4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,077–7,112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:24
7,108
+27
9 Aug 2026, 10:51
7,081
-5
6 Aug 2026, 11:00
7,086
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:53
7,086
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.9%
avg views ÷ 7,108 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
52 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
77,324
Reactions total
1,523
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 45s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,523 reactions across 52 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
475
31.2%
👍
419
27.5%
😁
186
12.2%
🔥
146
9.59%
❤🔥
63
4.14%
💯
63
4.14%
🤡
48
3.15%
👎
23
1.51%
💩
21
1.38%
🏆
19
1.25%
🤬
19
1.25%
🤣
12
0.788%
🤔
9
0.591%
🤯
7
0.46%
👏
4
0.263%
🤮
4
0.263%
🤝
3
0.197%
🙏
2
0.131%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,523reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие друзья❤️
Влад проходит самый серьезный бой в своей жизни, лейкоз навсегда разделил судьбу маленького спортсмена на «до» и «после» . Болезнь отступила, ремиссия достигнута, побочный эффект химиотерапии прошелся катком по основным функциям организма , впереди большой путь реабилитации, которая уже дала серьезный результат, за прошедшие пол года мальчик от невозможности поднять ногу и костылей восстановился…
🧣 Разыгрываем стильный шарфик со всеми автографами футболистов самарской команды!
🎁 Для участия в розыгрыше нужно всего лишь подписаться:
👉 «Форвард | Толмачёв»;
👉 «Привет со Дна»;
👉 «ArtKS | Крылья Советов».
✔️ и нажать кнопку «ХОЧУ ШАРФ!»
Итоги – 24.08.2026
❗️ Доставка победителю осуществляется только по России.
Первый домашний матч традиционно вызвал большой интерес к команде — и после матча игроки поделились мнениями с представителями СМИ и медиасферы:
Сергей Песьяков: через неделю у нас будет возможность зайти в раздевалку с другим настроением
Максим Витюгов: мы создали критически мало для себя моментов
Сергей Бабкин: после гола соперник сел, а мы — команда контратакующая
Кирилл Печенин: нам не по 11 лет, чтобы сносил…
После поражений мы не привыкли рассчитывать на общительность игроков, но вчера, как вы можете заметить по сегодняшним публикациям в канале, в миксте общалось полсостава. Ещё и интервью Чинеду Джеффри вышло: https://metaratings.ru/news/igrok-krylev-chinedu-nemnogo-znayu-russkii-i-kazakhskii-so-vzaimoponimaniem-problem-net-642048/
Благодарю игроков за отзывчивость и медиаблок клуба во главе с новым директором по комму…
😀Шитов – о поражении от «Балтики»
– Продолжается тенденция с прошлого сезона, когда «Крыльям» было легче играть с московскими командами?
– Да в целом бывают такие неудачные матчи. Мы сделаем выводы, с любым соперником мы должны побеждать, забирать очки.
– Сильно смутил быстрый гол?
– Не знаю, как игроков на поле, но для нас стало неожиданностью. Но мы готовились к тому, что они создают очень много моментов с ауто…
🛡Печенин: нам не по 11 лет, чтобы сносило голову от похвалы экспертов
– Больше двух месяцев не играли дома. Последняя игра была при сумасшедшей поддержке с «Акроном», пришло 26 тысяч зрителей. Ждали скорее вернуться, но сегодня не получилось порадовать болельщиков.
– Какая была установка в обороне с «Балтикой» и её длинными передачами, борьбой?
– Всё очевидно и просто – выиграть борьбу и забрать подбор.
– «Крылья…
😀Бабкин: «После гола соперник сел, а мы команда контратакующая»
– Нужно было взламывать, может не хватило опыта взломать их оборону, создать достаточное количество моментов.
– Продолжается тенденция, что «Крыльям» легче играть против более открытых московских команд?
– Возможно, но нужно и с такими соперниками играть. Наверное, это и опыт.
Уверен, будем тренировать, чтобы не было таких матчей, где мы на мяче, вро…
😀Витюгов: «Мы создали критически мало для себя моментов»
«В этом есть заслуга «Балтики», они играли очень компактно и организованно, это их сильнейшее качество.
В атаке «Балтика» не создавала что-то гениальное, играла достаточно просто и примитивно длинными передачами. Мы были к этому готовы, нам говорили про ауты, борьбу, что подбивают мяч. Так первый гол и пропустили.
Когда пропускаешь на второй минуте, очень тя…
Сергей Песьяков: «Мы сами куём свою судьбу. Через неделю у нас будет возможность зайти в раздевалку с другим настроением»
После поражения от «Балтики» со счётом 0:2 вратарь «Крыльев Советов» Сергей Песьяков подвёл итоги матча, рассказал о слабых первых таймах команды, оценил игру соперника и поделился настроем команды после поражения.
— Сергей, здравствуйте! Краткий анализ игры. Что сегодня не получилось? Вроде бы …
🔥Талалаев снова врубил режим катка на прессухе! В потрясающей форме!
Я принял эстафету у Петра Коптева и попал под лютого Андрея Викторовича. Хотел узнать, как Балтике удалось впервые за 11 официальных матчей не пропустить, но…
— Это вы можете учитывать прошлый сезон как хотите. Мы сыграли в этом сезоне три матча. Вы очень странный человек. Прошлый сезон считаете, а играх на сборах не входят. Интересный подход у ва…
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @privetsodna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@privetsodna edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Первый трофей в истории или очередной сезон в РПЛ?
Выиграть Кубок, но вылететь в ФНЛ39%
Остаться в РПЛ, но снова не выиграть Кубок61%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 162,806 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЧП САМАРА @chp_samara · 250,603 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
FONBET @fonbet_official · 252,108 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Альфа-Банк Российская Премьер-Лига @premierliga · 191,201 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
Фабрика Футбола @mborzykin · 117,376 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
Инсайды от Карпа || Иван Карпов @karpinside · 142,226 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 13 August 2026
РФС | Сборная России по футболу @teamrussia · 142,467 Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
ФК «Крылья Советов» в сезоне 2022/2023(ru.wikipedia.org) “…-1941837/|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/privetsodna/1688|title="Крылья" заработали на перепродаже семи чертановских…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Привет со Дна 🇸🇱 Крылья Советов Самара” (@privetsodna), 7,108 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privetsodna.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
