Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for woMan | про отношения

Channel

woMan | про отношения

@womanrelationships

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,183subscribers

-428 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001987678966
TypeChannel
Username@womanrelationships
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/womanrelationships

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,18313,61113,3977 August 2026 — 13,611 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,605 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,598 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,586 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,573 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,569 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,561 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,554 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,552 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,540 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,526 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,510 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,488 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,473 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,455 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,439 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,425 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,415 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,410 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,399 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,388 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,380 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,371 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,357 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,350 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,332 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,310 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,276 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,241 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,214 subscribers15 September 2026 — 13,202 subscribers17 September 2026 — 13,196 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,183 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -428. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,119–13,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:2113,183-13
17 Sept 2026, 03:0013,196-6
15 Sept 2026, 01:1713,202-12
13 Sept 2026, 09:1513,214-27
11 Sept 2026, 11:4113,241-35
8 Sept 2026, 15:3913,276-34
5 Sept 2026, 06:5813,310-22
3 Sept 2026, 08:5813,332-18
2 Sept 2026, 03:2513,350-7
1 Sept 2026, 06:4713,357-14
31 Aug 2026, 09:3513,371-9
30 Aug 2026, 08:0613,380-8
29 Aug 2026, 06:3513,388-11
28 Aug 2026, 08:5513,399-11
27 Aug 2026, 09:1613,410-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:3313,415-10
25 Aug 2026, 14:2813,425-14
24 Aug 2026, 17:1813,439-16
23 Aug 2026, 03:2313,455-18
21 Aug 2026, 15:1813,473first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 13,183 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held32 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total17,950
Reactions total1,411
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,253 reactions across 31 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,11326.2%
custom 523574768711396135996822.8%
😭44010.3%
😁4199.85%
💯3698.68%
💘2014.73%
❤‍🔥1784.19%
😨1553.64%
🤪1132.66%
🤣1082.54%
💊1052.47%
😇451.06%
🔥190.447%
🥰90.212%
🤝60.141%
😢30.071%
😱20.047%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 32 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @womanrelationships. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.13%
1 of 32 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,250
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,210
over 31 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJSxXgm11 September 20261 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC439 views71 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

- Какая принцесса самая красивая? - Ты -Почему ты ответил правильно? Как*я сука спрашивала это у тебя до меня?

😁5410😇7

2 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC582 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Какую картину вы бы хотели нарисовать? 🎨 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов 👇

  1. 139%
  2. 215%
  3. 346%
  4. 425%
  5. 526%
  6. 626%
  7. 735%
  8. 811%
  9. 923%

The shares total 246%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6😭5

2 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC568 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Какую из этих картин по номерам вы бы хотели нарисовать? Можно голосовать за несколько вариантов ⬇️На Wildberries ещё больше картин⬇️ Каталог картин по номерам "Магия цифр"

4❤‍🔥3custom 52357476871139613592

2 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC871 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Вас бы насторожило, что у человека есть бывший муж/жена в возрасте до 30 лет? 🤔

  1. Честно, да. Рано поженились - рано развелись - есть какой-то подвох…12%
  2. Если развелись не из-за его ужасного поступка(измена/насилие), то меня бы не напрягло65%
  3. Нет, это такие же отношения, просто оформленные по бумажкам21%
  4. Свой вариант ❤️‍🩹2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 15:26 UTC≈1,180 views154 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сюжетный поворот: он писал другу, но перепутал чаты…😏

😭107🤣29😁10💯62

1 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,250 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJSxXgmPhoto

