Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 98 days, net +685. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,560–11,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 10:46
11,403
+5
10 Nov 2026, 10:56
11,398
+6
7 Nov 2026, 14:46
11,392
+3
5 Nov 2026, 10:26
11,389
+5
3 Nov 2026, 03:11
11,384
+11
2 Nov 2026, 02:31
11,373
+10
1 Nov 2026, 01:48
11,363
+9
31 Oct 2026, 01:27
11,354
+12
30 Oct 2026, 00:45
11,342
+14
29 Oct 2026, 02:30
11,328
+22
28 Oct 2026, 00:46
11,306
+6
27 Oct 2026, 02:11
11,300
+13
25 Oct 2026, 23:55
11,287
+14
24 Oct 2026, 20:39
11,273
+7
23 Oct 2026, 23:50
11,266
-4
23 Oct 2026, 03:09
11,270
-8
22 Oct 2026, 00:56
11,278
-6
20 Oct 2026, 19:30
11,284
-1
19 Oct 2026, 19:55
11,285
-5
18 Oct 2026, 21:17
11,290
first reading
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.54%
avg views ÷ 11,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
290
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
107 (30 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
10,438
Reactions total
434
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 10:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,650
Videos
≈1,250
Links
≈2,470
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 22s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,254 reactions across 106 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
255
20.3%
👍
193
15.4%
🔥
184
14.7%
🤝
161
12.8%
💯
155
12.4%
👨💻
103
8.21%
🙏
64
5.10%
❤🔥
44
3.51%
😍
31
2.47%
👌
14
1.12%
🏆
13
1.04%
👏
9
0.718%
✍
8
0.638%
🤗
7
0.558%
⚡
4
0.319%
🎉
4
0.319%
🥰
2
0.159%
🕊
1
0.08%
🤩
1
0.08%
🫡
1
0.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,254 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.935%
1 of 107 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
234
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
255
over 105 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxAoLcn
1
11 November 2026
11 November 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (16.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Покупайте, потом всё узаконите».
С этой фразы часто начинаются истории, с которыми ко мне приходят инвесторы. И начинающие, и опытные.
⠀
Поверили продавцу или риелтору. Купили.
А когда начали разбираться — оказалось, что сделать задуманное нельзя.
Деньги уже вложены, а что дальше делать с объектом — непонятно 🤷
⠀
Проверить продавца и право собственности — ещё не значит проверить недвижимость: риски и потенциал.
Важн…
«У МЕНЯ УЖЕ ЕСТЬ ПОДРЯДЧИК. ЗАЧЕМ МНЕ В ЭТОМ РАЗБИРАТЬСЯ?»
Чтобы понимать, что именно он вам делает.
Не проверять за проектировщиком каждую линию. Не учиться чертить вместо него.
А различать:
▫️проект и тех.план;
▫️подготовку документа и сопровождение;
▫️обещание подать заявление и обязательство выполнить конкретный объём работ.
На эфире говорила: заказчик иногда покупает частичную услугу, а думает, что оплати…
Получила заказ прямо во время обучения. А инвестор нашёл исполнителя для своего объекта.
Вот так два запроса встретились на моем курсе — и теперь люди вместе ведут проект.
⠀
Расскажу, как это произошло.
⠀
На обучение пришёл инвестор, собственник коммерческой недвижимости. Хотел разобраться в перепланировках: что можно делать с объектами, как привести документы в порядок, снизить риски и грамотно ставить задачи подр…
Когда я приехала в Москву, меня здесь почти никто не знал. А 10 ноября коллеги в четвёртый раз избрали меня в правление Гильдии риэлторов Москвы.
Для меня это очень тёплая и важная новость.
Профессиональный опыт к моменту переезда в 2022 у меня уже был большой.
Но в новом городе нужно было знакомиться, выстраивать отношения, осваиваться на местном рынке.
ГРМ очень помогла мне в этом. Поэтому сейчас особенно приятн…
Клиент приносит объект за 60–100 миллионов. Комиссия может быть миллион +. А вы не берётесь.
