Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

أحاديث الرسول ﷺ

@TheIslamicProphet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56,006subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001787356250
TypeChannel
Username@TheIslamicProphet
Descriptionقناة لـ نشر أحاديث انتسبت الى صاحب الخلق العظيم محمد ﷺ. اذاعة القرآن الكريم: @BBeBB قناة لـ نشر آيات اللّٰهُ الكريمة مع تفسير للآية: @KKK9K قناة لـ نشر آيات اللّٰهُ الكريمة باللغة الانجليزية: @TheEnglishQuran ~ 🇸🇦
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheIslamicProphet

Growth

56,00356,07756,0406 August 2026 — 56,063 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,064 subscribers7 August 2026 — 56,077 subscribers8 August 2026 — 56,061 subscribers9 August 2026 — 56,039 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56,033 subscribers11 August 2026 — 56,003 subscribers12 August 2026 — 56,006 subscribers56,0066 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,992–56,088 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:5356,006+3
11 Aug 2026, 12:3856,003-30
10 Aug 2026, 15:2156,033-6
9 Aug 2026, 14:1556,039-22
8 Aug 2026, 16:0156,061-16
7 Aug 2026, 13:2556,077+13
6 Aug 2026, 11:0056,064+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:1856,063first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.13%
avg views ÷ 56,006 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
85
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held85 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total101,397
Reactions total2,884
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
13,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,454 reactions across 72 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,454100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,884reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC495 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إذا استيقظَ أحدُكُم منَ اللَّيلِ فلا يُدخِلْ يدَهُ في الإناءِ ، حتَّى يُفْرِغَ عليها مرَّتينِ أو ثلاثًا فإنَّهُ لا يدري أينَ باتَت يدُهُ ) - الراوي: أبو هريرة - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (24)

25

12 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC609 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إذا أحبَّ اللَّهُ عبدًا نادى جبريلَ: إنِّي قد أَحببتُ فلانًا فأحبَّهُ، قالَ: فيُنادي في السَّماءِ، ثمَّ تنزلُ لَهُ المحبَّةُ في أَهْلِ الأرضِ، فذلِكَ قولُ اللَّهِ: إِنَّ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ سَيَجْعَلُ لَهُمُ الرَّحْمَنُ وُدًّا ، وإذا أَبغضَ اللَّهُ عبدًا نادى جبريلَ: إنِّي أَبغضتُ فلانًا، فيُنادي في السَّماءِ ثمَّ تُنزَلُ لَهُ البَغضاءُ في الأرضِ - الراوي: أبو هريرة - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المص

35

12 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC762 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إذا أقبلَ اللَّيلُ ، وأَدبرَ النَّهارُ ، وغابَتِ الشَّمسُ ، فقد أفطَرتَ - الراوي: عمر بن الخطاب - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (698)

28

12 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC910 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لا يُجزِئُ ولدٌ والدًا إلَّا أن يجدَه مملوكًا فيشتريَه فيعتقَهُ - الراوي: أبو هريرة - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (1906)

27

12 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC958 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لاَ يحلُّ الْكذبُ إلاَّ في ثلاثٍ يحدِّثُ الرَّجلُ امرأتَهُ ليرضيَها والْكذبُ في الحربِ والْكذبُ ليصلحَ بينَ النَّاسِ - الراوي: أسماء بنت يزيد أم سلمة الأنصارية - حكم الحديث: صحيح دون قوله: "ليرضيها" • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (1939)

36

12 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC≈1,020 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

سُئلَ النَّبيُّ صلَّى اللَّهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ : أيُّ الأعمالِ أفضلُ ؟ قالَ الصَّلاةُ لأوَّلِ وقتِها - الراوي: أم فروة بنت أبي قحافة - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (170)

39

12 Aug 2026, 00:56 UTC≈1,030 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026

أُمِرتُ أن أقاتلَ النَّاسَ حتَّى يقولوا لا إلَهَ إلَّا اللَّهُ فإذا قالوها عصموا منِّي دماءَهم وأموالَهم إلَّا بحقِّها وحسابُهم على اللَّهِ ثمَّ قرأَ إِنَّمَا أَنْتَ مُذَكِّرٌ لَسْتَ عَلَيْهِمْ بِمُصَيْطِرٍ - الراوي: جابر بن عبدالله - حكم الحديث: صحيح متواتر • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (3341)

35

11 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,070 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

عن وترِ رسولِ اللهِ صلَّى اللهُ عليهِ وسلَّم فقالت من كلِّ الليلِ قد أوترَ : أوَّلُه ، وأوسطُه ، وآخرُه ، فانتهى وترُه حين مات في وجهِ السَّحرِ - الراوي: عائشة أم المؤمنين - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (456)

28

11 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈1,160 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

إذا أتيتُم الغائطَ فلا تستقبِلوا القبلةَ بغائطٍ ولا بولٍ ولاتستدبِروها ولَكن شرِّقوا أو غرِّبوا - الراوي: أبو أيوب الأنصاري - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (8)

28

11 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,300 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الشُّؤمُ في ثلاثةٍ في المرأةِ والمسْكنِ والدَّابَّةِ - الراوي: عبدالله بن عمر - حكم الحديث: صحيح بزيادة: "إن كان الشؤم في شيء ففي" • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (2824)

30

11 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,390 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

أنَّهُ رأى رسولَ اللهِ صلَّى اللَّهُ عليهِ وسلَّمَ يصلِّي في بيتِ أمِّ سلمةَ مشتملًا في ثوبٍ واحدٍ - الراوي: عمر بن أبي سلمة - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (339)

33

11 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,420 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

أنَّ النَّبيَّ صلَّى اللَّهُ علَيهِ وسلَّمَ أبصرَ حَسنًا وحُسَيْنًا فقالَ : اللَّهمَّ إنِّي أحبُّهما فأحبَّهما - الراوي: البراء بن عازب - حكم الحديث: صحيح • المصدر: صحيح الترمذي (3782)

41

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @TheIslamicProphet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,628 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أحاديث الرسول ﷺ” (@TheIslamicProphet), 56,006 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheIslamicProphet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.