International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 56 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,894–30,241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Oct 2026, 12:55
30,168
-33
18 Sept 2026, 07:17
30,201
+41
15 Sept 2026, 23:39
30,160
-11
14 Sept 2026, 06:38
30,171
-21
12 Sept 2026, 11:58
30,192
+12
10 Sept 2026, 11:18
30,180
+131
7 Sept 2026, 06:15
30,049
-72
4 Sept 2026, 09:20
30,121
+130
2 Sept 2026, 20:39
29,991
+57
1 Sept 2026, 16:16
29,934
-18
31 Aug 2026, 13:26
29,952
+12
30 Aug 2026, 10:42
29,940
-19
29 Aug 2026, 08:27
29,959
-20
28 Aug 2026, 11:37
29,979
-15
27 Aug 2026, 11:55
29,994
-1
26 Aug 2026, 13:09
29,995
+11
25 Aug 2026, 15:33
29,984
-20
24 Aug 2026, 13:47
30,004
-16
22 Aug 2026, 19:04
30,020
-28
21 Aug 2026, 10:09
30,048
first reading
Engagement
1,150 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.30%
avg views ÷ 30,168 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
496 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
496
of 1,150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 490 of 496 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
1,150 (5 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
643,157
Reactions total
20,205
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 09:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈21,900
Videos
≈8,730
Links
≈1,260
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 14m
Average length
1m 27s
Measured directly from 298 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35,460 reactions across 980 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
13,600
38.4%
🤬
11,472
32.4%
👏
4,047
11.4%
💔
2,093
5.90%
🔥
1,695
4.78%
😍
1,528
4.31%
😭
520
1.47%
🤔
305
0.86%
😱
200
0.564%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 980 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,460 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴تیراندازی و درگیری مسلحانه سپاه با تروریستها در راسک
بررسی میدانی خبرنگار تسنیم از وقوع درگیری مسلحانه میان رزمندگان اسلام و عناصر یک گروه تروریستی در یکی از روستاهای شهرستان راسک در جنوب سیستان و بلوچستان حکایت دارد.
بر اساس اطلاعات اولیه، درگیری مسلحانه در این منطقه رخ داده و نیروهای رزمنده در حال پاکسازی منطقه و بررسی وضعیت هستند.
جزئیات بیشتری از این درگیری و وضعیت عناصر تروریستی تاکنون اعلام نشده است و اخب…
🔴 سربند سفید لاالهالاالله از تروریستهایی که امروز در مرادآباد زاهدان کشته شدند پیدا شده و بمبهای کنار جادهای؛ M16؛ نارنجکهای ۴۰ تیکه؛ استارلینک!
بنظرتون چه ارتباطی بین سربندها و این تجهیزات هست؟
جوابش در اسلحه آمریکایی M16 و استارلینک اسرائیلی تروریست هاست.
#اسلام_آمریکایی
〰〰〰〰
@Zohour_I12
🔴 دکتر خانعلیزاده :
سیدعباس عراقچی انقدر در نیویورک ماند تا نهایتاً با دستور مارکو روبیو او را اخراج کردند‼️‼️‼️
ادامه حضور عراقچی در جایگاه وزارت امور خارجه بزرگترین مانع برای تحقق منافع ملی در حوزهی دیپلماسی است.نمایندگان محترم مجلس هر چقدر زودتر به اقدامات بدون مجوز وخلاف دستور رهبری او در جریان سفر به آمریکا رسیدگی کند، آسیب کمتری به منافع ملی ایران وارد خواهد شد.
✍ فضاحت و دریوزگی از این بالاتر هم مگه داریم…
🔴سالهاست دروغِ اهانتِ حجتالاسلام رسایی به شهید سلیمانی، ناجوانمردانه، توسط بخشی از هواداران آقای قالیباف بازپراکنی میشود!
خیلیها میدانستند دروغ است و مردم انتظار داشتند این خباثت رسانهای را محکوم و از مظلوم حمایت کنند، که نکردند!!
