Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Iranian Naval Force

@Navy_Iranian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,128subscribers

+168 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216699800
TypeChannel
Username@Navy_Iranian
Descriptionبه نام خالق حضرت دوست مدیریت : @Navy90iranian 🔸پیج اینستاگرامی ما : instagram.com/navy_iranian
Created11 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Navy_Iranian

Growth

18,92219,12819,0256 August 2026 — 18,960 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,960 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,958 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,948 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,928 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,922 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,923 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,985 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,992 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,093 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,128 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +168. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,891–19,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:3419,128+35
13 Aug 2026, 12:3519,093+101
12 Aug 2026, 14:5418,992+7
11 Aug 2026, 15:0718,985+62
10 Aug 2026, 18:3218,923+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:5318,922-6
8 Aug 2026, 17:4218,928-20
7 Aug 2026, 18:3618,948-10
6 Aug 2026, 18:2518,958-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:1518,960no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0418,960first reading

Engagement

89 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 19,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,760
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 89 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held89 (3 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total335,046
Reactions total4,426
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 22:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,900
Videos
1,830
Links
889

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 07s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,222 reactions across 82 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,18128.0%
97623.1%
💔81419.3%
👎3117.37%
❤‍🔥1874.43%
🥰1252.96%
🍾1162.75%
👻1112.63%
🤔721.71%
👏551.30%
🫡531.26%
😢400.947%
🤯390.924%
🗿290.687%
😎290.687%
😐290.687%
😈110.261%
🙊100.237%
😭90.213%
🎉50.118%
7 further kinds200.474%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 89 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Navy_Iranian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC452 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

ترافیک هرمز در بازه ۱۱ تا ۱۳ آگوست ⚓️ @Navy_Iranian | #a_m

6👎2

14 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,730 views129 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

#شهدای_نداجا | شهید محمد حسین قهرمانوند ، از شهدای ناو جماران @Navy_Iranian

84😢20🫡16👻6🍾2🤷‍♂1

14 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈1,850 views52 reactionsread 14 August 2026

یک چیزی بنده برای تکمیل عرض کنم. ببینید ، در میدان نبرد با نیروی دریایی آمریکا مشخصا نیروی دریایی ما هیچ شانسی نداشت و اگر نگاه کنید ، اکثر ناوهای ما با ام کیو 9 و هلفایر از بین رفتند. عملا نیروی دریایی ما شده رزومه کاری ام کیو 9 ، همان پهپادی که در زمین پهناور ممکلت مقدار زیادی از آن ساقط شده و خوراک پدافند زمین پایه ما بوده. اما اهمیت تخلیه ناو از پایگاه در کجاست؟ در اینجاست که شما بعد از اتمام جنگ اگر میخواهید

👍47👎4😎1

14 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈7,470 views124 reactionsread 14 August 2026

نیروی دریایی ما هم جالبه. مثلا زمانی که 48 الی 24 ساعت قبل حمله ناو ها باید پراکنده می شدن ، نشدن. بعد با شروع جنگ ، اون فرمانده ای که دید نمیشه توی 20 دقیقه ناو ها رو پراکنده کنه و برای جلوگیری از شهادت پرسنل ، دستور تخلیه پایگاه رو داده ، محاکمه میشه اما اون فرمانده ای که دستور پراکنده کردن ناو رو داده و باعث شهادت پرسنل توی ناو اون هم توی اسکله شده ، ترفیع میگیره. @Navy_Iranian | #A_A

💔101👍10🤔7🍾3👎2👻1

14 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈2,490 views40 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ناوگروه واشنگتن که عازم سنتکام است ، در مسیر عبور از تنگه سنگاپور ، مستقیما از کنار 10 نفتکش ایرانی عبور کرد. @Navy_Iranian | #S_S

🥰28👎7👍5

14 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈2,450 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ناوگروه واشنگتن حال عبور از تنگه سنگاپور این ناوگروه از ناو هواپیمابر جورج واشنگتن (CVN 73) ، ناوشکن واس‌اس رابرت اسمالز (CG 62) کلاس Ticonderoga و ناوشکن واس‌اس شوپ (DDG 86) از کلاس ارلی برک تشکیل شده است. تنها 1 الی 2 روز دریانوردی تا ورود به منطقه سنتکام فاصله دارند و و برای رسیدن به دریای عرب حداقل 8 روز و حداکثر 15 روز فاصله دارند. @Navy_Iranian | #A_A

