转自https://x.com/i/status/2085569974589153614

Channel
中文圈左派观察日记
@zunshiyulu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,546subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001311518884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zunshiyulu |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zunshiyulu |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 2,546 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 2,549 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 2,550 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 2,552 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 2,554 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 2,558 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 2,557 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 2,552 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 2,550 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:09 | 2,551 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 2,550 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 2,548 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 2,549 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
43 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 11 | 25.6% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 20.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 🤮 | 6 | 14.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 6.98% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
们Amber女士喜欢写这种性别对立暴论就是为了博流量的炒作狗罢了😁
🤣4🤡1😁1
这个频道挺有意思的,理解能力是不是持续高强度上网给衰退到老年痴呆的地步了,简简单单说个问题就给我扣上帽子,说别人认知能力有问题首先检查一下自己是不是认知能力有问题再来评价别人
❤2
就是这样,是个正常人见到伤者就要去救,因为凶手是少数族裔就是天龙人不救伤者反而因为种族歧视罪名铐起伤者那真的是神人,换做是中世纪英国政府都要没了
👍2
这几天没怎么发消息,说实话英国是最傻逼无比的国家是没错的,把手铐铐在伤者这种事情换做是正常人也被震惊一万年
👍2
左逼玩连坐真的熟练,看来直升机扔的还是太少了。皮大帅也就图一乐,赤柬和大健身玩连坐屠杀左逼才是真实力派。
沙东龙批韩熙林炫耀他的泔水套餐😁
💊2😁1
本来没什么心情忙频道事情的,你这个傻逼倒好,跳上来发出这种发言,不得不说环境对傻逼太好了😅
这TM什么理性中立客观发言?笔者默罕默德建议拉去矫正机构服役去
🤣2
然而判决书里只字未提“反击家暴”,无非就是女拳师们一张嘴乱说。 只可惜你们再怎么打拳,也一辈子都是y染公跨屌子。
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤮6😁2💩1🤣1
下作炒作狗为了这丁点儿流量连全家都不要了,唉
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zunshiyulu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ruters0615 · 25,589
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中文圈左派观察日记” (@zunshiyulu), 2,546 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zunshiyulu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.