Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10,717. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,765,652–5,779,866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 20:45
5,767,292
-9,190
11 Aug 2026, 17:51
5,776,482
-111
10 Aug 2026, 17:36
5,776,593
-461
9 Aug 2026, 18:41
5,777,054
-651
8 Aug 2026, 18:01
5,777,705
-397
7 Aug 2026, 18:20
5,778,102
-124
6 Aug 2026, 15:11
5,778,226
+217
6 Aug 2026, 09:01
5,778,009
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 April 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 1,737 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.73%
avg views ÷ 5,767,292 subscribers
Avg views / post
215,000
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
19 (26 April 2020 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
215,000
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
1 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 78,559 interp. → 3.0 hours: 135,000 → 6.0 hours: 188,000still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
1.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Advertising
Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
215,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
11,400,000
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2020 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🔥 Introducing the Truecaller Bot on Telegram! 📞
Ever wondered who's calling or need information about a phone number? Now you can find out easily! Just send a phone number to our Truecaller Bot and get details like:
- Name
- Carrier
- Region
- And more!
🔍 How it works:
1⃣ Send a number to the bot.
2⃣ Get instant information.
It's fast, simple, and FREE! Try it now. ⚡️
[Click here to start using the bot!] 🤖
🚀 New Truecaller Bot is Live!
We’ve launched a fresh and improved bot for you all — check it out now! 🔥
👉 Use the new bot here: @TrueCalleRobot
Just send any ph️on️e nu️m️b️er to the bot and get instant det️️ai️️ls like na️️m️️e, r️️egi️️on, a️️n️️d m️️ore! 📱
Fast, simple, and reliable — as always. ✅
Share it with your friends and enjoy the same powerful features with a smooth new experience!
#TruecallerBot #Tel…
📢 Hello Truecallers, ATTENTION!
🏪 Want to showcase your product or service to a large audience? Our channel is your perfect advertising platform!
📈 We provide advertisements for your product or service in this channel.
⚡️ You can also promote your Telegram channel here and boost your followers.
📬 If you're interested in promoting your services or product, message me at @OTPLess.
✨ To all our Indian friends, Happy Diwali! ✨
May this festival of lights bring joy, prosperity, and warmth to you and your loved ones. Celebrate with light and laughter, and thank you for being part of our community! 🪔🌟
Wishing you a sparkling Diwali 💥
📢 Introducing Our Truecaller Bot! 🔍
Ever wondered who's behind an unknown number? Now, with our Truecaller Bot, you can easily find out! Simply send a phone number to the bot, and you'll instantly receive details like:
- 📛 Name
- 📞 Carrier
- 🌍 Region
It’s fast, secure, and super easy to use. Whether you’re dealing with spam calls or just curious, our bot has you covered!
👉 Try it out now! @TrueCalleRobot
Stay tu…
It's official ❤️🩹
Ratan Tata’s passing marks the end of an era. A visionary leader, philanthropist, and a beacon of integrity, he transformed Indian industry while prioritizing humanity and ethics. His legacy of compassion and innovation will continue to inspire generations. Rest in peace, Ratan Tata.❤️🩹
Telegram is adding a new way to send gifts to your friends! Using "Telegram stars," you'll be able to buy virtual gifts, which are represented as stickers. Recipients can choose to display the gift in their profile or exchange it for stars (minus a 15% commission).
Some gifts will be limited-edition, with only a certain number available on the platform.
📞 Bot to get information about a phone number.
Get results with lighting fast speed ⚡️
🤖 Use Bot: @TrueCalleRobot
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @true_caller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 224,888 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@true_caller named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@truecallerobot named in 18 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TrueCaller” (@true_caller), 5,767,292 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/true_caller.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.