天蚕土豆新书《神通者》明天 8 月 8 日首发5章。 据说是番茄独家连载,不会上架起点、纵横等平台,全程免费阅读。 这波操作可以,土豆书粉还是不少的,可以引流,并且用户还能免费看正版,挺好挺好。

Channel
大雾弥漫
@allmist
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,775subscribers
+125 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001975933307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allmist |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allmist |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 4,775 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 4,778 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 4,769 | +16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 4,753 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 4,748 | +53 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 4,695 | +13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 4,682 | +21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 4,661 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 4,650 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.9%
- avg views ÷ 4,775 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 713
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (20 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 713 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 12s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 21.5% | |
| 😁 | 17 | 21.5% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 15.2% | |
| 🤓 | 9 | 11.4% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 11.4% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 8.86% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @allmist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
饥荒手游联机版上线了! 遗憾的是国内版依然遥遥无期,其实国际版也能玩,但是可能需要加速一下。 去 b 站看了别人的体验视频和评论,发现刚刚上线有一些bug,后面再说吧。
日本作家东野圭吾逝世
🙏7👏3😭1
【邪修速通法解析】 鉴于很多人已经迫不及待私信我微信滴滴我了🙄 直接上操作流程手把手教一遍。 1.你需要一个伪装成中介的抖音or小红书号,从昵称到头像到简介都做成让人一看就明白你是做什么的,当然用词不能露骨,不然限流封号概率大,半遮半掩即可。 2.发帖定位。以莆田为例,我大概率需要把帖子发帖地定位在莆田学院,自己所在城市有大学城的直接定位大学城即可,毕竟我们需要的是年轻女大。 3.发帖内容和tag。最简单的文本生成单图即可,重点在于内容。还是以莆田举例,文案可以是“莆田真就没有喜欢年上sugerdady的女大了吗?”“谈个会爆金币的男友真的太爽了”“男朋友每个月给我8000生活费,在xx学校属于什么水准?”“男朋友每次约会前都给我打钱,不晓得他什么意思”,重点在于让看到的人一眼就看懂这是个什么帖子。 然后就是tag的选择,爆金币,年上男友,sugerdady,不想努力了,求包养,金币男友,类似的tag都打上即可。 3.…
👍8❤4👌1🤣1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3👍3💊1
Google 邮箱可以修改前缀了,修改后之前的邮箱仍然可以使用,想改的可以看下。 http://myaccount.google.com/google-account-email
现在USDT兑人民币都1:6.76了,太亏了,什么时候能回涨!
#睡眠 #用药 https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/4y0AsdebK0kRBwpjUmOZUw
❤3😁1
不是,假的吧?
🤯6😁3❤2
听说之前有个地方送葬接亲老是在早高峰,导致交通很堵,后来道教协会的把当地所有的风水师喊去开会,“早晚高峰不允许有吉时”。
🤓9😁2
每次解决问题的时候,都不得不感叹一句:这是真他娘的的方便。
天涯论坛恢复访问 https://www.tianya.net
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @allmist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,581,523 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wv112 · 118,731
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 9 here — alongside 8 others — read 17 August 2026
@chxpd · 153,074
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大雾弥漫” (@allmist), 4,775 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allmist.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.