Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Вася и финансы

@vasya_lfp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

12,246subscribers

-96 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001397808204
TypeChannel
Username@vasya_lfp
DescriptionПоказываю как жить лучше за те же деньги, стабильно расти в доходе и создать капитал 1000+ разобранных бюджетов Сэкономил/заработал клиентам 20 млн+ руб По вопросам сотрудничества и рекламы: @MarinaKondratyeva #RIYND
CreatedBetween 1 October 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vasya_lfp

Growth

12,24612,34212,2946 August 2026 — 12,342 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,339 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,319 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,316 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,305 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,292 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,284 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,277 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,265 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,246 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,232–12,356 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:4312,246-19
13 Aug 2026, 12:0612,265-12
12 Aug 2026, 14:3312,277-7
11 Aug 2026, 17:4212,284-8
10 Aug 2026, 14:5312,292-13
9 Aug 2026, 11:5112,305-11
8 Aug 2026, 10:1412,316-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:0012,319-20
6 Aug 2026, 10:2112,339-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:3212,342first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 12,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held29 (24 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total38,190
Reactions total2,004
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
756
Videos
123
Links
478

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
41s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,869 reactions across 26 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55629.7%
🔥51327.4%
👍1598.51%
😱1397.44%
😁854.55%
🤣774.12%
💯673.58%
💔512.73%
😢321.71%
🤬271.44%
😎261.39%
❤‍🔥241.28%
🙈221.18%
👏160.856%
😴100.535%
🤝100.535%
🤯100.535%
👀90.482%
😭90.482%
👌80.428%
4 further kinds191.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,004reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 29 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vasya_lfp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC600 views103 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

Я считаю, что к кризису нужно готовиться всегда (по следам вчерашнего поста и переписки в комментариях к нему) И дело вообще не в курсе доллара, ценах на нефть, ключевой ставке и тд. Если посмотреть не на экономику целиком, а на жизнь одного конкретного человека, возникает довольно неприятная математика: Вероятность того, что не произойдёт вообще ничего, способного сильно ударить по вашим финансам, практически нул

52🔥28👍18💯3🤔2

14 Aug 2026, 06:55 UTC742 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Кто из Санкт-Петербурга? Будем делать бизнес-завтрак? Возможно, я назад полечу через СПБ. И конечно возникла идея: а почему-бы не задержаться на +1 день и не провести бизнес-завтрак также, как в Москве? Варианты проведения: 22 авг - утро 23 авг - утро 24 авг - вечер Отпишитесь в комментариях кто хочет присоединиться и когда удобнее?

🔥198👍5❤‍🔥3😢1

13 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC853 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026

А вы готовы к кризису, если он начнется завтра? Я не знаю, будет ли в ближайшее время кризис. И, думаю, никто этого не знает. Но цифры как минимум заставляют задуматься: ▪️Ключевая ставка - 14%, а прогноз по инфляции повысили до 6–7% ▪️Максимальная ставка по вкладам крупнейших банков в июле была около 12,8%. ▪️Средняя ставка по ипотеке 16-17%. А реальная, по моим ощущениям 20-25% При этом 35% россиян говорят, чт

26😐8💯7😱4👍2

12 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC953 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

❗️Друзья, если вам написали от имени якобы моего канала - это мошенники, не ведитесь ❗️ Как-то они активность проявляют последнее время. Конечно я понимаю, что это в тч признак популярности, но все равно опасаюсь за подписчиков 🙁 БУДЬТЕ ВНИМАТЕЛЬНЫ!!!

🔥20🤝107😢2👍1😱1

12 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC952 views68 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026

Как мы воруем деньги сами у себя Многие финансовые проблемы возникают не из-за бедности. А из-за того, что мы каждый день незаметно крадём у своего будущего Неосознанно. Без злого умысла. Просто потихоньку делаем, и это становится привычкой 📌 Тратим 90% денег «по ощущениям», даже не попытавшись прикинуть план Тратим на доставку еды, кафешечки, случайные обучающие курсы, одежду, маркетплейсы, подарки и тп При это

55🔥7👍4💯2

11 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,010 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Что дает один час работы с финансами в месяц? Недавно с командой собирали анкеты учеников прошлых потоков обучения. Очень круто наблюдать, как люди приходят с абсолютно разными ситуациями, а получают понятные и оцифрованные результаты Причем, изменения видны не только в цифрах, но и в том, как люди начинают себя чувствовать. Собрал для вас небольшой срез того, что происходит у ребят после обучения👇 📊 ПО ЦИФРАМ: «

🔥179👍7👏1

10 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC≈1,060 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

«Хочешь навести порядок в финансах? Просто удали Wildberries» 🛍 ⠀ ⠀ ☝🏻 Именно такой совет я недавно встретил на просторах интернета Кстати, в анкетах от вас я тоже иногда получаю такие ответы на вопрос: Что вы уже пробовали делать, чтобы навести порядок в финансах? Звучит как идеальный план: нет приложения — нет соблазна заказать третий крем для лица, пятый чехол на айфон и вон ту очень нужную интерьерную свечу в д

👍2413🤔3💯2🔥2❤‍🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈1,260 views74 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Традиционный воскресный мем 🙂 Когда мама - финансово грамотная )

🤣56😁95👍4

8 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,400 views200 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Вася, пишите про финансы и не лезьте в личную жизнь! (с) Иногда на моих вебинарах происходит интересная штука. Когда контентная часть заканчивается, я выключаю запись и... В этот момент у нас с участниками всегда начинаются самые откровенные и живые разговоры Именно там я иногда делюсь историями из своего прошлого. И, периодически, после таких эфиров я получаю обратную связь в личку Посыл обычно один: «Вася, вы кл

🔥175👍129👌21❤‍🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈1,320 views75 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Не внесла в доходы 3 500 евро... 😱 Делюсь классным инсайтом из чата нашего текущего потока обучения. Участница из Европы скинула свои первые результаты после того, как села и впервые за долгое время свела траты и доходы с начала года Скрин прикрепил выше 👆 Оказалось, что она: ➖ не учла налоговый вычет на целых 3500 евро ➖ походы в рестораны оказались на такой страшной статьей расходов ➖ а вот магазин у дома расстр

🔥4816👍7💯4

7 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,290 views87 reactionsread 15 August 2026

А что, если прямо сейчас вы совершаете ту же финансовую ошибку, которую совершали люди 300 лет назад? В 17 веке жадность государства заставила людей жить в темноте... Англия, 1696 год, вводится налог на окна. Логика была проста: если у тебя большой дом и много окон, ты богат — значит, плати больше Но люди нашли «гениальный» выход: Они начали массово закладывать окна кирпичами 🧱 Налоги снизились, но целые города по

53🔥16💯9👍8👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @vasya_lfp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@vasya_lfp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 349,095 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вася и финансы” (@vasya_lfp), 12,246 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vasya_lfp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.