Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day

Channel

NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day

@apod_telegram

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

35,184subscribers

+331 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001955059590
TypeChannel
Username@apod_telegram
DescriptionTo find and view past APODs, tap here: t.me/apodQA/3 NASA's APOD presence in Telegram: 🌐apod.nasa.gov Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/apod_telegram

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,85335,18435,018.56 August 2026 — 34,853 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,853 subscribers6 August 2026 — 34,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,863 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,856 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,885 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,883 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,892 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,002 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,017 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,030 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,026 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,040 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,041 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,056 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,065 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,060 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,041 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,042 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,037 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,053 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,067 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,073 subscribers31 August 2026 — 35,085 subscribers1 September 2026 — 35,089 subscribers2 September 2026 — 35,093 subscribers3 September 2026 — 35,103 subscribers5 September 2026 — 35,104 subscribers8 September 2026 — 35,073 subscribers11 September 2026 — 35,069 subscribers13 September 2026 — 35,103 subscribers14 September 2026 — 35,132 subscribers16 September 2026 — 35,159 subscribers19 September 2026 — 35,174 subscribers25 September 2026 — 35,184 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +331. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,803–35,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:3635,184+10
19 Sept 2026, 01:0035,174+15
16 Sept 2026, 19:0035,159+27
14 Sept 2026, 22:0135,132+29
13 Sept 2026, 05:1635,103+34
11 Sept 2026, 08:0035,069-4
8 Sept 2026, 12:0235,073-31
5 Sept 2026, 04:1835,104+1
3 Sept 2026, 12:1835,103+10
2 Sept 2026, 04:3435,093+4
1 Sept 2026, 07:2735,089+4
31 Aug 2026, 05:3735,085+12
30 Aug 2026, 04:4735,073+6
29 Aug 2026, 07:1635,067+14
28 Aug 2026, 07:0435,053+16
27 Aug 2026, 07:0435,037-5
26 Aug 2026, 03:4335,042+1
25 Aug 2026, 03:5335,041-19
23 Aug 2026, 19:4435,060-5
22 Aug 2026, 06:0535,065first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 35,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,550
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held132 (27 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total272,845
Reactions total3,922
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,100
Videos
≈409
Links
≈11,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,531 reactions across 129 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,34762.7%
🔥97511.4%
🤩7028.23%
👾5426.35%
👍4575.36%
🤔2643.09%
🤯1021.20%
😱871.02%
😁500.586%
👎50.059%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,780 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 04:29 UTC575 views23 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 28 Cosmic Latte: The Average Color of the Universe Image Color Credit: Karl Glazebrook & Ivan Baldry (JHU) What color is the universe? More precisely, if the entire sky were smeared out, what color would the final mix be? This whimsical question came up when trying to determine what stars are commonplace in nearby galaxies. The answer, depicted here, is a conditionally perceived shade of beige. In co…

🤔11❤6🔥5😁1

27 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC≈1,260 views36 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Tomorrow's picture: cosmic move

❤25🤔6😱4🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 04:29 UTC≈2,540 views105 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 27 Andromeda before Photoshop Image Credit: Kees Scherer What does the Andromeda galaxy really look like? The featured image shows how our Milky Way Galaxy's closest major galactic neighbor really appears in a long exposure through Earth's busy skies and with a digital camera that introduces normal imperfections. The picture is a stack of 223 images, each a 300 second exposure, taken from a garden ob…

❤74🔥17🤩6😱6👍2

26 Sept 2026, 23:00 UTC≈2,400 views38 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Tomorrow's picture: before and after

🤔21🔥7❤6😁3👾1

26 Sept 2026, 04:29 UTC≈3,090 views69 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 26 Mirrored Meteor and Milky Way Image Credit & Copyright: Jeff Dai (TWAN) On August 15, this perseid meteor streaked through night skies over the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos at La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain. The bright and colorful meteor trail was captured next to the central Milky Way, whose dark interstellar dust clouds and luminous starlight reach above the horizon. In the foregrou…

❤62👍3👾2🔥2

25 Sept 2026, 21:04 UTC≈2,950 views43 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Tomorrow's picture: reflections on a starry night

❤33🔥10

25 Sept 2026, 04:29 UTC≈3,530 views87 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 25 Globular Cluster Omega Centauri Image Credit & Copyright: Javier O. Cadenas Parra Globular star cluster Omega Centauri packs about 10 million stars much older than the Sun into a volume some 150 light-years in diameter. Also known as NGC 5139, at a distance of 15,000 light-years it's the largest and brightest of 200 or so known globular clusters that roam the halo of our Milky Way galaxy. Though m…

❤60🔥23👍4

24 Sept 2026, 04:30 UTC≈4,040 views85 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 24 The Ghosts of Five Supernovas Image Credit & Copyright: Stephane Vetter, Yann Sainty Text: Cecilia Chirenti (NASA GSFC, UMCP, CRESST II) The ghosts of five supernovas haunt this extraordinary image, acquired at Oukaïmeden Observatory in Morocco with approximately 200 hours of observations. It shows a large patch of the sky, equivalent to the area of one thousand full moons tiled together, in the c…

❤59🔥19👍6🤩1

23 Sept 2026, 22:57 UTC≈3,450 views23 reactionsread 28 September 2026

‼️APOD's email for image submissions has changed. Please see: APOD Submissions.

