IDF Veterans Release Counter-Film to Challenge "NAZA" Soldiers, commanders and intelligence officers who fought in Gaza have produced a documentary featuring battlefield testimonies, previously unseen footage and materials they say refute claims made in the film NAZA. https://www.c14news.com/article/1506480/

Channel
Channel 14 - English Edition
@c14english
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,106subscribers
-1,473 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001736293727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c14english |
| Description | Website: c14news.com Insta: instagram.com/c14english Threats: threads.com/@c14english |
| Created | 6 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c14english |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 27,106 | -186 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 27,292 | -60 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 27,352 | -62 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 27,414 | -30 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 27,444 | -56 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 27,500 | -98 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 27,598 | -56 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 27,654 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:48 | 27,680 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 27,698 | -24 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 27,722 | -35 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 27,757 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 27,790 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 27,814 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 27,839 | -39 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 27,878 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:29 | 27,908 | -50 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 27,958 | -47 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:29 | 28,005 | -53 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 28,058 | first reading |
Engagement
905 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.34%
- avg views ÷ 27,106 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,180
- 275 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.31%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 275
- of 905 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 267 of 275 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 905 (5 August 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 323,673 |
| Reactions total | 4,222 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,100
- Videos
- ≈5,200
- Links
- ≈5,760
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 34m 14s
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,240 reactions across 869 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,039 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 2,321 | 17.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1,802 | 13.6% | |
| 😈 | 1,431 | 10.8% | |
| 😱 | 817 | 6.17% | |
| 😐 | 766 | 5.79% | |
| 🙏 | 552 | 4.17% | |
| 🍾 | 361 | 2.73% | |
| 💔 | 350 | 2.64% | |
| 👻 | 295 | 2.23% | |
| 👀 | 266 | 2.01% | |
| 💯 | 263 | 1.99% | |
| 😭 | 207 | 1.56% | |
| 🐳 | 160 | 1.21% | |
| 🕊 | 126 | 0.952% | |
| 😎 | 117 | 0.884% | |
| 🦄 | 112 | 0.846% | |
| ⚡ | 100 | 0.755% | |
| 🤝 | 69 | 0.521% | |
| 🏆 | 53 | 0.4% | |
| 2 further kinds | 33 | 0.249% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 889 of the 905 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,635 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 905 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 14
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 13
- of 905 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @c14english. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 905 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Netanyahu Warns UAE: Iran Rushing Underground Nuke Site Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shared critical intelligence with UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed and a senior Saudi security official on Wednesday, revealing accelerated underground construction at Iran's fortified "Pickaxe Mountain" site near Natanz. According to satellite findings and Israeli intelligence, Tehran is racing to shield its nuclear asse…
🦄2
Iran Says It Received U.S. Response to Ceasefire Proposal Iran announced on Wednesday that it received an official response from the United States regarding its proposal to restore a ceasefire in the Persian Gulf, mediated through Qatari backchannels. Despite President Donald Trump's public rejection of Tehran's initiative—which offered to reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz within seven days in exchange for Washingto…
🔥3👀1
Iran Braces for What It Fears Most: Mass Uprising Mounting panic within Tehran's ruling elite has triggered an extraordinary security mobilization across Iran's major urban centers. Facing renewed student protests at Allameh Tabataba'i University over draconian hijab mandates, soaring living costs, and political repression, the regime placed security forces on full alert, deployed an estimated 51,000 personnel throu…
👍6😈2🔥1🕊1😭1😱1
Iraqi Writer Defends Netanyahu at UN, Stuns TV Host Iraqi author and political thinker Ghaith al-Tamimi sparked a widespread firestorm across Arab media after delivering an unprecedented, fiery defense of Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a live television interview on The Hard Question. Al-Tamimi declared that he applauded Netanyahu’s UN General Assembly address for fiercely protecting Israeli cit…
❤11😈1
Human Remains Found in Open Area Near Tel Aviv Police are investigating after a passerby discovered human skeletal remains in an open area near HaShiva Junction in central Israel. The remains have been sent to the forensic institute for identification. https://www.c14news.com/article/1506431/
😱5😭2🍾1
🚨🇮🇱 Iran remains the main suspect. Israeli security chiefs from the IDF, Shin Bet, and Mossad are increasingly assessing the mid-air emergency aboard Flydubai Flight FZ1073 as an attempted terror attack. If this is a state-sponsored terror attack, Iran is the only regional actor with the operational capability to plan and execute such an operation, security experts believe.
👍18😐4❤2🐳1😱1
🚨🇮🇷 IRGC & Iran’s army are arming and training hundreds of thousands of civilians in Tehran and major cities. Internal IRGC assessments reveal they are bracing for a massive multi-front war against a coalition of the US, Israel, NATO, Arab states, and internal opposition groups. 📹Iran TV
😈17👻3💔3👍2😱2❤1🔥1🕊1
Passengers Heroically Stopped Omani Pilot From Crashing Plane Initial accounts reveal that the pilot attempted to hijack the plane and crash it in a deadly dive; the quick thinking and courage of Israeli passengers—who lunged at him and struggled with him alongside the co-pilot—prevented a certain aviation disaster. https://www.c14news.com/article/1506385/
❤15👍4😱2💔1
🚨 Israel is now classifying the incident as an attempted terrorist attack, with speculation that the pilot who allegedly attempted to hijack the plane tried to commit a 9/11-style attack.