Не потому, что не хотите заработать. Просто непонятно, что с этим объектом можно сделать и за что вы готовы отвечать.
Можно ли узаконить изменения? Разделить помещение? Перевести в жильё? Сколько это займёт и во что обойдётся?
Обещать клиенту наугад не хочется. И правильно.
Друзья, я запускаю новую рубрику. Хочу разбирать…
erid: 2VtzqxAoLcn
28-29 ноября проходит 10-ый Private Money Forum в Москве — крупнейший форум по частным инвестициям ⚡️️️️️️️
В этом году он посвящён вопросам, которые сейчас задают себе все инвесторы:
❔где держать деньги, когда под давлением и биржа, и недвижимость, и бизнес?
❔из каких активов пора выходить?
❔а какие стоит держать и не поддаваться панике?
Я выступлю на форуме со своей экспертной темой:
«Юридичес…
КЛИЕНТООРИЕНТИРОВАННОСТЬ — ЭТО КОГДА МОЖНО НЕ ПЛАТИТЬ?
На днях у нас произошла неприятная ситуация. Хочу поделиться и спросить, как вы поступаете в таких случаях.
К нам обратилась за консультацией кадастровый инженер по крупному административному зданию. Она взялась готовить технический план, но столкнулась с приостановками Росреестра.
Начали разбираться. Вопросы оказались и по земле, и по параметрам здания, и по …
5 объектов, которые я бы не купила под обещание «потом всё узаконим»
«Светлана, цена хорошая. Может, сначала купить, а потом разобраться с документами?»
Вот этого я и не советую делать.
Скидку вы видите сразу. А сколько будет стоить ошибка — узнаете после покупки.
Особенно когда продают красивый сценарий: здесь сделаете студии, тут откроете хостел, этот этаж оформите и будете получать доход.
Только сначала прове…
Плюс 30 миллионов к стоимости здания. Новый этаж для этого строить не пришлось — он уже был. Только в документах его не существовало.
Друзья, хочу показать вам один из наших кейсов. Очень люблю такие задачи: когда разбираешься с документами и видишь, сколько собственник теряет из-за неоформленных изменений.
К нам обратился владелец коммерческого здания. По ЕГРН — 600 м². По факту — около 1200 м².
Откуда разница?
…
ПОМНИТЕ ПОМЕЩЕНИЕ 250 М²? Я БЫ НАЧАЛА СО СМЕШАННОЙ СТРАТЕГИИ
Предлагала вам выбрать:
1 — разделить на небольшие коммерческие помещения;
2 — рассмотреть перевод и раздел на квартиры;
3 — сначала разделить, а дальше работать с частями по-разному.
На эфире объяснила, почему в этой ситуации мне интереснее третий вариант.
У владелицы есть конкретная цель: выйти из объекта и забрать деньги в течение года.
Значит, нуж…
Маркетплейс отказался брать помещение в аренду. Причина — неузаконенная перепланировка.
Вчера общалась со знакомым инвестором. У него нежилое помещение, и на него претендовал крупный арендатор — маркетплейс.
Аренда на долгий срок, стабильный доход, всё сложилось.
Но на этапе юридической проверки сделка сорвалась: в помещении перепланировка, которой нет в документах.
Крупные игроки не работают с «проблемными» объект…
💯4❤3✍2👍1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @pereplanirovkagonenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Налоговая школа Вадима Баранча @agentschool · 24,726 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
Лемана ПРО: сообщество профессионалов @lemanapro_biznes · 82,304 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 August 2026
Советы нотариуса @n_advices · 33,475 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
Bezdelka - Безопасные сделки с недвижимостью, канал юриста Олеси БухтояровойR @bezdelkaBuh · 31,726 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Клышин Алексей юрист по недвижимости @klyshin_A · 66,727 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Перепланировка по закону” (@pereplanirovkagonenko), 11,403 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pereplanirovkagonenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.