Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бывшие 🎭

Channel

Бывшие 🎭

@buvchiy

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,628subscribers

-1,307 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001985364575
TypeChannel
Username@buvchiy
DescriptionОбсуждаем отношения и смеемся над бывшими 😎 Сотрудничество: @etozhes Реклама и условия размещения: https://t.me/moscow_brand Предложка: @buvchiypred_bot РКН: https://clck.ru/3G7zEX
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/buvchiy

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 17 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@buvchiy/9481 · this entry5 Sept 2026, 17:19 UTC@trashovynews/329395 Sept 2026, 18:40 UTC1.0081 minutes
@trashovynews/330039 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC@buvchiy/9508 · this entry10 Sept 2026, 11:32 UTC1.0023 hours
@trashovynews/3316017 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC@buvchiy/9539 · this entry18 Sept 2026, 07:46 UTC1.0011 hours
@trashovynews/3317418 Sept 2026, 20:39 UTC@buvchiy/9570 · this entry24 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC1.006 days
@trashovynews/334315 Oct 2026, 10:39 UTC@buvchiy/9618 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 05:49 UTC1.0043 hours
@trashovynews/334748 Oct 2026, 08:40 UTC@buvchiy/9630 · this entry8 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC1.009.2 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@trashovynews11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0033 hours@trashovynews (9–2)
@girl_notess7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@girl_notess (4–3)
@girl_and_work7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–2)
@girl_humor7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@girl_humor (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 62 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 17 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @topor. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 17 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

39,62840,93540,281.57 August 20269 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net -1,307. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,432–41,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:5539,628-30
8 Nov 2026, 13:5739,658-27
7 Nov 2026, 05:2639,685-10
6 Nov 2026, 06:4639,695-26
5 Nov 2026, 07:3839,721-19
4 Nov 2026, 06:5539,740-23
3 Nov 2026, 08:3439,763-17
2 Nov 2026, 08:3539,780-13
1 Nov 2026, 10:0939,793-24
31 Oct 2026, 13:0839,817-23
30 Oct 2026, 13:2739,840-22
29 Oct 2026, 13:2839,862+1
28 Oct 2026, 10:4539,861-19
27 Oct 2026, 10:3639,880+18
26 Oct 2026, 12:0439,862-29
25 Oct 2026, 09:4939,891-21
24 Oct 2026, 10:4139,912-15
23 Oct 2026, 09:3639,927-15
22 Oct 2026, 06:1539,942-10
21 Oct 2026, 02:4139,952first reading

Engagement

366 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 39,628 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,290
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
104
of 366 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 103 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held366 (2 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total549,660
Reactions total25,503
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,110
Videos
≈1,560
Links
≈2,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
29m 37s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

90,550 reactions across 365 posts, in 66 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣19,01821.0%
😁17,17919.0%
❤15,31616.9%
🤡12,02713.3%
✍3,2403.58%
💯2,5552.82%
🥰2,5112.77%
❤‍🔥2,0842.30%
💊1,4961.65%
👍1,3781.52%
🔥1,2131.34%
👀1,0901.20%
☃1,0391.15%
😭9741.08%
🗿9241.02%
😐7570.836%
💘7330.809%
👏6450.712%
🤬6130.677%
🌚6080.671%
46 further kinds5,1505.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 365 of the 366 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90,550 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 366 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 366 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @buvchiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 366 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.546%
2 of 366 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,660
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
5,420
over 364 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VSb5xx319L120 August 202620 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqVL5hkuaxWhurY9gyC3ciXw2wPACwoUouBmHK110 November 202610 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 366 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 104 posts held from the last 30 days (0.962%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC≈1,800 views133 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Окак

🤡99😁20💊6✍5🥰2💯1

10 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC≈2,400 views265 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

😂😂😂

🤣214😁26❤16🥰4😢3😱2

10 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,660 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJqVL5hkuaxWhurY9gyC3ciXw2wPACwoUouBmHKPhoto

Хватит гадать на кофейной гуще, почему он пропал после свидания и почему вас вечно тянет не к тем 🤡 Есть вариант продуктивнее: прогнать себя через бот Код притяжения. Штука за минуту считает ваш тип мужчины по дате рождения, выдаст жестко правдивый психологический портрет и даже сгенерирует через нейросеть образ вашего судьбоносного мужчины. Теперь уж точно станет понятно, на каких драмах и паттернах держится лична…

🤡9❤1

10 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,130 views183 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Вопросы ?

❤85😁67🤡25💯4🤷‍♂1🥰1

10 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC≈3,370 views208 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Ты матом кроешь профессора 😂

🥰114🤡54😁23✍10❤6🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈3,870 views136 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Согласились бы ? 😂😂😂

👏74😐33😁13🤣11❤‍🔥3❤2

9 Nov 2026, 15:32 UTC≈4,080 views197 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Сыночка корзиночка вышел на новый уровень

🤡143🤣43❤6👀4🥰1

9 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC≈4,130 views218 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Кто тут лишний ? 😂

🤡160🤣47😢5👀3❤2🤝1

9 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈4,030 viewsread 11 November 2026

Тут ты сможешь написать «ОН КОНЧЕНЫЙ МУДАК» и получить в ответ сто тысяч ❤️ и «ДА ДА ДА» https://t.me/+dgju8mDhTuEwNGQ6

9 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈4,110 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

АХАХАХХХААХХ, здесь стебут тупых мужиков так, что хочется переслать каждой подруге 🤣 На канале CONSTANT’S | Территория Императриц жестко разбирают таких особей мужского пола 🚩🚩🚩 Подпишись, если хочешь вовремя распознавать таких «мужчин»: https://t.me/+dgju8mDhTuEwNGQ6