👾12❤6👍5

23 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC≈3,810 views38 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Poll

Why did the impact produce a large cold spot beyond the visible crater?

  1. The impact heated regolith across the surrounding surface.13%
  2. The impact compressed regolith, increasing its thermal conductivity.16%
  3. The impact disturbed regolith, making it less dense and less able to retain heat.45%
  4. The impact vaporized surface material, exposing colder rock beneath.25%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤20👾8😁4👍3🤔3

23 Sept 2026, 04:29 UTC≈4,180 views83 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 23 A New Lunar Crater: McGetchin Image Credit: NASA/GSFC/Intuitive Machines Text: Keighley Rockcliffe (NASA GSFC, UMBC CSST, CRESST II) A once-in-a-lifetime crater has appeared on the Moon! A comet or asteroid roughly the size of a humpback whale (approximately 10-20 meters, 30-60 feet) crashed into the Moon sometime between April and May of 2024. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), with its mont…

❤49🔥22👍4👾3🤯3🤩1😱1

22 Sept 2026, 04:29 UTC≈4,770 views96 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

2026 September 22 Chance Triple Alignment: Plane, Space Station, Sun Image Credit & Copyright: Petr Horalek / Inst. Physics Opava This shot captured an unexpected silhouette. Which is it? It isn't the sunspots, the small dark regions caused by concentrated magnetic fields visible around the Sun's bright disk. Sunspots typically last for weeks and were expected, since these spots were seen previously. It isn’t t…

❤66👾8🔥7🤩7👍2🤔2🤯2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @apod_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@apod_telegram edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 19 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz319 voters

Why did the impact produce a large cold spot beyond the visible crater?

  1. The impact heated regolith across the surrounding surface.13%
  2. The impact compressed regolith, increasing its thermal conductivity.16%
  3. The impact disturbed regolith, making it less dense and less able to retain heat.45%
  4. The impact vaporized surface material, exposing colder rock beneath.25%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Sept 2026, 18:03 UTCAnonymous Poll433 voters

Have you ever seen zodiacal light? 👀 Tell us about it in the comments! 💬

  1. Yes, and I knew what it was 🤯15%
  2. Yes, but I didn't know then 🎓15%
  3. I've looked for it, but never saw it 💔16%
  4. No, I've never seen it 🙁54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz377 voters

Which observation provides the strongest evidence that M64 experienced a past galaxy merger?

  1. Its spiral arms contain many young stars.17%
  2. Its inner and outer gas rotate in opposite directions.46%
  3. Its central region contains a prominent dust lane.18%
  4. Its disk contains regions of active star formation.19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Sept 2026, 23:01 UTCAnonymous Quiz382 voters

What determines how much of Venus appears illuminated in this image?

  1. Its position relative to Earth and the Sun.44%
  2. Its distance from the Sun alone.14%
  3. The brightness of Venus's cloud layers.27%
  4. The thickness of Earth's atmosphere.15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz382 voters

Based on the text, what is the specific relationship between M83 and Centaurus A?

  1. They are actively merging.15%
  2. They belong to the same galactic group43%
  3. M83 orbits Centaurus A21%
  4. Centaurus A is a distant background galaxy20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Sept 2026, 16:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz407 voters

Why is Pluto shown in enhanced color rather than its natural visible colors?

  1. To make its surface temperature easier to measure.15%
  2. To distinguish regions with different surface compositions.51%
  3. To reveal features hidden beneath Pluto's surface.24%
  4. To make Pluto appear similar to other dwarf planets.10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

