma interna solo permite completar los servicios con cabos 1 cuando los suboficiales disponibles bajan de 20. Aun así, entran de servicio todos los cabos 1.
El resultado, dicen, es que los sargentos y sargentos primeros se …
🥶 𝗘𝗡 𝗟𝗘𝗧𝗢𝗡𝗜𝗔, 𝗦𝗜𝗡 𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗢 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗔 𝗔𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗔𝗥𝗦𝗘
Militares del contingente desplegado en Letonia denuncian tres cosas en pleno frío extremo:
🧤 No se les permite usar el gorro ni las botas específicas que se entregan para esta misión.
🏃 El gimnasio por la mañana se limita a dos días. El resto, deporte obligatorio a las 6:30 en la calle.
🍽 En el segundo turno de comida muchos días no queda pescado y se come lo que sobra. A…
🚨 𝗨𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗘 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗡𝗢 𝗟𝗘 𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗘 𝗘𝗡 𝗘𝗟 𝗖𝗘𝗙𝗢𝗧
Un alumno del CEFOT de San Fernando (Cádiz) mide 1,80 y le han entregado uniformes de la talla 1C.
Según el testimonio, ha ido varias veces al almacén a pedir el cambio y la respuesta ha sido siempre la misma: no.
Resultado: hace la instrucción y el resto de cometidos con ropa que no le vale, y lo está pasando mal.
Le exigen disciplina y presencia, pero le dan un uniforme q…
🚨 𝗗𝗜𝗘𝗭 𝗠𝗘𝗦𝗘𝗦 𝗗𝗘 𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗔 𝗣𝗢𝗥 𝗨𝗡𝗔 𝗖𝗜𝗧𝗔 𝗗𝗘 𝗣𝗜𝗘𝗟
Un militar titular del ISFAS pide primera consulta de dermatología en un hospital de Zaragoza. Primer hueco libre: 27 de septiembre de 2027.
Hoy es 13 de noviembre de 2026. Más de diez meses para que un especialista le mire la piel.
¿Y si es un lunar que ha cambiado? Que espere. Eso sí, la cuota del ISFAS se descuenta puntual cada mes, y el concierto de 2027 ha quedado d…
🚨 𝗜𝗦𝗙𝗔𝗦: 𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗼́𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗼 𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗼, 𝗼 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼 𝗮𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗮
Ya son dos provincias.
▪️ Zaragoza (Adeslas): el centro canceló la cita presencial de dermatología del 19 de octubre. La aplicación avisa de que no hay profesionales con cita online y solo ofrece teledermatología, una valoración por foto. La nueva cita, según el testimonio, es para enero. Y no dejan pedir otra.
▪️ Sevilla: varios hospitales privados solo ofrecen tele…
🚨 𝗜𝗦𝗙𝗔𝗦 𝗲𝗻 𝗦𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮: 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮 𝗲𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗼́𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗼 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗼 𝘀𝗶 𝗽𝗮𝗴𝗮𝘀
Un militar de Sevilla nos cuenta que ha pedido cita de dermatología en varios hospitales privados de la ciudad y la respuesta ha sido siempre la misma:
▪️ Solo ofrecen teledermatología.
▪️ O el centro directamente no atiende a personal de ISFAS asignado a Asisa o Adeslas.
Y lo más llamativo: en uno de esos centros, pagando la cita de su bolsillo, lo atie…
🚨 𝗕𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗼́𝗻 𝗔𝗹𝗯𝘂𝗲𝗿𝗮 (𝗥𝗜 𝟰𝟵): 𝗺𝗮́𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗶𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘀 𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗼́𝗻 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗶́𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮
Nos cuentan que el descontento en el batallón es abismal y que mucha gente tiene ganas de marcharse.
Según el testimonio:
▪️ En maniobras, la prioridad son las mangas bien colocadas y el afeitado diario.
▪️ Ejercicios de tiro sin la protección balística adecuada, y se habría prohibido usar la propia a quien la tiene por no ser de dot…
🚨 𝗙𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗦𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗮 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶́𝗮: 𝗰𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗼 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗴𝘂𝗲𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗼𝘀 𝘆 𝗻𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝗻 𝗺𝗲́𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗼
Seguimos con la Santa María. Según el testimonio que nos llega de a bordo, la dotación va mejorando, pero al menos cuatro militares no remontan: continúan con diarrea y algunos con sangre.
Al entrar en puerto esta semana, a esos compañeros los habrían mandado a la cama. Sin llevarlos al médico y sin decirles qué tienen.
Lo que s…
¿Guardia, maniobras o fuera de casa el 29 de noviembre? Puedes votar igualmente, pero tienes que pedir el voto por correo como tarde el jueves 19.
Pídelo en cualquier oficina de Correos con tu DNI o en correos.es con DNI electrónico o certificado digital. Pon la dirección donde vayas a estar y entrégalo en Correos hasta el miércoles 25.
Compártelo en el grupo de tu unidad: a más de uno le salva el voto.
militaresco…
𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗬 𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗖𝗖𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗘𝗦 𝗗𝗘𝗟 𝟮𝟵𝗡: 𝗟𝗢 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗣𝗨𝗘𝗗𝗘𝗦 𝗬 𝗟𝗢 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗡𝗢
🚫 Compartir el vídeo de un candidato puede costarte un expediente por falta grave. Si estás en activo, la ley electoral lo castiga incluso como delito. Criticar también cuenta, y un perfil abierto es público.
✅ Puedes votar a quien quieras y hablar de política en privado.
🪖 ¿De guardia el 29? Tu mando tiene que facilitarte el voto.
📮 ¿De maniobras o lejos …
❤10👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 639 posts we hold for @ciudadanosdeuniforme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Las asociaciones profesionales deben asistir a actos y vinos del Ministerio?
Sí35%
No67%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 639 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SPE INFORMACIÓN @SPE112 · 25,049 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
POLICE FITNESS @policefitness · 22,043 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
TSA Noticias 🇪🇸 @TSANoticias · 62,653 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Alvise Pérez @Alviseperez · 600,535 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ciudadanos de Uniforme” (@ciudadanosdeuniforme), 28,934 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ciudadanosdeuniforme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.