Скоро…
🔥16👍2

Channel
@agentschool
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,904subscribers
-81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001396145585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agentschool |
| Description | Уведомление о включении в реестр №011150. Продукты налоговой школы ⤵️ https://barancha.ru/index Оставить заявку на консультацию ⤵️ https://www.bplaw.ru/consulting#choose_form Есть вопросы? Напишите ⤵️ @anastasia_nalogi https://vk.com/agent.school |
| Created | 11 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agentschool |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 24,904 | -15 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 24,919 | -3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 24,922 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 24,926 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 24,931 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 24,930 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 24,929 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:03 | 24,944 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 24,946 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 24,947 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 24,948 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 24,944 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 24,952 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 24,953 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 24,945 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 24,949 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 24,958 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 24,960 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 24,963 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 24,966 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (21 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,378 |
| Reactions total | 167 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
408 reactions across 56 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 148 | 36.3% | |
| ❤ | 117 | 28.7% | |
| 👍 | 88 | 21.6% | |
| 🙊 | 21 | 5.15% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5271795910270002717 | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.98% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.735% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.245% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.245% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.245% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Скоро…
🔥16👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥10👍1
Немного дачных мотивов ))
🔥12
🍂 Знаете, что мне особенно нравится в осени? Когда на улице становится прохладнее, появляется больше желания остановиться, выдохнуть и наконец разобраться с тем, что давно откладывал. С профессиональными знаниями — примерно так же. У каждого специалиста есть темы, в которых он уверен. А есть те самые: «Вот это надо бы изучить…» «Когда-нибудь разберусь…» «Сейчас некогда, потом посмотрю…» А потом именно этот вопрос поя…
❤2👍2🔥1
🚨 ФНС усиливает цифровой контроль. И теперь одной фразы «у нас всё по Закону и документы есть » может быть недостаточно. Российский бизнес столкнулся с новой реальностью: налоговые органы всё активнее используют алгоритмы для поиска подозрительных цепочек по НДС. Как пишет Forbes, после крупного дела о фиктивных налоговых вычетах в 2026 году под дополнительное внимание попали тысячи компаний, в том числе те, кто на…
❤5🔥3🤔2🤯1
🍂 Осень — время возвращаться к рабочему ритму. После отпусков снова сделки, показы, переговоры, звонки клиентов. И вместе с ними — вопросы, на которые риэлтору важно уметь ответить уверенно: «А какой налог я заплачу при продаже?» «Мне положен вычет?» «А если это коммерческая недвижимость?» «Что будет, если я продам квартиру после ремонта?» «А здесь нужен нотариус?» И вот здесь есть важный момент. Клиенту не всегда до…
👍2🔥1
⚡️Минфин предложил включить пассивные доходы в основную налоговую базу НДФЛ 📗Минфин готовит важные изменения в Налоговый кодекс — в рамках бюджетного пакета ведомство предлагает унифицировать налогообложение пассивных доходов и включить их в основную налоговую базу по НДФЛ. 🎯 Цель — сделать систему более устойчивой, а подход к ставкам более справедливым. ⁉️ Что именно хотят изменить: пассивные доходы (дивиденды, п…
😱5😢4👏2
🍂 Дорогие подписчики! Осень начинаем с предложения, которое я не планирую оставлять надолго. 🔥 Сегодня открываем осеннюю распродажу платных эфиров Налоговой школы — все записи по 990 ₽. Причём речь не о нескольких отдельных эфирах. По 990 ₽ сейчас можно забрать записи вебинаров, которые раньше стоили 2 990, 3 690 и даже 4 990 ₽. Именно поэтому я советую не откладывать. Потому что когда распродажа закончится, 990 ₽ за…
🔥5👍4❤2🫡1
⚡️ Минстрой разъяснил: зоны затопления не станут основанием для отказа во вводе домов в эксплуатацию В связи с вступлением в силу Федерального закона от 4 августа 2026 г. № 301-ФЗ, Минстрой России выпустил важное разъяснение (письмо № 54339-ИФ/08 от 02.09.2026) касательно объектов, строительство которых началось до введения новых требований. Суть позиции ведомства: 🏗 Приоритет выданных разрешений Если разрешение …
🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3
🔐 Защитите свой риэлторский бизнес: поможем встать на учёт в Росфинмониторинге и закрыть отчётность без стресса! Услуга по постановке на учёт в Росфинмониторинге 🔥 Вам не придётся разбираться в нюансах закона в одиночку. 📜 Почему это обязательно? По закону (ст. 5 ФЗ от 07.08.2001 № 115‑ФЗ) ИП и компании, которые оказывают посреднические услуги при сделках с недвижимостью, обязаны встать на учёт в Росфинмониторинге…
👍4⚡2❤1
Уважаемые коллеги! В пятницу, 25 сентября в 18:00 мск завершается регистрация на Московский жилищный конгресс (5-9 октября, ЦМТ) по всем пакетам участия. По промокоду БАРАНЧА вам доступны особые условия участия в Московском Международном жилищном конгрессе (5-9 октября, ЦМТ): ✅ 15% cкидка на пакеты «СТАНДАРТ», «ПРЕМИУМ» и «ВИП»; ✅ 30% cкидка на пакет «ВХОДНОЙ». Успейте зарегистрироваться до 25 сентября в 18:00 м…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @agentschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@agentschool edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Налоговая школа Вадима Баранча” (@agentschool), 24,904 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agentschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.