Channel
@llhistoryll
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
80subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266230196 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @llhistoryll |
| Description | Народно-политический, иногда недостоверно-исторический, местами юмористический канал, весь в рассуждениях и поиске зигзагов, параллелей и истины ... |
| Created | 21 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/llhistoryll |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 80 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 80 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 January 2024 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 26 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 44.4% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2024 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всегда интересовался древним Ираном и вероятно первой монотеистической религией зороастризмом. Так всё-таки как говорил Заратуштра? Кем ему приходится Митра и Иесус с Мухаммедом? Недавно вышло интересное видео на канале Записки на манжетах Платона с которым я рекомендую ознакомиться всем нам, дорогие любители /// и ⚡⚡⚡. Буду ждать продолжение ... https://youtu.be/cSkDgLVll1U?si=SFe1cykzqi6AhV7O
Намедни некоторые чиТатели задавали мне вопросы о понедельничном посте про дороги разочарований. Основной вопрос конечно извечно-русский: Кто виноват и что делать? Ответ на первый вопрос- дороги (аппаратно- административные) и дураки. При чем первый дурак походу это ваш покорный слуга! Ведь только дурак- идеалист может просто так, за свой счёт, больше десяти лет назад написать концепцию совершенствования законодател…
https://t.me/cliomechanics/1545 Вот люблю такие посты... Жалко только, что не все о бактериях 😅Не все ссылки успел прочитать, поэтому выложил сюда, на потом ...
А вот история ещё одной роковой бандитки https://t.me/facts_for_everyone/4054
Вот такое поздравление моим любимым русским женщинам получилось у меня сегодня. Дорогие девушки и мамы! В день восьмого марта Поздравлять мы Вас все станем (*Далее читать речитативом в стиле Винни-Пуха) 🐻🐼🐻❄️ Не смотря ни на что, пусть даже белыми стихами, а все потому что любим вас сильно и очень-очень! (*Далее читать ВЫСОКИМ штилем, аки Ломоносова и т.п.) Нашу матушку Россию Я конечно же поздравляю И чуть позже …
https://t.me/khokhlovAR/1146 Давно не писал, с небольшим опозданием пишу, но не мог не написать свое мнение про "революцию сверху". Вообще- то все революции происходят "сверху". Поскольку народными бывают только восстания и бунты. Революция должна созреть и прежде всего в сознании элит. Восстание декабристов это восстание части элит против элитных же устоев большинства. А статейка хорошая, правильная. Это они прав…
https://t.me/tass_agency/346812 Если кого-то и обвинять в геноциде армян, кроме турок, то стоит посмотреть в сторону Франции и Бритпнии, которык договорилась передать Армении все завоеванное РИ в первой мировой, а уж армяне на этих землях покуражились, чем и вызвали депортацию ...
Ну да, пожалуй Митра был самым близким к Христу https://t.me/RobVenOstBender/97322
Вот оно как, наконец нашел первоисточник!!! Многие думают, что Маркс это повторил за Гегелем, а оказывается за Фукидидом ! https://t.me/antiquus_philosophia/154
У нас канал исторический и поэтому тему 💤&// в🏒 мы разбираем после того как улеглись первые страсти и 895 шайба стала достоянием истории. Помимо совпадений, которые выявил РБК, я нашел несколько забавных 💤 и //, но давайте по порядку. Факт. Вячеслав Александрович Овечкин, русский- москвич, нападающий Вашингтонской столички забил свою рекордную 895 шайбу в ворота Ильи Игоревича Сорокина вратаря Нью - Йоркских островит…
🔥1
https://dzen.ru/a/XE2GmjZPHwCswcxW Во всемирный день историка размещаю ссылку на пост о древнейшем найденном капище.
👏1
Нашелся тут загзаг 💤⚡. Оказывается это просто ошибка перевода, а мы все думаем- где там медведица? Господа Подписчики, а какие Вы ошибки перевода знаете, которые повлекли подобные последствия? Победителю - приз! Какой? - смотрите в комментариях 😉
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @llhistoryll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@llhistoryll named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Паралелли и загзаги истории” (@llhistoryll), 80 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/llhistoryll.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.