Почему мужчина будто не слышит тебя?🙉 Почему со временем исчезают страсть, азарт и ощущение «я хочу его прямо сейчас»?🙈 «Идеальная любовница» — бесплатный тренинг для женщин, которые хотят чувствовать себя уверенно в отношениях и в сексе.👄 Без cоветов уровня «просто любите себя». Поговорим о том, что действительно влияет на близость, желание и удовольствие. На тренинге узнаешь: ❤️как говорить с партнёром о желани

custom 523574768711396135943

31 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC≈1,430 views84 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Парень, 25 Подскажите, бывают ли у вас ситуации в отношениях, что происходит какая-то незначительная фигня, которая затем перерастает во что-то значительное? Из мухи в слона. Например, я могу сморозить что-то неподумав, и все, у нас обоих настроение в хлам. Естественно, я сразу извиняюсь. Пытаюсь загладить чем-то вину. Но у обоих все равно 💩, а не настроение Как быть? Вроде бы 2 взрослых, здравомыслящих человека, но

60💘13❤‍🔥11

30 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC≈1,660 views148 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мы?

113❤‍🔥15😇14💘3🔥2🥰1

29 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈1,710 views212 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ахахаха, ну это ведь правда, ну!

😁123😭4530💯5🥰3😢3😇2🔥1

28 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,910 views124 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Лучше познакомиться, чем не познакомиться☝🏻 Первое сообщение/первый подход вживую - нелегко. Появляется страх быть кринжовым, отверженным, не хочется получать ударов по самооценке Но блин… «покринжевать» - пара секунд/минут. И это в худшем случае! ❤️‍🩹В лучшем - может появиться взаимная симпатия, а может даже любовь в будущем. +Гарантированно не будут преследовать мысли в духе «эх, а надо было написать…» Игра стои

90❤‍🔥17💘14🤣3

26 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈2,120 views186 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💪

115😁49❤‍🔥15🤪4💘3

25 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,210 views257 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

У него есть какая-то тактика и он её придерживается 👍

😁156😨5729custom 52357476871139613596🔥5💘4

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @womanrelationships. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

Какую картину вы бы хотели нарисовать? 🎨 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов 👇

  1. 139%
  2. 215%
  3. 346%
  4. 425%
  5. 526%
  6. 626%
  7. 735%
  8. 811%
  9. 923%

The shares total 246%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTCAnonymous Poll486 voters

Вас бы насторожило, что у человека есть бывший муж/жена в возрасте до 30 лет? 🤔

  1. Честно, да. Рано поженились - рано развелись - есть какой-то подвох…12%
  2. Если развелись не из-за его ужасного поступка(измена/насилие), то меня бы не напрягло65%
  3. Нет, это такие же отношения, просто оформленные по бумажкам21%
  4. Свой вариант ❤️‍🩹2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTCAnonymous Poll938 voters

Девушки, как вам комфортнее добираться до парней на первом свидании? 👀

  1. В идеале, чтобы он заехал11%
  2. Приятно, если мне вызовут такси19%
  3. Мне без разницы32%
  4. Только своим ходом!24%
  5. Я парень 🫥14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTCAnonymous Poll824 voters

«Если твоё, то само к тебе вернется» - Согласны? А то так часто говорят тем, кто больно расстался 👍

  1. Да, но не всегда сразу42%
  2. Нет, если от тебя отказались - это не твоё55%
  3. Свой вариант ❤️‍🩹4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTCAnonymous Poll1,050 voters approx.

«Погулять в парке» на 1 свидание - зашквар предложение? 🥱

  1. Да, скучно, «нищево»4%
  2. Смотря как, можно это норм организовать53%
  3. Нет, это зашквар только для всяких психологинь из инсты56%
  4. Свой вариант ❤️‍🩹2%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

date ideas|психология отношений
@dateideasspp · 46,293
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
никому не рассказывай
@usveex · 50,389
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
взрослая жизнь
@vzroslyaa · 122,240
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
бабские записки ✨
@girl_notess · 26,380
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 September 2026
Бывшие 🎭
@buvchiy · 40,020
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
Девичник 💍
@girl_humor · 54,349
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
Баба Зоя
@babazoyka · 87,450
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Блокнот психолога | Саморазвитие
@blocknot_psyh · 31,227
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
Нежная мотивация
@neznaymot · 36,829
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“woMan | про отношения” (@womanrelationships), 13,183 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/womanrelationships.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.