Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

date ideas|психология отношений

@dateideasspp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

47,245subscribers

-158 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708143290
TypeChannel
Username@dateideasspp
DescriptionАвторский блог пары про отношения ВЛАДЕЛЕЦ/РЕКЛАМА: @anpastt (по рекламе сюда) биржа telega.in/channels/dateideasspp/card?r=MfJDbJGA РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6790cb63ee896061c9bea2ff
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dateideasspp

Growth

47,24547,40347,3247 August 2026 — 47,403 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,403 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,357 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,345 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,317 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,285 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,245 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -158. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,221–47,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:2247,245-40
11 Aug 2026, 06:4647,285-32
10 Aug 2026, 07:2147,317-28
9 Aug 2026, 09:1347,345-12
8 Aug 2026, 10:5447,357-46
7 Aug 2026, 12:0047,403no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:0147,403first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.19%
avg views ÷ 47,245 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,400
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held41 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total139,330
Reactions total9,649
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,770
Videos
1,240
Links
243

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 55s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,649 reactions across 41 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,38155.8%
💔1,28813.3%
🤣1,27613.2%
🤯5745.95%
👍3623.75%
🤔2462.55%
🥰2092.17%
😭1962.03%
🤝790.819%
😈230.238%
🫡150.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,649reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈1,120 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Идея для свидания на ближайшие дни — наблюдать за персеидами. (ежегодный августовский звездопад) Пару советов: 🩷Постарайтесь найти местечко, где как можно меньше фонарей. 🩷Смотрите на северо-запад(а еще лучше скачать приложения, которые подписывают на небе всё, например «Star walk», «Sky Guide») 🩷Одевайтесь теплее и берите термос с горячими напитками!! #date@dateideasspp

49🥰8👍5

12 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,950 views254 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Цветы или это?😀

190🤯40🤔15😭9

12 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈2,200 views173 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Стоп, на этом рилсе было слишком много репостов, это че правда, девочки?!!

98🤯48🤣25😈2

12 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈2,290 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Возможно, самое любопытное открытие этой недели 👀 Мы уже сто лет вместе, но тут наткнулись на информацию про сервис знакомств Вадеквате, который скоро запускается — и не удержались, изучили, что они готовят (да, так тоже можно, даже если вы пара 😅) Знакомство там строится не на бесконечном свайпинге, а на анкете и личности, а подбор — на ценностях, а не на внешности. Прямая противоположность тому свайп-марафону, ко

11👍2🤝2

12 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈2,510 views437 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Просто доверьтесь

341🤣71🤔16👍7💔2

11 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC≈2,910 views121 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Важные вопросы, которые стоит задать себе, перед тем, как вступить в отношения.🤩 🩷Как я себя чувствую рядом с этим человеком? 🩷Почему он мне нравится? 🩷Нравятся ли мне его знаки внимания? 🩷Какие у нас есть различия? Как я к ним отношусь? Смогу ли я их принять? 🩷Какие у меня и у него ожидания от отношений? Они сходятся? 🩷Не закрываю ли я глаза на тревожные звоночки? 🩷Мне нравится, какой я рядом с этим человеком?

121

11 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈3,010 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Норм или стрем: хранить список всех случаев, когда партнер облажался или поступил с вами неправильно?

  1. Норм, помогает не забывать, что происходило на самом деле.19%
  2. Стрем… Это странно и нездорово.77%
  3. Свой вариант в комментариях 🥴4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

38🤔16👍4🤯1

11 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈3,020 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Можно любить мужчину и совершенно не хотеть его. И нет, это не обязательно значит, что любовь закончилась Есть три разные вещи, которые мы часто смешиваем: ❤️Похоть — «я хочу секса». Сексуальное желание само по себе, без привязки к конкретному человеку. Связано с нашими либидо. ❤️ Влечение — «я хочу именно его». Бабочки, интерес, предвкушение, желание прикосновений. ❤️ Привязанность — «мне с ним хорошо». Доверие, т

🤣86

11 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈3,010 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я знаю что истории в тг создали что бы мы общались с бывшими, но не могу это доказать 😐

🤔105🤣5524🤯6🤝5

11 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈3,280 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я бы очень хотела иметь такой блог в подписках лет в 15. Или хотя бы чтобы его читали мои родители… Никита пишет о подростках и ситуациях, которые знакомы многим родителям: конфликты дома, первая любовь, дружба, личные границы, закрытость и проблемы с доверием. 🩷При этом всё объясняется достаточно простым языком, без ощущения, что тебя учат правильно воспитывать ребёнка. Мне особенно нравится, что подростковые пере

11🤣3🫡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @dateideasspp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,310 voters approx.

Норм или стрем: хранить список всех случаев, когда партнер облажался или поступил с вами неправильно?

  1. Норм, помогает не забывать, что происходило на самом деле.19%
  2. Стрем… Это странно и нездорово.77%
  3. Свой вариант в комментариях 🥴4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,260 voters approx.

Что выберете?

  1. Прожить вместе 20 счастливых лет и потом расстаться.53%
  2. Быть вместе всю жизнь, но отношения будут просто хорошими, без большой любви.47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 415,437
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
в тренде у девочек
@females · 581,631
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
Психология отношений
@Psychologs · 208,179
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 11 August 2026
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 721,422
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“date ideas|психология отношений” (@dateideasspp), 47,245 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dateideasspp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.