9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,767–17,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:42
17,823
+44
14 Aug 2026, 02:38
17,779
-18
12 Aug 2026, 20:44
17,797
-12
11 Aug 2026, 22:16
17,809
-11
10 Aug 2026, 20:42
17,820
-13
9 Aug 2026, 20:57
17,833
-3
8 Aug 2026, 20:16
17,836
-16
7 Aug 2026, 20:58
17,852
-6
7 Aug 2026, 12:46
17,858
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.22%
avg views ÷ 17,823 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
19 (22 May 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
5,148
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
85 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
63.5%
🔥
21
24.7%
👍
10
11.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎯🎯🎯Airdrop Alert 🎯🎯🎯
Join Safevano Waitlist when you see this post.
It cost Zero Dollar to position for this opportunity
safevano.com/ref/ABYFLUHK
$Safevano Wallet is the first premium self- custody wallet built on Robinhood Chain.
It offers a secure, user-friendly Web3 experience for both beginners and advanced users, featuring:
• AI-powered assistance
• RWA (real-world asset) integration
• DeFi access
• Fa…
Hey Guys, Consider adding some GAYU Token Here.
Chart is looking Bullish and I have bought some hoping we go to the moon 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
https://dexscreener.com/solana/EwGHDVwQfH4vhPuhEZLvvoFzQco17vas2XNmWAi9L79W
If you are still up, join this wait-list on Robinhood chain immediately.
Robinscribeapp is live.
registration: robinscribeapp.xyz/early-access
Code: RSC-T4GD4T
Tangem is a true self-custody wallet that puts you in complete control of your digital assets. Unlike exchanges, where a third party holds your funds, Tangem gives you ownership through self-custody—because if you don't control the keys, you don't truly control your crypto.
💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳
Don't Skip this Update no matter what
💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳💳
•Win $10 USDC every day for 10 days
•150 winners total to be selected
Camp…
My entry for @Durov Digital Freedom Contest.
If you want to participate and have a share of the $200,000 allocated for the @telegram Digital Freedom video contest
Follow the guide below
•Create a video explaining digital freedom
•Sample or take footage from @durov's speech on Digital freedom. Link 👇 👇
tinyurl.com/49mx64he
•Publish your content on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat or X
•Requirem…
How to Position for ANSEM Airdrop
A Simple Guide on how to position for @blknoiz06 Community Drop.
- Register on Bullpen: bullpen.fi/@C4B
• Click on wallet
• Click 👉 ≡ at the top left corner
• Click on ANSEM on the list
• Link your x account
• import the wallet where you held ANSEM
- Tweet about $ANSEM & you can get lucky
This is way better than eating leaf.
You can also publish great content to get his attention…
NEX Went Live on Pancakeswap at 1.2b FDV.
🔸 Network: BNB Smart Chain (BSC)
Contract Address: 0x57B39F81547cC9F2E599472Aab9131Bba74A5166
💳💳 Important Update 💳💳
To ensure asset security and long-term sustainable ecosystem development, NEX inside the Novaex AI account is initially set to a locked state.
Users are required to follow the activation process below to unlock ecosystem utility:
1️⃣ Purchase NEX on…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Crypto4bailoutNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto With Shola @cryptowithshola · 108,120 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
BOOKIES NIGHTMARE 😱 @Ekiti1 · 199,976 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Mr Banks Free Channel @MrBanksFreeChannel · 442,590 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
XM Trading Academy @ahmedfreesignals · 302,026 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto4bailout Announcement/Ape&Pajeet” (@Crypto4bailoutNews), 17,823 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto4bailoutNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.