Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اخبار جهادی (اخبار جنگ)

@akhbarjahadi

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

62,581subscribers

+2,445 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008931155
TypeChannel
Username@akhbarjahadi
Created2 November 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/akhbarjahadi

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “اخبار جهادی — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@akhbarjahadi/46390 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC@MilitaryMedia_FA/184816 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC0.98under a minute
@akhbarjahadi/46389 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC@MilitaryMedia_FA/184786 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC0.98under a minute
@akhbarjahadi/46407 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC@MilitaryMedia_FA/185007 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC0.98under a minute
@akhbarjahadi/46401 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC@MilitaryMedia_FA/184947 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC0.96under a minute
@akhbarjahadi/46406 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC@MilitaryMedia_FA/184987 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC0.95under a minute
@akhbarjahadi/46384 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC@MilitaryMedia_FA/184736 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC0.9512 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MilitaryMedia_FA7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.96under a minutethis entry (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 48 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @akhbarjahadi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

60,13669,31764,726.55 August 2026 — 60,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,136 subscribers6 August 2026 — 61,641 subscribers7 August 2026 — 69,317 subscribers8 August 2026 — 66,352 subscribers9 August 2026 — 64,391 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,914 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,685 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,581 subscribers62,5815 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2,445. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,759–70,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:1362,581-104
11 Aug 2026, 19:5762,685-229
10 Aug 2026, 22:1162,914-1,477
9 Aug 2026, 20:5364,391-1,961
8 Aug 2026, 19:0066,352-2,965
7 Aug 2026, 17:1869,317+7,676
6 Aug 2026, 17:1061,641+1,505
6 Aug 2026, 01:3660,136no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:0660,136first reading

Engagement

122 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.34%
avg views ÷ 62,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,850
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
122
of 122 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held122 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total713,324
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26m 08s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈5,870 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#ایران #آمریکا 🔴کارشناس روس: آمریکا در حمله زمینی به ایران با حمام خون روبه‌رو می‌شود ▪️میخائیل مارگلوف، معاون شورای روابط بین‌الملل روسیه، احتمال داده است که آمریکا پس از انتخابات میان‌دوره‌ای کنگره در نوامبر، گزینه عملیات زمینی علیه ایران را بررسی کند. به گفته او، نتیجه انتخابات و میزان شکست احتمالی جمهوری‌خواهان می‌تواند بر تصمیم‌های بعدی دونالد ترامپ تأثیر بگذارد و حتی زمینه را برای اقدامی نظامی در اواخر سال ۲۰۲

12 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC≈5,860 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#ایران #آمریکا 🔴فایننشال‌تایمز: ایران، نمونه‌ای از شکست الگوی جنگ‌آوری آمریکا ▪️فایننشال‌تایمز نوشته است که با وجود عملیات گسترده هوایی آمریکا علیه ایران، واشنگتن هنوز به اهداف اصلی خود نرسیده است؛ ساختار حاکمیتی ایران پابرجاست، وضعیت برنامه هسته‌ای همچنان نامشخص مانده، مذاکرات متوقف شده و حملات موشکی و تهدید علیه کشتیرانی در تنگه هرمز و دریای سرخ ادامه دارد. این روزنامه همچنین مدعی شده آمریکا ده‌ها هواگرد از جمله ج

12 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈5,900 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#لیبی 🔴حمله به زیرساخت برق الزاویه؛ خروج نیروهای جنرال الکتریک آمریکا ▪️شرکت عمومی برق لیبی اعلام کرد ایستگاه توزیع برق ۳۰/۱۱ کیلوولت در جنوب شهر الزاویه پس از حمله افراد ناشناس به طور کامل در آتش سوخت و از مدار خارج شد. این حادثه در ادامه ناآرامی‌های امنیتی اخیر، خسارات سنگینی به شبکه برق منطقه وارد کرده و پایداری تأمین انرژی را با اختلال جدی مواجه ساخته است. ▪️در پی تشدید ناامنی‌ها، شرکت آمریکایی جنرال الکتریک فع

12 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈5,890 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#یمن #عربستان 🔴عربستان سعودی واضحاً در مقابله با یمن دچار محدودیت کارت‌هاست. یکی از آخرین کارت‌های باقی مانده اما تلاشی مشترک با آمریکا جهت شعله‌ورسازی جبهات داخلی، خصوصاً تشدید در محور الحدیده با هدف کاهش اشراف و کنترل انصارالله بر دریای سرخ است. در روزهای اخیر نیز تحرکات مختلف لجستیک خصوصا از عدن به الحدیده صورت گرفته که هشدار حملات زمینی از سوی مزدوران را بالا برد و حتی در جنوب الحدیده نیز یک درگیری سنگین ۴۸ساعته

