Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,891–26,023 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 18:01
25,906
-31
19 Sept 2026, 17:55
25,937
+9
17 Sept 2026, 06:56
25,928
+7
15 Sept 2026, 08:00
25,921
-7
13 Sept 2026, 13:38
25,928
-15
11 Sept 2026, 17:00
25,943
-16
9 Sept 2026, 04:21
25,959
-13
5 Sept 2026, 17:20
25,972
-5
3 Sept 2026, 15:01
25,977
-6
2 Sept 2026, 07:03
25,983
-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:38
25,987
-9
31 Aug 2026, 08:53
25,996
+5
30 Aug 2026, 05:54
25,991
-6
29 Aug 2026, 05:34
25,997
+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:03
25,996
-9
26 Aug 2026, 23:35
26,005
+1
26 Aug 2026, 00:04
26,004
+5
25 Aug 2026, 02:18
25,999
-6
23 Aug 2026, 15:28
26,005
+4
22 Aug 2026, 00:17
26,001
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.3%
avg views ÷ 25,906 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,340
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
25 (8 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
88,040
Reactions total
2,538
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
568
Videos
138
Links
164
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,385 reactions across 25 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,857
29.1%
👍
1,734
27.2%
❤
1,201
18.8%
😁
1,033
16.2%
🤣
188
2.94%
🗿
69
1.08%
👏
26
0.407%
🐳
21
0.329%
🤔
21
0.329%
🤯
19
0.298%
🆒
15
0.235%
🎉
15
0.235%
👀
15
0.235%
👎
15
0.235%
😢
12
0.188%
❤🔥
11
0.172%
🤡
11
0.172%
😭
9
0.141%
🙉
8
0.125%
👨💻
7
0.11%
30 further kinds
98
1.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 25 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @physfrompobed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Зачем на дымовых трубах спираль?
На промышленных дымовых трубах можно увидеть спиральные металлические конструкции, похожие на огромную винтовую резьбу. Это не просто промышленный дизайн: у них есть вполне конкретная функция.
Когда ветер обтекает цилиндрическую трубу, поток отрывается от её поверхности, и за трубой начинают попеременно срываться вихри — то с одной, то с другой стороны. Так возникает вихревая дорожк…
Друзья! 19 сентября в 14:00 приходите на ВДНХ, в павильон Космос!
Буду читать лекцию "Достижения современной физики". Поговорим про квантовые компьютеры, метаметериалы, экзопланеты, гравитационные волны и многое другое, что войдет в учебники физики и сильно изменит нашу жизнь в будущем!
Участие бесплатное, нужно только зарегистрироваться тут: https://cosmos-vdnh.timepad.ru/event/4186307/
Визуализация NASA
Это геоид — поверхность одинакового гравитационного потенциала, примерно та форма, которую принял бы мировой океан, если убрать течения, приливы и ветер, под действием вращения Земли и её неоднородной гравитации.
На видео рельеф специально гиперболизирован в 10 000 раз. В реальности отклонения геоида от идеального эллипсоида составляют примерно от −106 до +85 метров при радиусе Земли около 6371 км…
Магнитная доска
Вы наверняка видели детскую магнитную доску для рисования: по ней можно рисовать стилусом и стирать нарисованное бегунком. Как устроена эта доска?
Её поверхность состоит из шестиугольных ячеек, где в вязкой жидкости плавают чёрные намагниченные частички. На стилусе и бегунке для стирания также установлены магниты. Они притягивают частички соответственно вверх или вниз, отчего ячейка окрашивается в ч…
Поздравляем с первым днём осени и первым учебным днём!
Желаем, чтобы энергия никогда не стремилась к нулю, любопытство только набирало ускорение, а тяга к новым знаниям оставалась постоянной величиной.
Пусть учёба даётся легко, сложные задачи находят решения, а новый учебный год принесёт много интересных открытий.
С 1 сентября!
Невозможное рядом: ботинок и бутерброд одновременно соблюдают свои законы физики.
😁316🤣139👍20❤16🔥12🗿8❤🔥2👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @physfrompobed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какова масса воды в обычном кучевом облаке размером около 1 × 1 × 1 км?
около 500 кг9%
около 5 тонн26%
около 500 тонн36%
около 50 000 тонн29%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
QWERTY @qwerty_live · 21,603 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Thoisoi @TheThoisoi · 45,321 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
Космос просто @cosmosprosto · 60,877 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Vert Dider @vertdider · 26,961 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
Вселенная Плюс @vselennayaplus · 83,091 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия @kosmos149 · 87,819 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин @nezemnoy_telegram · 96,287 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Химия – Просто @ChemistryEasy · 25,167 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Мудреныч @moodrenych · 25,461 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Грег @gregjgeek · 23,197 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 September 2026
Весёлый Электронщик @radiolubitelTV · 21,248 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
#энерголикбез @operby · 35,750 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ @zems · 48,698 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
GEO @GEOSHOW · 77,794 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
ПостНаука @postnauka · 21,797 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Dagon @dagon_official · 25,717 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Физика от Побединского” (@physfrompobed), 25,906 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physfrompobed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.