NASA
@nasapictures · 25,136
#1
Astronomy
@Astrofenomen · 5,326
#2
Astro Wonders
@thewonderofspace · 7,666
#3
Astronomy Picture Of the Day
@apodChannel · 4,313
#4
NASA Breaking News
@nasabreakingnews · 2,141
#5
NASA News
@Nasa_News · 2,680
#6
Astrophotography
@astrophoto · 1,087
#7
Astronomy Picture of the Day
@nasa_apod · 15,369
#8
Space Times
@Space_Timess · 3,242
#9
🚀 Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apodhub · 560
#10
Astronomy/Physics Books
@AstroPhysicsBookss · 14,282
#11
Earth, Galaxy, Universe
@ourearthgalaxy · 11,622
#12
Physics
@physics · 33,183
#13
Space
@space_en · 6,493
#14
Kosmo [ENG]
@kosmo_eng · 6,260
#15
Infinity-Science
@InfinityScienceX · 2,956
#16
SpaceX Feed
@SpaceXFeed · 4,432
#17
Science in telegram
@science · 120,230
#18
Outer Space 🚀
@thespace_tg · 10,310
#19
NASA | Физика | Астрономия
@kosmos149 · 87,819
#20
Dark Space
@darkspace · 7,593
#21
Astronomy Learners
@spacemathsphysicslearners · 2,931
#22
Science Strangeries
@Sci_Strangeries · 1,217
#23
National Geographic
@NatGeoSociety · 37,493
#24
Wonderful World
@tgwondworld · 3,861
#25
Discovery 🌍
@tg_discovery · 18,441
#26
Mysteries of our planet
@Mysteriesofourplanet · 5,484
#27
Physics
@physics_tg · 12,124
#28
Nature 🌎
@Nature · 74,698
#29
Tomorrow Technology
@TheTomorrowTechnology · 9,417
#30
Interesting facts
@intfactsen · 22,591
#31
Science and facts
@tgscience_facts · 34,353
#32
@tourism
@journeys · 25,074
#33
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE ™ 💡
@General_KnowledgeTM · 69,163
#34
Deep Sky | Космос & Астрономия
@Deep_Kosmos · 9,843
#35
Space Room | Космос
@inSpaceRoom · 10,857
#36
Science4all - Best Scientific Channel
@scientific · 10,578
#37
Interesting Engineering
@ieofficial · 65,952
#38
The Art Vault
@painting · 41,439
#39
Katya’s space news
@katline_grey · 668
#40
☆꧁ Nαƚυɾҽ Iʂ Lιƚ ꧂☆
@NatureIsLit · 4,947
#41
Science Memes
@science_memez · 4,637
#42
Real Nature
@tgrealnature · 30,396
#43
Discovery Science
@s_discovery · 9,566
#44
Buzz 📚 History
@buzzhistory · 51,062
#45
Technology Review
@technology_tg · 8,230
#46
Crazy Earth
@ukrab · 4,597
#47
the Facts
@mind_tg · 11,218
#48
رویدادهای آسمان
@heavenevents · 1,683
#49
NASA Italian Channel
@NasaITA · 971
#50
AstroSpace.it
@AstroSpace_it · 10,638
#51
Discovery Science 🧬
@discoveryb · 5,516
#52
Physics Books
@Phy_bok · 11,921
#53
Earth Curated 🌎
@earthcurated · 28,058
#54
SpaceX
@spacex_rus · 16,952
#55
ناسا فارسی توئیتر | NASA Farsi
@nasa_farsi_twitter · 7,582
#56
James Webb Space Telescope
@JamesWebbTelescope · 11,630
#57
SpaceX | Starship News
@StarshipNewsLive · 18,143
#58
Rings & Moons
@RingsandMoons · 5,714
#59
Living Ocean
@livingocean · 3,693
#60
Geography and History Facts
@geographyandhistorfacts · 7,218
#61
International Geographic
@internationalgeographic · 39,800
#62
Маша и Медведица ✨
@astromasha · 1,256
#63
Wildlife
@wildlifen · 16,010
#64
Записки астронома
@astrozapiski · 3,465
#65
Астрономия | NASA
@nasaspace_tg · 12,051
#66
Why?
@why_eng · 19,033
#67
Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика
@ShklovskyStr · 19,116
#68
Olympiad Arena-IOQM,RMO,INMO
@OlympiadArena · 6,911
#69
E =mc² / Albert Einstein
@MilkyWayAlbertEinstein · 3,351
#70
Science News
@Science_News_Facts_Updates_daily · 13,280
#71
KOINOT SIRLARI
@astronomiya · 2,761
#72
JAXA🇯🇵 | CNSA🇨🇳
@JAXA_news · 431
#73
Открытый космос
@ourspacelive · 3,807
#74
فضاء تيسلا 🪐
@Space_tesla · 1,233
#75
science videos , facts , news
@science_cha · 3,588
#76
Japan Aesthetic
@japan_japanese_anime_movies_lang · 10,775
#77
DOGS Community
@dogs · 7,065,215
#78

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NASA
@nasapictures · 25,136
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Physics
@physics · 33,183
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
Sec 1 | Integrated Science | Mr.Ahmed ElBasha
@scimrahmedelbasha · 25,768
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 13 September 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия
@kosmos149 · 87,819
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Science in telegram
@science · 120,230
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
vajiram ravi Current Affairs Gk
@vajiram_ravi_Current_Gk · 28,977
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
Ministry of Health (MOH) Singapore
@MOHsingapore · 21,220
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day” (@apod_telegram), 35,184 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/apod_telegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.