你掏心掏肺对一个人好,什么也不图,只图她好,最后换来的是什么?
❤41🤣16👍7💔4👾3🕊2🎉1🙈1

Channel
@wenanle
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,192subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001868718875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wenanle |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wenanle |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 5,192 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 5,194 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 5,199 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 5,203 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 5,203 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,217 reactions across 19 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,070 | 48.3% | |
| 🔥 | 382 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 264 | 11.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 110 | 4.96% | |
| 🎉 | 53 | 2.39% | |
| 🦄 | 43 | 1.94% | |
| 👌 | 37 | 1.67% | |
| 🤣 | 30 | 1.35% | |
| 🍾 | 26 | 1.17% | |
| 🌚 | 22 | 0.992% | |
| 🍓 | 22 | 0.992% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 0.812% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 0.631% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 0.631% | |
| 😡 | 13 | 0.586% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 0.541% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 0.451% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 0.451% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 0.451% | |
| 👨💻 | 8 | 0.361% | |
| 14 further kinds | 49 | 2.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,217reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2024 to 6 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
你掏心掏肺对一个人好,什么也不图,只图她好,最后换来的是什么?
❤41🤣16👍7💔4👾3🕊2🎉1🙈1
有人相遇使你相信人间值得, 有人相遇教你人间清醒
👍24❤9❤🔥2👾2🎉1
无聊来吃瓜频道打发时间👉 @cgbg8
❤8🎉1
孤独本是常态,逢人不必多言 倘若深情被辜负,余生孤独又何妨。
👍14❤4
习惯无言 习惯独孤 习惯一个人解决所有事情
😭11👍8❤6💔4🤣2
成年人的世界,钱难赚是真的,心难交是真的,无助是真的,回头一看,没有人依靠也是真的
👍14❤9
无论你处于什么状态 你都要明白 生活的目标是健康和快乐呀🍭。
❤16😭3👍2
当你不能够再拥有的时候,唯一可以做的,就是令自己不要忘记。
❤1
“有些东西,不是原路返回,就能找得到的。” 你依然在我的心里,占据着很重要的位置,但是我对你再也不抱任何幻想了,我无法控制自己对你的难以忘怀,可是关于你的一切已经再也没有了期待,虽然还是会想你,但也不是非你不可了,我想和你好好说话,站在你的角度去换位思考,你却偏要在我愿意这么温柔,这么放低姿态的时候,说出更伤我心的话。你从来不清楚我放弃了什么,我的骄傲,我的执拗,我的自尊,我的底线。我为你做过什么你永远都不会知道,就像抽烟的人永远闻不到自己身上的味道,被爱的人永远不知道爱你的人有多辛苦。 我把不舍还给你,心动还给你,自由还给你,和你最甜美的梦还给你,平静还给你,思念还给你,一意孤行和未来所有的希望全部统统还给你! 我不在期待,有任何惊喜的事情发生,只希望,不要有突如其来的烦恼,足矣!
❤21👍11🤝2
都进去群啥都有的哦进去后先发个消息 发个1也可以👉 @xv0123
岁月不及念,一晃又一秋 , 渐寒,添衣,无病!
❤12❤🔥2
释怀了要好好生活
👍15❤14🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wenanle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,307,132 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“灵魂🫦文案馆” (@wenanle), 5,192 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wenanle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.