Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -38,880. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,046,754–2,097,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 11:38
2,052,586
-2,430
19 Sept 2026, 12:20
2,055,016
-235
17 Sept 2026, 01:00
2,055,251
-169
14 Sept 2026, 23:21
2,055,420
-62
13 Sept 2026, 11:00
2,055,482
-820
11 Sept 2026, 13:57
2,056,302
-897
9 Sept 2026, 01:00
2,057,199
-1,570
5 Sept 2026, 14:00
2,058,769
-583
3 Sept 2026, 12:36
2,059,352
-230
2 Sept 2026, 03:18
2,059,582
-470
1 Sept 2026, 04:14
2,060,052
-556
31 Aug 2026, 05:48
2,060,608
-694
30 Aug 2026, 02:19
2,061,302
-420
29 Aug 2026, 00:48
2,061,722
-448
28 Aug 2026, 03:25
2,062,170
-217
27 Aug 2026, 05:47
2,062,387
-317
26 Aug 2026, 03:07
2,062,704
-921
25 Aug 2026, 01:15
2,063,625
-1,703
23 Aug 2026, 14:58
2,065,328
-1,457
22 Aug 2026, 03:05
2,066,785
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 20 June 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3,547 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 35 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
3
Links
19
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
1 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 24,200 → 3.0 hours: 39,600 → 6.0 hours: 53,800still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
2.1 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Advertising
Ad load
2.86%
1 of 35 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
67,500
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,000,000
over 33 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2019 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
📢 Introducing Our Truecaller Bot! 🔍
Ever wondered who's behind an unknown number? Now, with our Truecaller Bot, you can easily find out! Simply send a phone number to the bot, and you'll instantly receive details like:
- 📛 Name
- 📞 Carrier
- 🌍 Region
It’s fast, secure, and super easy to use. Whether you’re dealing with spam calls or just curious, our bot has you covered!
👉 Try it out now! @TrueCalleRobot
Stay tu…
Telegram is adding a new way to send gifts to your friends! Using "Telegram stars," you'll be able to buy virtual gifts, which are represented as stickers. Recipients can choose to display the gift in their profile or exchange it for stars (minus a 15% commission).
Some gifts will be limited-edition, with only a certain number available on the platform.
🚨 Attention, Truecaller Fans! 🚨
I'm moving all the latest updates, exciting features, and special announcements to my new channel 👉 @true_caller 👈.
Make sure you join now to stay in the loop with everything! All future updates will be shared exclusively there. Don’t miss out! 🙌
Tap the link and follow us to keep receiving the info you need, when you need it. Looking forward to seeing you there!
A major security breach at BingX exchange has resulted in the theft of over $43 million worth of crypto assets. The hackers targeted hot wallets and drained Ethereum, BNB, and MATIC tokens, impacting a wide range of networks. UnlimBotX has suspended withdrawals and is working to restore access and provide compensation to affected users.
Hey everyone! 👋
join our second channel here: @true_caller for more cool updates.
we’ve noticed some users from Iran are having trouble joining directly. If that’s you, just use this link to join in: click here
💬 We Want to Hear from You! 💬
Hey everyone! We're always looking to improve and make our bot even more useful for you. If you have any suggestions, opinions, or ideas for new features you'd like to see, we'd love to hear them!
⚙ How can we make the bot better?
- New features you want?
- Any improvements to existing functions?
- Something you think could make the bot more user-friendly?
Drop your thoughts in the co…
PAVEL DUROV FACES 20 YEARS IN PRISON IN FRANCE
Telegram founder Pavel Durov is set to appear before a judge on Saturday evening, facing multiple charges, including terrorism, drug trafficking, fraud, money laundering, and child abuse content.
French media report that Durov, a dual French and Russian citizen, could face up to 20 years in prison.
His arrest is attributed to Telegram's lack of content moderation and …
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @TrueCaller_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
would you guys like me to post things other than the bot?
yes75%
no25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2019 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TrueCaller_Z named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@truecallerobot named in 24 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Sarkari Result ® SarkariResult.Com Official @SarkariResult2012 · 1,542,944#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ninjagram @tele_ninja · 249,556 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 August 2026
Crypto in Plain English @Crypto_in_Plain_English · 32,885 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
Random Chatss @RandomChatsss · 79,499 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 26 August 2026
🔥EzPzBot | EzCinema @EzCinema · 205,649 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
Telegram Tips @telegramtips · 10,963,130 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 August 2026
Coolest Tech @Coolesttech · 218,640 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 9 here — alongside 8 others — read 9 September 2026
Prashant Dhawan Sir Official✅ @DhawanSir · 140,135 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Techinsider Ashish @techinsiderAs · 260,935 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 17 August 2026
spellwithdina @spellwithdinachannel · 45,928 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 30 August 2026
Photify AI Channel @photifyai · 61,789 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 21 August 2026
ChatGPT Tips, Prompts & AI Tools @GPT_ChatGPT_AI_Tools · 60,676 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
Neural Pony @neuralpony · 195,187 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
iPapkorn @iPapkorn · 1,881,707 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 August 2026
Educational Bhaiya @EducationalBhaiyaG · 47,197 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 28 August 2026
Discover • Tech News @perplexity · 1,443,494 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Mazi naukri (Jobs update )™ @mazinaukrii · 22,589 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 20 September 2026
Udemy Free Courses @Udemy_Free_Courses4 · 248,371 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 10 August 2026
CADETS DEFENCE ACADEMY @cadetsdefenceacademyofficial · 28,692 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
Chandan Logics @ChandanLogics · 42,709 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 August 2026
Give All the Heart @givealltheheart · 21,184 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 September 2026
Coingraph | News @CoingraphNews · 751,708 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 August 2026
Reasoning by Jitin Sir PW @JitinSirPW · 44,232 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 29 August 2026
TM Careers ( ఉద్యోగాలు ) @tmcareers · 25,948 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 13 September 2026
NEET JEE CBSE BIOLOGY CHEMISTRY @neet_jee_cbse_biology_chemistry · 36,717 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TrueCaller” (@TrueCaller_Z), 2,052,586 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrueCaller_Z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.