Channel
@crypto_master_pro_signals
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,925subscribers
+5,412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001731824628 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_master_pro_signals |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 48 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_master_pro_signals |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 35,925 | -78 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 36,003 | -121 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:41 | 36,124 | -118 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 36,242 | -39 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:25 | 36,281 | -115 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:31 | 36,396 | -335 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 36,731 | -328 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 37,059 | -287 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 37,346 | -654 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 38,000 | -2,312 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 02:46 | 40,312 | +2,400 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 37,912 | -2,961 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 40,873 | -449 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 41,322 | -2,535 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 43,857 | -254 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 44,111 | +94 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 44,017 | -308 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 44,325 | -670 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 44,995 | -1,109 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 46,104 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 150 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (29 July 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 128,113 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 22:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
One of the best feelings in the world is knowing that your work benefits others and that your efforts are not in vain! 😎 Thank you to everyone who supported us and is with us on this team! Together we are strong! 🔥 @CryptoMillionaire321
💸😎 Guys, just remember one thing - if you are not with us - you are not making money 😎💸 Because we can make it on any market - on a raising, on a falling - we dont care, we just make it 💸🤩 @CryptoMillionaire321
Aren't you tired of seeing all our members make a quick profit?😉 Aren't you tired of standing on the sidelines as spectators, afraid to put some of your money into our subscriptions?🤨 Come on guys. Our strategy is screwing the market every day and you don't want to take your share of the cake?🙄 (Note: discounted price available for today🤩) Become a winner 💯 @CryptoMillionaire321
1️⃣0️⃣5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣🔣 total profit — some cases of our portfolio 💎 As you see, we trade in different directions, but also we tend to keep the hand on the pulse of the market. 😎 For example, when there was an overall correction recently (which is still going, but will come to an end soon), most of our 100% results were shorts 🤔 If you are curious, you may trace how it is done by scrolling the chronicles of the last few …
If you thought these results were isolated from our VIPs — then take a look at those awesome reviews 🔥 So much of the profit grabbed. Our congratulations 🥳
One of the best feelings in the world is knowing that your work benefits others and that your efforts are not in vain! 😎 Thank you to everyone who supported us and is with us on this team! Together we are strong! 🔥 @CryptoMillionaire321
It was so predictable. Not for everyone I admit. You have to have the knowledge And the right tool. Which allows you to make profit on any market movement. And we have that 🫡 If you lose money every time the market falls it's not normal. join our premium now to make money, all the time, no matter what the market does 🤨 @CryptoMillionaire321
The progress of this VIP-champion is clearly shown in the green numbers 😏 Our congratulations, you did a great and patient job 🫡 @CryptoMillionaire321
💸😎 Guys, just remember one thing - if you are not with us - you are not making money 😎💸 Because we can make it on any market - on a raising, on a falling - we dont care, we just make it 💸🤩 @CryptoMillionaire321
For those who are still waiting for a miracle 😎 A miracle is near 💯 You just need to take it ‼️ @CryptoMillionaire321
Some of our starships, mostly in long 🚀 Bring yourself into the action now! Imagine that you had your savings in these beauties — the Force itself unleashed 🔥 Join the VIP-team of true jedis for the same results 👇 @CryptoMillionaire321
And Some Results From Our Premium Members🔥 That is what you missed🥹
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @crypto_master_pro_signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO MASTER PRO ®️ (FUTURES TRADING)” (@crypto_master_pro_signals), 35,925 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_master_pro_signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.