21👎5👍3

14 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC524 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🔰 همراه با ما در آسمان نظامی گری به پرواز درآیید تا در کنار هم افق های تازه ای در این عرصه را به نظاره بنشینیم! اتحادیه هما، مجموعه ای پیشرو از کانال های نظامی-تحلیلی با ارائه جدیدترین اخبار از تحولات و رویدادهای منطقه و جهان در کنار معرفی و بررسی حوزه تسلیحات، ادوات و تاکتیک های نظامی و بررسی آینده پژوهانه این حوزه ها

5👻2👎1

14 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈2,160 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

در حالی که ناوهواپیمابر جورج واشنگتن در حال حرکت به سمت دریای عرب برای جایگزینی با ناو آبراهام لینکلن است ، ناو هواپیمابر تئودور روزولت (CVN-71 ) در پایگاه جزیره نورت آیلند، سن‌دیگو پهلو گرفته است. باگر وضعیت ناوهواپیمابر های آمریکایی را بررسی کنیم ، موضوع قابل حدس میشود. لینکلن 9 ماه در حال فعالیت است و مجبور است برای اورهال برگردد. واشنگتن در 8 الی 15 روز آینده جایگزین آن میشود و سپس روزولت به ژاپن اعزام میشود

👍124👎1😢1

14 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,270 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026

چرا کاتاپولت بخار بجای الکترومغناطیسی؟ از وقتی که ترامپ به ریاست جمهوری آمریکا بازگشته است، سیاست کاهش پیچیدگی و افزایش قابلیت اطمینان را در پیش گرفته است و این تصمیم هم بخشی از آن سیاست است. به‌طور کلی بر روی کاغذ کاتاپولت الکترومغناطیسی نسبت‌به کاتاپولت بخار، نرخ پرتاب بیشتری دارد و می‌تواند پرتاب‌های پشت‌سرهم را بدون افت فشار یا گرمای بخار انجام دهد و یک‌سری پیچیدگی‌های مکانیکی را ندارد ولی خب طی استفاده عملیاتی

👍183

14 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,640 views65 reactionsread 14 August 2026

آلودگی نفتی ۳.۲ هکتار از سواحل قشم معاون محیط‌زیست دریایی و تالاب‌های سازمان حفاظت محیط‌زیست: برآوردهای اولیه نشان می‌دهد ۳.۲ هکتار از سواحل و ۹ هکتار از آب‌های ساحلی درگیر این آلودگی شده‌اند. سواحل سوزا، شیب‌دراز، نقاشه، محدوده جنگل‌های حرا و بخش‌هایی از جزیره هنگام از مناطق آلوده اعلام شده‌اند. منشأ آلودگی، دریایی اعلام شده و جریان‌های دریایی و بادهای موسمی در انتقال آن به سمت سواحل نقش داشته‌اند. عملیات پایش، ک

💔50😭82👍2👻1😈1😢1

14 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,660 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026

#تکمیلی | دستور ترامپ برای استفاده از کاتاپولت بخار به‌جای کاتاپولت الکترومغناطیسی (EMALS) از چهارمین ناو هواپیمابر کلاس فورد یعنی ناو هواپیمابر یواس‌اس دوریس میلر (CVN-81) اجرا خواهد شد. ⚓️ @Navy_Iranian | #Tomcat

👻13🥰4

14 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC≈3,120 views67 reactionsread 14 August 2026

ترامپ دستور داده تا برای سایر ناوهواپیمابر های کلاس فورد بجای منجنیق الکترونیک مغناطیسی از منجنیق قدیمی تر بخاری ‌که در ناوهواپیمابر های فورد استفاده شدن استفاده بشه همچنین دستور امکان سنجی بیشتر برای اعطای قرداد های ساخت تجهیزات نظامی در صنایع خارج آمریکا را هم داده است ، در کنار این دستور برسی ساخت یک کشتی سازی جدید هم داده شده ⚓️ @Navy_Iranian | #a_m

🤔42😐1510

Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @Navy_Iranian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 71,313 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

جنگاوران
@jangaavaran1390 · 138,147
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Fighter Radar | فایتر رادار
@fighter_radar · 178,962
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Iranian Naval Force” (@Navy_Iranian), 19,128 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Navy_Iranian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.