12 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈5,870 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#سوریه 🔴توافق محرمانه برای خارج کردن مواد هسته‌ای دوره اسد از سایت ۹۹ سوریه ▪️به گزارش اخبار جهادی، وبگاه آمریکایی «آکسیوس» گزارش داده است که آژانس بین‌المللی انرژی اتمی در چارچوب توافقی که با میانجی‌گری آمریکا و با هماهنگی دولت جدید سوریه و اسرائیل حاصل شده، قرار است مواد هسته‌ای باقی‌مانده از دوره حکومت بشار اسد را از یک مرکز مخفی موسوم به «سایت ۹۹» خارج کند؛ اقدامی که هدف آن جلوگیری از شکل‌گیری یک بحران امنیتی و

12 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈5,780 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🏴 تو منو رها کنی کجا برم امام حسن... ▪️کربلایی حسین طاهری 🇮🇷 @akhbarjahadi

11 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC≈5,910 viewsread 12 August 2026

#سوریه 🔴شنیده شدن صدای تیراندازی در منطقه سیده زینب دمشق، به دلیل تیراندازی نیروهای حکومت الجولانی به سوی پهپادهای ناشناس در آسمان دمشق بوده است. 🇮🇷 @akhbarjahadi | اخبار جنگ

11 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈5,830 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

📹 مگه یادم میره من بودم و یه گل پرپر... ▪️حاج محمود کریمی 🇮🇷 @akhbarjahadi

11 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC≈5,920 viewsread 12 August 2026

#سوریه 🔴منابع محلی از شنیده شدن صدای انفجار و تیراندازی شدید در منطقه سیده زینب دمشق خبر می‌دهند. 🇮🇷 @akhbarjahadi | اخبار جنگ

11 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC≈5,930 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

#لبنان #اسرائیل 🔴حسین پاک، کارشناس جبهه مقاومت: رژیم صهیونیستی هنوز نتوانسته بر تأسیسات مقاومت در منطقه علی‌الطاهر تسلط پیدا کند/ صهیونیست‌ها با آتشباری و حملات شیمیایی به دنبال کشف ورودی‌های این تأسیسات هستند/ ۷۷ روستا در جنوب لبنان تحت اشغال است و ۵۵ روستا به‌طور کامل از بین رفته‌اند/ صهیونیست‌ها برای کشف ورودی‌های تأسیسات علی‌الطاهر، فناوری‌های جدیدی از جمله سنسورهای حرکتی به کار گرفته‌اند. 🇮🇷 @akhbarjahadi | اخب

11 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC≈5,980 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#آمریکا 🔴نشریه شورای روابط خارجی آمریکا: زمان ترک خاورمیانه رسیده است ▪️به گزارش اخبار جهادی، فارن افرز، نشریه شورای روابط خارجه آمریکا (CFR) در گزارش اخیر خود عنوان کرد: جنگ با ایران نه‌تنها اهداف آمریکا را محقق نکرده، بلکه امنیت واشنگتن و متحدانش را نیز تضعیف کرده است. نویسنده، حضور گسترده نظامی آمریکا در خاورمیانه را عاملی می‌داند که کشورهای میزبان را در معرض حمله قرار داده و به بی‌ثباتی منطقه دامن زده است. از نگ

11 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC≈5,890 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

#سوریه #ترکیه #اسرائیل 🔴نگرانی اسرائیل از گسترش حضور نظامی ترکیه در سوریه؛ بازسازی نیروی هوایی دمشق و احتمال محدود شدن آزادی عمل تل‌آویو ▪️به گزارش اخبار جهادی، رسانه‌های اسرائیلی از افزایش نگرانی دستگاه امنیتی این رژیم نسبت به سرعت بازسازی توان نظامی سوریه و هم‌زمان گسترش نفوذ ترکیه در این کشور خبر داده‌اند. شبکه عبری کان گزارش داده است که دستگاه امنیتی اسرائیل، شتاب گرفتن روند احیای نیروی هوایی سوریه را زیر نظر دا

Showing the 12 most recent of 122 posts we hold for @akhbarjahadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@akhbarjahadi edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 436,245 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اخبار جهادی (اخبار جنگ)” (@akhbarjahadi), 62,581 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akhbarjahadi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.