❤12

9 Nov 2026, 08:55 UTC≈4,330 views310 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

😅😅😅

😁268🤡18❤11👻6🥴4🥰3

8 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC≈4,730 views375 reactionsread 11 November 2026

девочка: «мой типаж - это голубоглазые блондины» женщина: «кто больше всего для меня делает, тот и мой типаж»

❤248🥰56😁37🔥18👍9❤‍🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 366 posts we hold for @buvchiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @buvchiy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Девичник 💍
@girl_humor · 52,582
#1
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 399,175
#2
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 742,791
#3
date ideas|психология отношений
@dateideasspp · 45,096
#4
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,527,518
#5
KOSTI
@kosti · 550,990
#6
ЮРА С ПЬЮРА
@uraspura · 15,348
#7
Напоминание
@napomynanie · 70,156
#8
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 109,553
#9
не вешай носик котёночек
@meow_meow_cute · 113,019
#10
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,542,565
#11
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 631,287
#12
Записки какого-то мужика
@zapiski_man3 · 31,230
#13
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,622,185
#14
Твиттерок
@twitter_ok · 65,999
#15
в тренде у девочек
@females · 493,649
#16
Любимый ВПШ 😮‍💨
@lyubimyivpsh · 142,012
#17
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,799,940
#18
бабские записки ✨
@girl_notess · 25,562
#19
мы вам перезвоним
@ca11_you · 138,656
#20
Мог бы догадаться
@mogbydog · 1,106
#21
Бегущий по рынку
@ryanrun · 1,291,926
#22
woMan | про отношения
@womanrelationships · 12,755
#23
мы оцениваем собак
@dogs_rate · 28,969
#24
Bratz memes
@bratz_memes · 21,869
#25
ДевАчки🍷| Женский юмор
@girl_humorr · 18,211
#26
БОРОДАТАЯ ПОДРУГА
@borodapodruga · 15,440
#27
Беспощадный ритейл
@b_retail · 137,499
#28
ТОПОР - Горячие новости
@topor · 1,291,254
#29
Сцены Василия
@ohhgodnoo · 8,039
#30
взрослая жизнь
@vzroslyaa · 120,847
#31
Евдокия Эмоциональная
@Evdokia_Emotional · 53,001
#32
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 418,557
#33
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,391,616
#34
Клиент всегда прав
@klientvsprav · 1,023,943
#35
Mash
@mash · 3,140,033
#36
4ch
@why4ch · 1,021,671
#37
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,879,362
#38
Двач
@dvachannel · 969,331
#39
КК
@petrovtel · 541,590
#40
ок, согласовано
@notypicmarketing · 707,978
#41
Тупые депрессивные мемы
@tdmem · 24,120
#42
Привет, я Элис
@Privet_ya_Elis · 29,271
#43
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,594
#44
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,975,436
#45
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,694,226
#46
лети с приветом!
@letisprivetom · 6,137
#47
твиттач
@twitt_chan · 5,659
#48
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 197,670
#49
Свидание вслепую
@SDNVS · 2,494
#50
ох
@theohdaily · 171,623
#51
ВАЛЕНТИНА БЛОГ
@valentinablor · 116,742
#52
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,557,057
#53
Я другое заказывал
@russian_ecom · 81,456
#54
о чём говорят коллеги
@kollegi · 186,268
#55
Передали коллегам
@collegi · 134,238
#56
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,101,908
#57
Игорь, начинайте работу
@oplata_skoro_budet · 645,495
#58
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · 3,880,315
#59
Стикеры | Эмодзи
@stikery4 · 1,072,837
#60
Надписи на стенах
@stenabazovaya · 15,751
#61
шерстяные проказники • коты
@koshkii_kotiki · 333,753
#62
ЖИЗА | КОМИКСЫ
@jizajz · 113,139
#63
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,117,922
#64
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 842,381
#65
Первый Московский
@mosguru · 3,404,643
#66
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 730,054
#67
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,265,878
#68
гороскоп и кирилл
@goro_kirill · 167,721
#69
1
@strochki_tg · 11
#70
Ору, мисс!
@miss_oru · 63,069
#71
никому не рассказывай
@usveex · 49,415
#72

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тиндер Разведчица
@TinderSOS · 32,913
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
date ideas|психология отношений
@dateideasspp · 45,096
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
Евдокия Эмоциональная
@Evdokia_Emotional · 53,001
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
Девичник 💍
@girl_humor · 52,582
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
бабские записки ✨
@girl_notess · 25,562
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 September 2026
Записки какого-то мужика
@zapiski_man3 · 31,230
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
FEMALE MEMES
@femalememes · 399,175
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 August 2026
Напоминание
@napomynanie · 70,156
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
в тренде у девочек
@females · 493,649
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
мы оцениваем собак
@dogs_rate · 28,969
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Твиттерок
@twitter_ok · 65,999
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Не перепутай!
@nepereputai · 86,919
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 109,553
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Bratz memes
@bratz_memes · 21,869
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
Горд🏴‍☠️
@oskolkiblok · 57,898
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
ЖИЗА | КОМИКСЫ
@jizajz · 113,139
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 August 2026
Бывший
@exboyfriend · 46,754
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
взрослая жизнь
@vzroslyaa · 120,847
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026
Тупые депрессивные мемы
@tdmem · 24,120
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 September 2026
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 742,791
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
Привет, я Элис
@Privet_ya_Elis · 29,271
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Баба Зоя
@babazoyka · 85,288
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Ритейл заказывали?
@retailife · 92,842
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
никому не рассказывай
@usveex · 49,415
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бывшие 🎭” (@buvchiy), 39,628 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/buvchiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.