Channel
@TrueCaller_Z
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,076,923subscribers
-14,543 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001220111609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TrueCaller_Z |
| Created | 20 June 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TrueCaller_Z |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 2,076,923 | -1,402 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 2,078,325 | -1,652 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 2,079,977 | -7,504 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 2,087,481 | -1,251 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 2,088,732 | -1,150 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 2,089,882 | -1,009 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 2,090,891 | -575 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 2,091,466 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 2,091,466 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 20 June 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3,458 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (20 June 2019 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 67,500 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /1971110 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC | 1210 minutes – 11 hours old | 67,500 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 24,200 → 3.0 hours: 39,600 → 6.0 hours: 53,800still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.1 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2019 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Big Loot Dropped Just ₹9🔥 Order Now👇👇: 👉 https://t.me/+gLgarDol8a5kMmZl 👉 https://t.me/+gLgarDol8a5kMmZl #ad
📢 Introducing Our Truecaller Bot! 🔍 Ever wondered who's behind an unknown number? Now, with our Truecaller Bot, you can easily find out! Simply send a phone number to the bot, and you'll instantly receive details like: - 📛 Name - 📞 Carrier - 🌍 Region It’s fast, secure, and super easy to use. Whether you’re dealing with spam calls or just curious, our bot has you covered! 👉 Try it out now! @TrueCalleRobot Stay tu…
Telegram is adding a new way to send gifts to your friends! Using "Telegram stars," you'll be able to buy virtual gifts, which are represented as stickers. Recipients can choose to display the gift in their profile or exchange it for stars (minus a 15% commission). Some gifts will be limited-edition, with only a certain number available on the platform.
🚨 Attention, Truecaller Fans! 🚨 I'm moving all the latest updates, exciting features, and special announcements to my new channel 👉 @true_caller 👈. Make sure you join now to stay in the loop with everything! All future updates will be shared exclusively there. Don’t miss out! 🙌 Tap the link and follow us to keep receiving the info you need, when you need it. Looking forward to seeing you there!
A major security breach at BingX exchange has resulted in the theft of over $43 million worth of crypto assets. The hackers targeted hot wallets and drained Ethereum, BNB, and MATIC tokens, impacting a wide range of networks. UnlimBotX has suspended withdrawals and is working to restore access and provide compensation to affected users.
Video, posted without a caption
😬
Hey everyone! 👋 join our second channel here: @true_caller for more cool updates. we’ve noticed some users from Iran are having trouble joining directly. If that’s you, just use this link to join in: click here
Telegram has extended account lifespans to two years, but session durations remain capped at one year.
💬 We Want to Hear from You! 💬 Hey everyone! We're always looking to improve and make our bot even more useful for you. If you have any suggestions, opinions, or ideas for new features you'd like to see, we'd love to hear them! ⚙ How can we make the bot better? - New features you want? - Any improvements to existing functions? - Something you think could make the bot more user-friendly? Drop your thoughts in the co…
Video, posted without a caption
PAVEL DUROV FACES 20 YEARS IN PRISON IN FRANCE Telegram founder Pavel Durov is set to appear before a judge on Saturday evening, facing multiple charges, including terrorism, drug trafficking, fraud, money laundering, and child abuse content. French media report that Durov, a dual French and Russian citizen, could face up to 20 years in prison. His arrest is attributed to Telegram's lack of content moderation and …
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @TrueCaller_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
would you guys like me to post things other than the bot?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2019 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TrueCaller_Z named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TrueCaller” (@TrueCaller_Z), 2,076,923 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrueCaller_Z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.