Крипта через призму фундаментальных процессов в мировой экономике, важные новости, психология рынка и немного юмора.
Обратная связь @bitkogan_official_bot
Реклама @bitkogan_ads
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673b65d96afad41667c98f2d®istryTyp
Created
30 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,346–41,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:15
41,356
-19
11 Aug 2026, 15:03
41,375
-14
10 Aug 2026, 11:44
41,389
-9
9 Aug 2026, 12:33
41,398
-13
8 Aug 2026, 10:21
41,411
-6
7 Aug 2026, 12:33
41,417
-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:15
41,423
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:52
41,423
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 41,356 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (9 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
154,760
Reactions total
2,167
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,010
Videos
≈134
Links
≈2,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,959 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,542
52.1%
❤
697
23.6%
🔥
286
9.67%
🤔
114
3.85%
💯
55
1.86%
👏
43
1.45%
😁
31
1.05%
🥴
24
0.811%
🎃
23
0.777%
👌
21
0.71%
🤝
20
0.676%
🎉
18
0.608%
💊
15
0.507%
✍
13
0.439%
🍌
11
0.372%
😐
8
0.27%
🤨
8
0.27%
🤷♂
6
0.203%
👀
4
0.135%
😴
4
0.135%
8 further kinds
16
0.541%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,959reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, мы решили немного изменить формат работы канала.
Вместо частых коротких публикаций мы сосредоточимся на материалах, которые требуют подробного разбора. Не каждая тема укладывается в несколько абзацев, и мы хотим давать ей столько внимания, сколько она заслуживает.
Параллельно мы готовим интенсив по крипте. Для нас это возможность собрать в единую систему тот подход к анализу крипторынка, который лежит в осн…
Когда опыт инвестора мешает в крипте
По нашим наблюдениям, ошибки на этом рынке часто совершают опытные инвесторы в фондовый рынок.
➡️ Проблема в том, что они продолжают применять привычные шаблоны там, где те не работают.
Альткоин воспринимается как акция второго эшелона
Капитализация — как оценка бизнеса
Покупка токена — как приобретение доли в компании.
Аналогии кажутся естественными, но приводят к убыткам. Дл…
Банк России подготовил проект правил маржинальной торговли криптовалютой
Покупать крипту с плечом смогут как квалифицированные, так и неквалифицированные инвесторы. Правда, для последних ЦБ введет ограничения на размер и условия таких сделок.
💬Регулятор делает еще один шаг к легализации рынка, правила должны вступить в силу с 1 сентября.
#крипто 🔥HOTLINE в MAX
Завтра в 21 по Москве - ставка ФРС.
Лично мы в этот момент будем находиться настолько далеко от рынка, что даже крики хейтеров трейдеров с плечом не долетят. Поэтому не занимаем новых позиций, но Вам попытаемся дать несколько сценариев.
1️⃣
Умные люди из уважаемых организаций говорят, что базовый сценарий - ставка останется неизменной. Обязательно ли это хорошо? Нет. После объявления ставки трейдеры будут с микрос…
Почему рынок падает сегодня
❗️Обратите внимание на красный кружочек на графике. Это - серия спотовых продаж, которая стала одним из предвестников сегодняшнего движения вниз. За ней последовал некоторый перегрев рынка по фандингу. Нас в рынке не было, а жаль - был отличный период для входа в шорты.
✔️Теханализ говорит - скоро отскок, хотя бы локальный. Уровень Фибоначчи же рядом. Перепроданность на часовиках же набл…
Эфириум против Solana
❓Вы видели, наверное, посты в духе "Монета XXX - убийца Эфириума"?
◽️И каждый раз этот убийца мажет, а большая часть из них потом лежит на дне в Брюгге. Сегодня мы разберемся, почему так происходит, на примере самого знаменитого конкурента Эфириума - Solana.
Чего может хотеть L1-монета, чтобы стать ценной и богатой:
1️⃣Размещать децентрализованный капитал (DeFi)
2️⃣Быть площадкой для RWA (то…
Подведём итоги интерактива!
Наш победитель 🏆🎉🏆 @dzmtryo со ставкой на 67 200.
Он может прислать в комментарии к этому посту монету на разбор, и мы обязательно о ней напишем на днях!
А пока сделаем недельный перерыв в интерактиве - контент-план уже полнится монетами!
Друзья, мы вернулись из мира градусников в мир крипты и пытаемся сориентироваться, что проиcходит.
1️⃣Хедж-фонды неделю назад начали активно наращивать лонги по нефти - впервые за два месяца. Это может говорить об ожиданиях эскалации в Иране.
2️⃣Демократы в рамках CLARITY продавили Трампа больше не брить хомячков. Это может говорить о том, что он найдет более хитрый способ извлекать профит из статуса Криптопрезиден…
Введение. В чем смысл существования Эфириума, и зачем его покупать вместе с Биткоином?
✔️Когда-то Сатоши Накамото показал миру, что деньги можно создать и без центробанка. 19-летний Виталик Бутерин пошел дальше и доказал - мы можем воссоздать целую финансовую инфраструктуру без центробанка. Центром этой системы стал Эфириум. Биткоин им стать не захотел - он намеренно ограничен в целях безопасности.
▪️Эфириум же поз…
Серия “Эфириум”.
Победитель нашего интерактива выбрал для анализа монету Ethereum (ETH).
Монета, о которой можно написать целую книгу - и будет мало. Поэтому несколько рабочих дней мы будем разбирать (без ущерба для других тем):
1️⃣Что такое Эфириум
2️⃣Почему он занимает такое важное место среди конкурентов
3️⃣Каковы драйверы роста актива и его риски
4️⃣Как ведет себя монета с точки зрения данных CoinGlass и техан…
Подведём итоги интерактива!
Наш победитель 🏆🎉🏆
@Bakaleksey со ставкой на 65 500.
Он может прислать в комментарии к этому посту монету на разбор, и мы обязательно о ней напишем завтра!
А теперь - Ваши ставки на следующую неделю - где будет Биткоин 22 июля в 18:30 по Москве?
Цифры без обоснований принимать не будем, прием заявок закроем в полночь.
ПРИЕМ ЗАЯВОК ЗАКРЫТ
Ловушки CLARITY
❗️❗️❗️В пятницу должно состояться слушание CLARITY Act - закона, который может перевернуть игру задать тон крипторегулированию в США. В том числе, от него ожидают условий для притока институциональных средств в крипту.
Мы посвятим несколько постов подготовке к ключевым этапам в принятии CLARITY и их последствиям.
“Бычий” сценарий тут выглядит базовым: CLARITY движется к успеху, лонги движутся к при…
👍89❤28🔥16✍6😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptokogan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 364,774 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cryptokogan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dzmtryo named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
bitkogan @bitkogan · 261,595 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Профита нет. А если найду? @profitanet · 203,436 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoKogan” (@cryptokogan), 41,356 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptokogan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.