Channel
@qsty789
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,516subscribers
-165 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001908080178 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @qsty789 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/qsty789 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 3,516 | -168 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:40 | 3,684 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 3,681 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,106 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 —————————————-- 华盛顿神秘人 (女) vs 亚特兰大梦想 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/08 07:30 让分[欧洲盘] 亚特兰大梦想 (女) -6.5@1.87 —————————————-- 康涅狄格阳光 (女) vs 凤凰城水星 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/08 07:30 总分大小[欧洲盘] 大 174.5@1.87 —————————————-- 达拉斯飞翼 (女) vs 金州瓦尔基里 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/08 09:30 让分[欧洲盘] 达拉斯飞翼 (女) -1.5@1.97 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
葡萄牙超级联赛 —————————————-- 埃斯托里尔 vs 法马利康 葡萄牙超级联赛 08/08 03:15 让球[欧洲盘] 法马利康 -0/0.5@2.11 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
德国乙级联赛 —————————————-- 波鸿 vs 柏林赫塔 德国乙级联赛 08/08 02:30 让球[欧洲盘] 柏林赫塔 +0/0.5@1.84 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
英格兰足总杯-资格赛 —————————————-- 基士多尼亚 vs 哈士汀联 英格兰足总杯-资格赛 08/08 02:45 大/小[欧洲盘] 大 3/3.5@1.96 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
👍1
南澳大利亚州联赛 —————————————-- 塞利斯贝瑞联 vs 南阿德莱德黑豹 南澳大利亚州联赛 08/06 18:00 让球[欧洲盘] 塞利斯贝瑞联 -1@1.93 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 —————————————-- 亚特兰大梦想 (女) vs 凤凰城水星 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/06 07:00 让分[欧洲盘] 凤凰城水星 (女) +6.5@1.89 —————————————-- 纽约自由人 (女) vs 西雅图风暴 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/06 07:00 让分[欧洲盘] 纽约自由人 (女) -7.5@1.88 —————————————-- 华盛顿神秘人 (女) vs 达拉斯飞翼 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/06 07:30 让分[欧洲盘] 达拉斯飞翼 (女) -1.5@2.04 —————————————-- 芝加哥天空 (女) vs 洛杉矶火花 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/06 09:00 让分[欧洲盘] 洛杉矶火花 (女) +3.5@1.93 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红…
💩1
巴西杯 —————————————-- 克鲁塞罗MG vs 沙佩科恩斯 巴西杯 08/06 06:00 让球[欧洲盘] 克鲁塞罗MG -1.5@2.03 —————————————-- 格雷米奥 vs 米拉索尔 巴西杯 08/06 06:30 让球[欧洲盘] 米拉索尔 +0.5@1.80 —————————————-- 弗鲁米嫩塞RJ vs 瓦斯科达伽马 巴西杯 08/06 08:30 让球[欧洲盘] 弗鲁米嫩塞RJ -0/0.5@1.94 —————————————-- 福塔雷萨 vs 帕尔梅拉斯 巴西杯 08/06 08:30 让球[欧洲盘] 福塔雷萨 +0.5/1@1.81 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
欧足联欧洲会议联赛-资格赛 —————————————-- 布兰 vs 阿波罗利马索尔 欧足联欧洲会议联赛-资格赛 08/06 01:00 大/小[欧洲盘] 小 3@1.85 —————————————-- 帕纳辛纳科斯 vs 中央陆军 1948 欧足联欧洲会议联赛-资格赛 08/06 02:30 让球[欧洲盘] 帕纳辛纳科斯 -1.5/2@2.01 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
欧足联欧洲联赛-资格赛 —————————————-- 费伦茨瓦罗斯 vs 扎布热矿工 欧足联欧洲联赛-资格赛 08/06 02:15 让球[欧洲盘] 费伦茨瓦罗斯 -0.5/1@1.78 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
欧洲冠军联赛-资格赛 —————————————-- 奥胡斯 vs 萨巴赫 欧洲冠军联赛-资格赛 08/06 00:30 让球[欧洲盘] 奥胡斯 -0.5/1@1.86 —————————————-- 费内巴切 vs 格拉茨风暴 欧洲冠军联赛-资格赛 08/06 02:00 大/小[欧洲盘] 大 3@1.77 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
球会友谊赛 —————————————-- 比利亚雷亚尔 vs 莱万特 球会友谊赛 08/05 16:00 让球[欧洲盘] 比利亚雷亚尔 -0.5@1.87 —————————————-- 加的斯 vs 格拉纳达 球会友谊赛 08/05 16:00 大/小[欧洲盘] 大 2/2.5@1.93 —————————————-- 托莱多 vs 纳华尔卡内罗 球会友谊赛 08/05 16:00 让球[欧洲盘] 纳华尔卡内罗 0@1.82 —————————————-- AC米兰 vs 国际米兰 球会友谊赛 08/05 19:00 大/小[欧洲盘] 大 3@1.85 —————————————-- 切尔西 vs 尤文图斯 球会友谊赛 08/05 19:30 让球[欧洲盘] 切尔西 -0.5@1.96 —————————————-- 那不勒斯 vs 奥萨苏纳 球会友谊赛 08/06 00:30 让球[欧洲盘] 奥萨苏纳 +0.5/1@1.8…
WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 —————————————-- 金州瓦尔基里 (女) vs 多伦多节奏报 (女) WNBA 美国职业女子篮球联赛 08/05 10:00 让分[欧洲盘] 金州瓦尔基里 (女) -12.5@1.89 —————————————-- 赛事无神、红黑莫怪、仅供参考
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @qsty789. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,808 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 58 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“球速体育 精准赛事推荐、足球、NBA篮球|世界杯” (@qsty789), 3,516 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/qsty789.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.