😱15💔5😈3❤1👻1
"There was blood everywhere." Yasmin Abu Kasis shares the terrifying first eyewitness account from her daughter Miriam, a passenger on the flight, who witnessed a man with a knife attack the pilot amid chaotic screaming.
😱14🔥2👻1🙏1
Cockpit Brawl Triggers Hijack Alert on Dubai-Tel Aviv Flight A Fly Dubai flight carrying 180 Israelis activated the rare "7500" hijack code after a physical fight erupted between the captain and co-pilot, forcing the plane to turn back to Dubai and briefly halting departures from Ben Gurion Airport. https://www.c14news.com/article/1506362/
😱11😐5❤1👻1🔥1😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 905 posts we hold for @c14english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🗳️ Trump warned "there will be very little left or the Republic of Iran" if they strike back. Will Iran launch another round of military retaliation?
- No14%
- Yes88%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 905 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@middle_east_spectator · 404,635#1
@Onfrabmusic · 48,434#2
@beholdisraelchannel · 568,741#3
@BellumActaNews · 114,324#4
@Intelsky · 20,677#5
@rnintel · 167,707#6
@Singranesh · 4,494#7
@DDGeopolitics · 191,018#8
@ETReport · 15,700#9
@hnaftali · 120,495#10
@warmonitors · 152,372#11
@DefenseBlog · 7,717#12
@ClashReport · 109,621#13
@IsraelWarLive · 31,200#14
@Intel_Republic12 · 96,729#15
@MilitaryEvents · 2,828#16
@yediotnews25 · 611,768#17
@medmannews · 76,756#18
@insiderpaper · 108,525#19
@LebUpdate · 77,232#20
@iran_jahan_darlahze · 75,834#21
@IsraelinFarsi · 116,434#22
@m_Mahdibaba · 138,410#23
@saberin_ir · 1,095,631#24
@jangaavaran1390 · 137,352#25
@saberinfa · 1,013,699#26
@mamlekate · 566,935#27
@persiannbloomberg · 108,802#28
@kianmeli1 · 339,550#29
@idfinfarsi · 96,727#30
@entekhab_ir · 205,558#31
@mahdaviatsiasi · 170,818#32
@nezamitarin · 86,031#33
@akhbarJM · 68,739#34
@final_battle313 · 64,962#35
@cataphract1 · 59,976#36
@alonews · 1,021,488#37
@sarbazane_g · 316,051#38
@CIG_telegram · 115,278#39
@rastahkez_official · 10,082#40
@partisan2015 · 62,699#41
@Military_Times_Blog · 13,711#42
@WAR_ROOM_NEWS · 16,471#43
@sepehrazadi · 346,481#44
@iran_daily24 · 17,498#45
@euronewspe · 147,732#46
@keivanrus · 362#47
@froopashee2 · 10,635#48
@seday_zoohoor · 16,180#49
@Minas_Tirith2024 · 42,627#50
@defence_news · 49,655#51
@NISHTMANIJOAN · 145,555#52
@radisorg · 23,365#53
@aafakhravar · 75,595#54
@charik_media · 64,459#55
@worldwar3ir · 40,173#56
@farsivoa · 133,108#57
@sepah_quds · 555,993#58
@EpochTimesPersian · 11,567#59
@idfofficial · 160,400#60
@BattlefieldInfo · 4,661#61
@mhrezaa2 · 39,446#62
@snntv · 134,205#63
@AjaNews_fa1 · 2,246#64
@dw_farsi · 114,703#65
@arabworld301news · 179,734#66
@iranintltv · 1,364,042#67
@bisimchimedia · 1,087,889#68
@khabar_fouri · 1,176,107#69
@bbcpersian · 771,942#70
@akhbarefori · 4,276,028#71
@farsna · 1,814,330#72
@Alarabiya_far · 81,592#73
@syriankhabar · 89,339#74
@Tasnimnews · 2,502,598#75
@vahidonline · 1,399,039#76
@sahamnewsorg · 217,606#77
@EfshaKhabar · 270,089#78
@Indypersian · 73,892#79
@manototv · 379,440#80
@zadolmosafer · 8,595#81
@efshagari · 595,229#82
@javanmardi77 · 202,895#83
@timesofisraelpersian · 5,377#84
@Namayandeh3oma · 293,019#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@TerrorAlarmPersian · 29,676
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@idfinfarsi · 96,727
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
@iran_jahan_darlahze · 75,834
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@IsraelinFarsi · 116,434
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@antiluminati · 31,884
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
@jadouye_zehn · 21,631
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 September 2026
@aafakhravar · 75,595
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
@radisorg · 23,365
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
@Rfrens · 54,756
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@Israel_Studies · 29,314
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
@shoureshgarane · 99,070
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@dorrtv · 611,564
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
@akhbarjahadi · 58,519
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
@Alarabiya_far · 81,592
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Channel 14 - English Edition” (@c14english), 27,106 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c14english.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.