Channel
@albhji
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,582subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001869096466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @albhji |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/albhji |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,582 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 1,584 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,588 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 1,592 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 1,589 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 1,588 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 1,592 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 1,594 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 1,594 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 88.9% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 February 2026 to 20 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بحث مهم في اختلاف المطالع عند الحنفية و الرد على من انكره مثل قاضيخان وغيره من المتأخرين الذين انكروا اختلاف المطالع عند الحنفية البحث نقل قول ابي حنيفة وابي يوسف ومحمد في اثبات اختلاف المطالع
❤4🔥1
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
قال ابن سحمان والذي يظهر لي والله اعلم : انها لا تقوم الحجة إلا بمن يحسن إقامتها واما من لايحسن إقامتها كالجهال فإنه لا تقوم به الحجة قلت : فاشترط مع قيام الحجة وهي البلوغ ان يقيمها له معين يفهمه مراد النص من بلوغها وهذا الكلام يعتقده ابن سحمان ولا يشرح فيه كلام غيره وهو كلام تأصيلي تقريري منهاج الحق لابن سحمان (٦٨)
❤3
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
ونحن نلزم من ينكر العذر على ابن تيمية فنقول ان المعتزلة مشركين بالإجماع لانكارهم المراتب الاربعة بالقدر ومع ذلك قال شيخ الإسلام : مع أن أحمد لم يكفر أعيان الجهمية ولا كل من قال إنه جهمي كفره ولا كل من وافق الجهمية في بعض بدعهم؛ بل صلى خلف الجهمية الذين دعوا إلى قولهم وامتحنوا الناس وعاقبوا من لم يوافقهم بالعقوبات الغليظة لم يكفرهم أحمد وأمثاله؛ بل كان يعتقد إيمانهم وإمامتهم؛ ويدعو لهم؛ ويرى الائتمام بهم في الصلوات خ…
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
عذر شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية لمن يعتقد ان شيخه يرزقه وينصره ويهديه او يعبد شيخه او يسجد له او يفضله على رسول الله تفضيلا مطلقاً وَأَهْلِ الدِّيوَانِ وَالْعَامَّةِ: خَارِجًا عَنْ الْهُدَى وَدِينِ الْحَقِّ الَّذِي بَعَثَ اللَّهُ بِهِ رَسُولَهُ لَا يُقِرُّ بِجَمِيعِ مَا أَخْبَرَ اللَّهُ بِهِ عَلَى لِسَانِ رَسُولِهِ؛ وَلَا يُحَرِّمُ مَا حَرَّمَهُ اللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُ؛ أَوْ يَدَيْنِ بِدِينِ يُخَالِفُ الدِّينَ الَّذِي بَعَثَ…
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
العذر بالجهل عند الحنفية ولا يطلق عليه لفظ الشرك مع وقوعه بالناقض ١- روَى الطَّحَاوِيُّ عَنْ أَبِي حَنِيفَةَ وَأَصْحَابِنَا: لَا يُخْرِجُ الرَّجُلَ مِنْ الْإِيمَانِ إلَّا جُحُودُ مَا أَدْخَلَهُ فِيهِ، ثُمَّ مَا تَيَقَّنَ أَنَّهُ رِدَّةٌ يُحْكَمُ بِهَا، وَمَا شَكَّ أَنَّهُ رِدَّةٌ لَا يُحْكَمُ بِهَا؛ إذْ الْإِسْلَامُ الثَّابِتُ لَا يَزُولُ بِشَكٍّ مَعَ أَنَّ الْإِسْلَامَ يَعْلُو، وَيَنْبَغِي لِلْعَالِمِ إذَا رُفِعَ إ…
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
لماذا لا تعذرون ساب الله لانه الكفر بالأصل
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
تقرير شيخ الإسلام مذهب العذر من كلام الإمام احمد في الجهمية المحضة وقال بل صلى خلفهم وأعتقد إيمانهم وإمامتهم فهل يكون عندكم الجهمي امام ومؤمن ؟
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
تقرير الشيخ ابن عثيمين لمذهب العذر بالجهل ونسبه لشيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية والمجدد محمد بن عبدالوهاب وفي كلامه فوائد ١- العذر في الدنيا وعدم إطلاق ابن تيمية للجهمية المحضة حكم بالكفر بل قال متأولون وقوله انتم عندي لستم بكفار ولو قلت بقولكم كافر ٢- كلام الشيخ محمد بن عبدالوهاب في احكام الدنيا كذلك ٣- بدعة من قال نكفر بالأصول ونعذر بالأصول
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
الشيخ ابن عثيمين : ولو كان مسلما يدين بدين الإسلام …. لكنه يأتي شركا اكبر لا يدري انه شرك اكبر فهذا نعامله معاملة المسلم
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
كلام الشيخ عبد الله بن صالح القصير عن الخوارج المعاصرون ووصفهم بالمتمردين بالمكر والحيل على الولاة !
❤1
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
من سمات الخوارج المعاصرين كلاب الناس تجويزهم للمظاهرات بالسعودية جواب الشيخ عبد الله بن صالح القصير
Signed محمد بن الحسن الشيباني
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @albhji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 923,255 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سَلَفيّون - أَبنَاء عَائِشَة 📚.” (@albhji), 1,582 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/albhji.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.