10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,583–20,768 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 15:13
20,604
-16
14 Aug 2026, 01:43
20,620
-34
12 Aug 2026, 21:56
20,654
-13
11 Aug 2026, 23:42
20,667
-41
10 Aug 2026, 21:21
20,708
+24
9 Aug 2026, 21:31
20,684
-35
8 Aug 2026, 18:33
20,719
-12
7 Aug 2026, 16:30
20,731
-16
6 Aug 2026, 20:45
20,747
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:36
20,747
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈36,300
Videos
≈25,000
Links
≈5,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
10m 55s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
197 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
37.1%
🔥
46
23.4%
👏
34
17.3%
💔
19
9.64%
🤬
12
6.09%
🤣
6
3.05%
😢
3
1.52%
👍
2
1.02%
😁
1
0.508%
🤪
1
0.508%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 197reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴خانه دکتر #کمال_خرازی ، یکی از تئورسین های خارجینظام و مشاور عالی امور خارجی رهبری را زدند؛ همسرشان به شهادت رسید و خودش مجروح
🔵دکتر خرازی گفته بودند «چون تهدید میشیم باید دکترین خودمون را عوض کنیم و بمب اتم بسازیم»
🚨#جنگ_منطقهای
@NEWS_FATH
🔴 کاربر خارجی ایکس:
تصور کنید کسی کاخ سفید را منفجر کند و رئیس جمهور را بکشد و بعد بگوید
«آرام باش رفیق، جنگ نیست، فقط یک عملیات ویژه است!»
🚨#جنگ_منطقهای
@NEWS_FATH
🔴 حملهٔ هوایی دشمن به منبع آب شهر هفتکل خوزستان
🔹معاون امنیتی و انتظامی استانداری خوزستان: لحظاتی پیش منبع آب ۱۰ هزار متر مکعبی شهر هفتکل مورد حمله هوایی رژیم های جنایتکار آمریکا و صهیونیستی قرار گرفت.
🔹در این حمله هیچ گونه تلفات جانی و مجروحیت نداشتهایم.
🔹منبع آب ذخیره مورد هدف قرار گرفته است ، منابع دیگر آبی فعال است و مشکلی برای تامین آب شرب مردم هفتکل وجود ندارد.
🚨#جنگ_منطقهای
@NEWS_FATH
🔴 شائیل بنافرایم، فعال صهیونیست:
اسرائیل امروز به شدت در حال ضربه خوردن است....
دوستانم تصاویری از مکانهای هدف قرار گرفته میفرستند که گزارش نمیشوند.
یک اسرائیلی دیگر امروز در نهاریا کشته شد.
دلتا تمام پروازهای خود را تا سپتامبر لغو کرد.
کل کشور از شدت پاسخ ایران مبهوت است.
🚨#جنگ_منطقهای
@NEWS_FATH
🔴 سخنگوی قرارگاه مرکزی خاتمالانبیا:
نیروهای مسلح به وعده صادق ۴ تا پیروزی نهایی ادامه خواهند داد
نیروهای مسلح گوش به فرمان فرمانده معظم کل قوا حضرت آیتالله العظمی سید مجتبی خامنهای عملیاتهای وعده صادق ۴ را تا پیروزی نهایی ادامه خواهند داد.
🚨#جنگ_منطقهای
@NEWS_FATH
🔥 این زبانههای آتش حاصل بوسه پهپادهای ایرانی بر بخشهای مختلفی از به فرودگاه بینالمللی کویت است که باعث خسارت قابل توجهی به سیستم رادار و آتشسوزی در مخازن سوخت فرودگاه شده است
🚨#جنگ_منطقهای
@NEWS_FATH
🔴 اعتراف رسمی آمریکا به خسارت دیدن هواپیمای هشدار زودهنگام «E‑3» در عربستان در حمله انتقامی ایران
روزنامه والاستریت ژورنال به نقل از مقامهای آمریکایی گزارش داد یک هواپیمای هشدار زودهنگام «E‑3» در حمله اخیر ایران به پایگاه «امیر سلطان» آسیب دیده است.
این هواپیما از تجهیزات کلیدی فرماندهی و کنترل هوایی ارتش آمریکا محسوب میشود.
مقامهای آمریکایی جزئیات بیشتری درباره میزان خسارت ارائه نکردهاند.
🚨#جنگ_منطقه…
🔴 هامان؛ افشاگری تهران تایمز درباره طرح آمریکایی-صهیونیستی
🔹 روزنامه انگلیسی زبان تهران تایمز خبر داد، آمریکا و رژیم صهیونیستی طرحی چند مرحلهای را برای تشدید درگیری و جنگ با ایران تدارک دیدهاند که شامل موارد زیر است؛
🔹 قطع سر شامل ترور و به شهادت رساندن مقامات مهم
🔹 حمله به زیرساختهای شهرهای اصلی
🔹 هجوم نیروی زمینی شامل ورود تکفیریها به استعداد ۴۰۰۰ نفر از شمال غرب
🔹 ۲۵۰۰ نیروی آمریکایی از بحرین
🔹 ۲۵۰۰ نیر…
👏5🤪1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @news_fath. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 626,174 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🔸کیسان ابوعمره🔸 @mahdaviatsiasi · 176,186 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
محمد مهدی بابایی - اخبار جنگ @m_Mahdibaba · 140,083 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رسانه خبری فتح” (@news_fath), 20,604 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/news_fath.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.