شایعهپذیرها هم مدیون هستند.
اما امروز با اثبات شکایت آقای قالیباف و کذب بودن ادعای نبود شاکی خصوصی، با کمک خداوند، اهل تزویر، ناکام شده و انشاءالله این روند، پایان یابد.
رعایت …
☀️☀️☀️ حضرت امیرالمؤمنین (ع) در ذیل حوادث زمان ظهور فرمودند: شگفتا، سراسر شگفتا، میان جمادی و رجب
و در توضیح آن فرمودند:
آن زمان جمع شدن پراکندهها، برخاستن مردگان [از قبرها]، درو شدن روییدنیها [رویشها] و پیدرپی آمدن حوادث هلاککننده است. منبع: معانی الأخبار، ص۴۰۶
و در روایت دیگر از ایشان آمده است:
چه شگفتیای بزرگتر از آن که کسانی که آنها را مرده میپندارید؛ سرهای آنها که زنده میپندارید را بزنند؟ و آنان در ک…
🔴 #فوری /
در روزهای گذشته، طی ابلاغیهای به کشورهای منطقه اعلام کردهایم که اگر تا «12 اکتبر/20 مهرماه» به تحریم هوایی پایبند بمانند، فرودگاههایشان از دسترس خارج خواهد شد.
🔴 اجرای عملیات پرچم دروغین دیگر توسط آل سقوط‼️
شخصی قصد انجام عملیات انتحاری در مسجدالحرام داشته است که کمربند انفجاری وی فعال نمیشود و توسط سعودیها دستگیر شد !!!
🔴 وضعیت بلوچستان پاکستان طوری خراب هست که گروه های مسلح از خودروهای عبوری عوارض میگیرند!
بعد عاصم منیر برای ما میانجیگری میکند ! برو مملکت خودت رو درست کن ...
〰〰〰〰
@Zohour_I12
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,150 posts we hold for @Zohour_I12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Zohour_I12 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
آنتی ایلومیناتی @antiluminati · 31,884 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
امام مهدی عج @emammahdi · 32,406 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026
آیت الله بهجت (ره) @bahjat313_ir · 23,477 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
مهدویت استاد رائفی پور @raefipoor_Mahdaviat · 27,363 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
جنگ جهانی سوم WW3 @worldwar3ir · 40,173 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 August 2026
اخبار تازه @Akhbare_tazeh · 27,619 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
کانال رسمی حکیم دکتر حسین روازاده @ravazadeh · 26,013 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
آب و هوای ایرانی @iranianweather · 20,400 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 September 2026
راه امنیت @amenitMedia · 54,468 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
منتظران ظهور (امام زمان) @montazer313_ir · 21,258 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
مطالعات رژیم صهیونیستی @Israel_Studies · 29,246 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
کانال کربلا @karballa_ir · 53,945 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
🔸صائب بن مالک🔸"باید برخاست" @mahdaviatakhbar · 61,459 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
مقاومت تا ظهور @moghavemattazohur · 21,900 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
رسانه تحلیلی ظهور @tahlil_zohour · 40,805 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
Aminikhaah_Media🇵🇸 @Aminikhaah_Media · 26,621 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
🔸کیسان ابوعمره🔸 @mahdaviatsiasi · 170,818 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
سپاه پاسداران @sepahp_ir · 35,762 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
حکمت کارت اِتکا | حقوق و معیشت @akhbar_hoghogh · 26,439 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
امپراتوری مقاومت @mojahedin_iran · 28,425 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
علم زمان @time_zaman · 23,297 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
رسانه خبری فتح @news_fath · 20,117 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
فاتحین نیوز-اخبارجنگ @fateheinn_news · 91,200 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
استاد دانشمند @MehdiDaneshmand · 23,594 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ظهور نزدیک است ...” (@Zohour_I12), 30,168 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zohour_I12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.