Channel

TG-频道精选

@zh_secretary

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112,581subscribers

-571 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001147972019
Type	Channel
Username	@zh_secretary
Description	TG-频道精选，投稿商务合作等事项： @badukeji02
Created	Between 1 May 2017 and 30 June 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	12 August 2026
Measurements held	7
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/zh_secretary

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -571. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112,495–113,238 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:02	112,581	-295
11 Aug 2026, 03:11	112,876	-71
10 Aug 2026, 00:58	112,947	-90
8 Aug 2026, 21:44	113,037	-69
7 Aug 2026, 20:17	113,106	-46
6 Aug 2026, 21:15	113,152	no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:09	113,152	first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 5.56%; avg views ÷ 112,581 subscribers
Avg views / post: 6,260; 10 posts measured
Reaction rate: —; this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window: 10; of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held	22 (23 June 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total	62,571
Reactions total	—
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos: ≈1
Links: ≈2,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 727,417 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

某咕咕的机场 & VPN 测评站
@AAAMouGuGuVPN2026 · 6,5321 post 中转频道，防失联！
@acgr18 · 7111 post 秘密小频道(树洞）
@chxpd · 151,4331 post 奇葩故事会（癫佬频道）
@fa_dian · 44,6021 post 黑丝白丝
@heisibaisi_HD · 1,1671 post IPTV直播源总部
@iptvorganization · 20,3911 post 成人小说禁忌书屋
@JinjiBooks · 2,1841 post 免费节点|梯子|代理|VPN
@mfjdkx · 27,6211 post 免费节点频道
@mfjdpd · 31,2661 post 某咕咕的机场 & VPN 测评站
@MiaoMiaoGuGa · 7,2081 post 8度破解软件频道🔥🔥
@pjrjzy · 125,4361 post 免费VPN破解老司机APP
@pojieljs · 35,4761 post SE-索引公告板
@se_index · 24,0491 post VPN-APP机场大全
@TGvpnjichang · 5,9101 post 百事通-知识问答频道🌾
@zhishidashen · 21,5641 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TG-频道精选” (@zh_secretary), 112,581 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zh_secretary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.