Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 63 days, net -2,926. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,868–64,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 03:19
61,307
-194
4 Oct 2026, 15:16
61,501
-288
26 Sept 2026, 11:02
61,789
-444
17 Sept 2026, 11:59
62,233
-57
15 Sept 2026, 10:18
62,290
-16
13 Sept 2026, 18:17
62,306
-76
11 Sept 2026, 21:37
62,382
-97
9 Sept 2026, 09:59
62,479
-138
6 Sept 2026, 00:16
62,617
-73
3 Sept 2026, 21:00
62,690
-93
2 Sept 2026, 12:03
62,783
-95
1 Sept 2026, 11:28
62,878
-26
31 Aug 2026, 14:13
62,904
-32
30 Aug 2026, 14:28
62,936
-20
29 Aug 2026, 16:23
62,956
-54
28 Aug 2026, 14:36
63,010
-44
27 Aug 2026, 12:53
63,054
-21
26 Aug 2026, 16:03
63,075
-32
25 Aug 2026, 19:02
63,107
-28
24 Aug 2026, 22:25
63,135
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 127 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 61,307 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,540
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.349%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held
22 (16 June 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total
39,210
Reactions total
137
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
697 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
420
60.3%
🔥
95
13.6%
⚡
74
10.6%
🎉
51
7.32%
💯
14
2.01%
🙏
14
2.01%
🤯
11
1.58%
🥰
11
1.58%
😱
7
1.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What are you made of? ✨ Turn yourself into a transparent glass version of you — and show us what’s inside. Fill your glass body with whatever represents what fills you 🫧
Post your arts with #WhatFillsMe 🎲 10 winners will be randomly chosen from those who successfully recreate the theme and receive 💎 20 Supreme Tokens each. Results on October, 12 🌚
Show us what’s inside with @PhotifyAIOfficialBot ✨
What if you wandered into a garden… and never found your way out? For this contest, lose yourself in the flowers. Сreate a dreamy floral world where you almost become part of it 🌸
Post your arts with #LostInTheFlowers 🎲 10 winners will be randomly chosen from those who successfully recreate the theme and receive 💎 20 Supreme Tokens each. Results on October, 5 🌚
Results above made with Premium model 🐩
Get beautiful…
🚀 Photify AI has a new Telegram home!
Create your AI photos and videos here 👉 @PhotifyAIOfficialBot
Tap Start to get going. Your existing credits and subscriptions are saved ✨
Remember those blurred photo prompts we shared recently for inspiration? Now it’s your turn to take the idea further 📸
This week’s theme is #BLURRED. You’re welcome to use the prompts we shared earlier as your starting point — but your final image must introduce at least one new detail or creative change 💛
🎲 10 random winners → 10 Premium Tokens each on Monday. Post your image in the Photify AI Chat using hashtag #…
💚 Android gang, Photify AI is officially back 💚
Thank you so much for your patience while Photify AI was away from the Google Play Store. We know the wait wasn’t fun, and we really appreciate everyone who stuck with us. So go update, open Photify AI, and get back to creating. Your next masterpiece / glow-up / completely unhinged AI creation isn’t going to make itself 📸
➡️Download Photify AI ⬅️
Summer is almost over, vacations are ending, and unfortunately… it’s time to pack ✈️
This week’s photoshoot is #TooMuchLuggage 🧳 you're heading home with. Create your shot and share it in the Photify AI Chat using the hashtag 📸
🎲 10 random winners receive 10 Premium Tokens each on 31st of August!
Vacation season may be ending, beach pictures never end at @PhotifyAIOfficialBot ✈️
This week's photoshoot is iconic food: turn groceries and desserts into your next fashion set. The assignment is simple: make it look less like lunch and more like a magazine spread 📌
Create your shot in Photify AI and share it in the Photify AI Chat using #TooTastyToEat 📸
🎲 10 random winners receive 10 Premium Tokens each on Monday!
Find your fav aisle in
@PhotifyOfficialBot 🍒
❤24🔥5⚡3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @photifyai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SwaperFace: Deepfake, photo editor @Swaperface_1 · 24,633 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 12 here — alongside 11 others — read 14 September 2026
Techno-Tricksters @technotricksters · 47,869 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 26 August 2026
Neural Pony @neuralpony · 192,704 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Photify AI Channel” (@photifyai), 61,307 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/photifyai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.