Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

百事通-知识问答频道🌾

@zhishidashen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,744subscribers

+418 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002760930757
TypeChannel
Username@zhishidashen
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhishidashen

Growth

21,32621,74421,5356 August 2026 — 21,326 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,337 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,370 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,409 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,465 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,503 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,564 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,618 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,674 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,744 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +418. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,263–21,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:4221,744+70
14 Aug 2026, 13:3621,674+56
13 Aug 2026, 03:1621,618+54
11 Aug 2026, 23:5321,564+61
10 Aug 2026, 21:2221,503+38
10 Aug 2026, 00:0221,465+56
8 Aug 2026, 22:2421,409+39
8 Aug 2026, 01:2121,370+33
7 Aug 2026, 04:5421,337+11
6 Aug 2026, 21:1621,326first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 21,744 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,310
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.035%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held39 (28 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total168,160
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2052.6%
💩923.7%
😁615.8%
👏25.26%
🤡12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC≈1,340 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

我帮上海一家A公司做设计,设计费也就一万多块钱,我找的前同事B做加工,但他不能开增值票,所以他又找了一个合作的加工厂商C给A开票,设计费也是开在里面,由于都是A给C对公转账,所以B一直拖欠设计费不给我,电话微信都不接了,我想问下万能的网友有什么办法能把血汗钱钱拿回来,下三滥的手段也行,我也想过去起诉,但感觉希望不大,因为我们之间只有一些微信聊天记录。没有签协议,如果观点采纳成功,我会私信红包感谢🙏🏻

2

14 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 15 August 2026

大佬们有没有什么推荐的ai好用点的,我感觉国内的ai都有点不行,国外的有什么可以推荐推荐呀

13 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 15 August 2026

第一次去95的店,小城市,5张,不知道安不安全,有没有老哥讲讲,多给点建议

12 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 15 August 2026

兄弟们有玩连信的吗,连信上面除了🐓以外是不是还真有互相满足的类型的

12 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈2,160 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

飞机上卖片和链接能搞吗?风险大不大?

1

11 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈2,640 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

帮忙找一下这个视频 VIA: 臆

1

11 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈2,500 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_1765688829

1

11 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,370 viewsread 15 August 2026

即将入职新疆那边的国企,听说新疆那边网络和舆论封控比较严,翻墙会受到影响吗,只看看片,逛逛频道,偶尔聊天,不发表言论的话。

11 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 15 August 2026

各位大佬,近视550度是不是真的没救了,也不可能恢复哪怕一点点了,只能做手术吗 还有想跑外卖2年过度,半玩半跑的那种,有没有推荐的电动车,黑骑士83lr怎么样

11 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC≈2,520 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026

我现在做餐饮月薪差不多2万左右但我感觉已经是上限了 现在想去麦肯做区域想再往上升一下局限性可能更高有了解过的吗

11 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈2,500 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026

谷歌邮箱怎么注册啊!哥姐们?一直卡在短信

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @zhishidashen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 939,298 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“百事通-知识问答频道🌾” (@zhishidashen), 21,744 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhishidashen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.