♓︎ Рыбы, 29 сентября Жизнь вращается вокруг вашего влюблённого личика. Продолжайте. Наилучшее сочетание: Дева Наихудшее сочетание: Близнецы

Channel
astro love | любовный гороскоп
@astroolove
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,249subscribers
-1,919 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001759293876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astroolove |
| Description | Реклама: @astromanage Канал зарегистрирован в официальном перечне Роскомнадзора: https://clck.ru/3GEux5 |
| Created | 28 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astroolove |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 60,249 | -322 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 60,571 | -93 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 60,664 | -82 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 60,746 | -54 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 60,800 | -71 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 60,871 | -78 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 60,949 | -77 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 61,026 | -98 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:29 | 61,124 | -27 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 61,151 | -40 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 61,191 | -99 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 61,290 | -30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 61,320 | -40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 61,360 | -40 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 61,400 | -50 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 61,450 | -52 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 61,502 | -43 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 61,545 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 61,587 | -39 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 61,626 | first reading |
Engagement
526 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.0%
- avg views ÷ 60,249 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,610
- 283 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 283
- of 526 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 283 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 526 (4 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,871,600 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 04:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,340
- Videos
- ≈4
- Links
- ≈4,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 33
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 26
- of 526 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astroolove. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 526 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 0.76%
- 4 of 526 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 4
- posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 6,020
- over 4 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 6,690
- over 522 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFG6KvEV | 1 | 23 September 2026 | 23 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHQ9M3F | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJhiNaD | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFK4ewUM | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 526 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
♒︎ Водолей, 29 сентября Планета крутится, заёбы по отношениям мутятся, всё как обычно. Наилучшее сочетание: Овен Наихудшее сочетание: Скорпион
♑︎ Козерог, 29 сентября Даже у ваших лучших друзей появился разум не наступать в одно говно дважды. А вы когда поймёте? Наилучшее сочетание: Близнецы Наихудшее сочетание: Дева
♐︎ Стрелец, 29 сентября Самое время смотреть сопливые драмы и тренировать слёзные железы. Наилучшее сочетание: Рак Наихудшее сочетание: Овен
♏︎ Скорпион, 29 сентября Роскомнадзор заблокирует вам доступ в токсичные отношения. Ищите здоровые. Наилучшее сочетание: Лев Наихудшее сочетание: Водолей
♎︎ Весы, 29 сентября Вся ваша грусть уйдёт как только вы поцелуете любимого человека. Где бы его найти. Наилучшее сочетание: Телец Наихудшее сочетание: Лев
♍︎ Дева, 29 сентября Звёзды выдадут вам купон на то, чтобы вы послали всех к чёрту авансом. Наилучшее сочетание: Рыбы Наихудшее сочетание: Козерог
♌︎ Лев, 29 сентября Чрезвычайно удивительный день без мыслей о бывших. Обалдеть. Наилучшее сочетание: Скорпион Наихудшее сочетание: Весы
♋︎ Рак, 29 сентября Вы достойны цветов и бриллиантов, а не ежедневного игнора. Наилучшее сочетание: Стрелец Наихудшее сочетание: Телец
♊︎ Близнецы, 29 сентября Сонник говорит, что если снится бывший, то это к тому, чтобы вы снова послали его нахуй. Наилучшее сочетание: Козерог Наихудшее сочетание: Рыбы
♉︎ Телец, 29 сентября В этих отношениях пора писать с вас икону как с Великомученника. Наилучшее сочетание: Весы Наихудшее сочетание: Рак
♈︎ Овен, 29 сентября Снова эта любовь пытается залезть вам в душу. Не надо, у вас работа. Наилучшее сочетание: Водолей Наихудшее сочетание: Стрелец
Showing the 12 most recent of 526 posts we hold for @astroolove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@astrogiks · 307,464#1
@astro_juliaa · 212,063#2
@tarogks · 88,597#3
@goro_kirill · 171,579#4
@astronotesx · 23,891#5
@iaccept · 27,750#6
@tg_horoscope · 110,953#7
@tyt_znaki · 99,847#8
@ELFORDSKOP · 11,622#9
@sms_kaa · 37,820#10
@etoznakmag · 636,095#11
@test_dot · 519,044#12
@kosti · 560,192#13
@astrowox · 16,556#14
@rhymestg · 1,415,446#15
@official_romanceclub · 735,741#16
@valentinablor · 124,060#17
@femalememes · 407,543#18
@leoday · 5,524,566#19
@msk_live · 1,804,158#20
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339#21
@TgEmojis · 1,677,995#22
@exilemusic13 · 1,445,701#23
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,401#24
@egorkreed · 743,409#25
@maslennikovliga · 2,134,958#26
@br1anm7ps · 1,090,016#27
@paradeevich · 1,059,396#28
@petrovtel · 525,264#29
@DKNASASAL · 390,717#30
@okbnews · 191,483#31
@koreshzy · 826,459#32
@strochki_tg · 54,441#33
@moscowach · 4,076,789#34
@SHTOLLNEWS · 519,842#35
@elenaraytman · 846,365#36
@anyaischukkkk · 601,146#37
@oieiei · 685,689#38
@officialannaperesild · 183,249#39
@stikery4 · 1,083,175#40
@mazellovvv · 421,504#41
@kishlak_family · 265,329#42
@danila_gorilla · 643,829#43
@milashkina_nekrasova · 249,981#44
@everydayrain · 237,282#45
@theohdaily · 177,106#46
@budaog · 359,247#47
@thegerberslive · 640,156#48
@gensyka · 270,231#49
@milanapetrovaqueen · 201,434#50
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iaccept · 27,750
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@astro_juliaa · 212,063
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 August 2026
@astrost1ftka · 50,440
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 24 August 2026
@tarogks · 88,597
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
@tg_horoscope · 110,953
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
@astrogiks · 307,464
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 August 2026
@g_skorpion · 21,081
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 24 September 2026
@g_riba · 22,242
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
@goro_kirill · 171,579
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
@g_aries · 20,641
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 26 September 2026
@g_vodolei · 21,227
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 24 September 2026
@g_vesi · 21,463
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
@g_virgo · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
@g_rakk · 22,772
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 19 September 2026
@g_levv · 23,620
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 September 2026
@g_kozerog · 21,250
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 September 2026
@g_bliznec · 23,006
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 19 September 2026
@astro_my · 35,270
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
@g_telec · 21,269
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 24 September 2026
@magiaezoterica · 56,835
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 23 August 2026
@tyt_znaki · 99,847
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 August 2026
@sms_kaa · 37,820
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
@nudaznaki · 130,547
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 August 2026
@astrologyyours · 42,952
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 42 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“astro love | любовный гороскоп” (@astroolove), 60,249 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astroolove.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.