乳包界又出新梗:徐竟培 https://x.com/i/status/2085682370724954521

Channel
推特高雅壬與菟子
@ttsmr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,019subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001385946446 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ttsmr |
| Created | 29 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ttsmr |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 2,019 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 2,021 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 2,023 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 2,023 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.79%
- avg views ÷ 2,019 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 96.7
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.71%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,030 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 57s
- Average length
- 1m 44s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtu.be/z8RljOVwFPY?si=4ffbZwHOsEEN-2tw
北京已采取报复性措施,中美贸易战再燃。 https://youtu.be/sdxps0q7Gik?si=lOzVYj58E2tyFtod
一群蒙面亲巴勒斯坦暴徒出现在一国党与宝琳·汉森的见面会场外,试图恐吓胆敢参加的普通澳大利亚人。 同样的剧本,同样的口号,同样的道德姿态。他们头戴阿拉伯头巾,挥舞着旗帜,高喊着所有进门的人都是种族主义者。在维多利亚州,如果保守派人士和平集会,激进分子就会出现,大声叫嚣、恐吓和抹黑。https://www.rebelnews.com/masked_pro_palestine_mob_tries_to_shut_down_one_nation_meet_and_greet?utm_campaign=ay_hansonprotest_080526&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
男人可以风流,不可以下流。王菊花永远不懂的道理
民主党集团继续和中共勾兑,拿美国人的工作换廉价的血汗劳工产品。 https://x.com/i/status/2084615124547965159
《拯救美国法案》48-50被拦下,共和党反对票:Thom Tillis、Lisa Murkowski、Mitch McConnell 和 Susan Collins
事实证明,女权进步的绝后效率的确是比计划生育还要好的。当初共产党应该听话的😁,可惜这是一个嗜血的暴力团伙,不给自己弄点国际舆论压力那是不肯罢休的。
有点黑色幽默了
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
0.58元玩具逼万亿巨头动用法务你以为华为赢了 #涨知识 #品牌公关 #商誉分析 #A股 🔗 喜羊羊(资源分享) (@enoch4306)
🤣3
为什么厕所不应该分男女?嫌女孩被强奸还不够多是不是?厕所之所以分男女不就是为了保护女孩子吗?民主党这帮人都疯了! https://youtu.be/HyPd8HCAAhA?si=xETkQIjNPCzhvD_1 本编认为:民主党人已经被极左叙事绑架,我们应该抛弃他们。
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ttsmr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 799,654 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ttsmr named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“推特高雅壬與菟子” (@ttsmr), 2,019 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ttsmr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.