Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 52 days, net -553. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,176–53,895 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Sept 2026, 09:35
53,259
-115
17 Sept 2026, 13:19
53,374
-13
15 Sept 2026, 09:19
53,387
-14
13 Sept 2026, 15:37
53,401
-22
11 Sept 2026, 17:42
53,423
-33
9 Sept 2026, 01:19
53,456
-32
5 Sept 2026, 18:21
53,488
-22
3 Sept 2026, 18:00
53,510
-5
2 Sept 2026, 08:04
53,515
-12
31 Aug 2026, 07:04
53,527
-16
30 Aug 2026, 08:23
53,543
-8
29 Aug 2026, 08:07
53,551
-8
28 Aug 2026, 09:03
53,559
-12
27 Aug 2026, 09:25
53,571
-4
26 Aug 2026, 10:46
53,575
-9
25 Aug 2026, 08:42
53,584
-5
24 Aug 2026, 10:22
53,589
-1
22 Aug 2026, 21:08
53,590
+3
21 Aug 2026, 13:27
53,587
-1
20 Aug 2026, 14:12
53,588
first reading
Engagement
365 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 53,259 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,370
191 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.522%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
191
of 365 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 160 of 191 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
365 (31 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
1,216,310
Reactions total
5,572
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
1m 04s
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,249 reactions across 292 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,522
31.3%
❤
2,098
18.7%
😁
1,848
16.4%
💔
1,774
15.8%
🤬
709
6.30%
👎
460
4.09%
🖕
316
2.81%
🍌
273
2.43%
👏
186
1.65%
💯
58
0.516%
🆒
5
0.044%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 304 of the 365 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 365 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برگهایم!
دانشمندای ژاپنی راهی رو پیدا کردن که بتونن کروموزوم اضافهای که باعث سندروم داون میشه رو حذف کنن!
این روش اگه مقیاس پیدا کنه، میتونه باعث بشه سندروم داون قبل از زایمان درمان بشه و بچه سالم به دنیا بیاد!
@trueproxy | اتصال به پروکسی
#پروکسی #ایران #فیلترشکن #proxy #کانفیگ
✨ قدرتمندترین مهره مار (اصل و تضمینی) ✨
اگر به دنبال تغییر اساسی در زندگی، روابط و کسبوکار خود هستید، این مهره مار بینظیر بهترین انتخاب برای شماست:
💰 افزایش چشمگیر رزق، روزی و برکت در مال
❤️ جذب فوقالعاده جنس مخالف و محبوبیت خاص در جمع
🧿 باطلالسحر قوی و دفع هرگونه چشمزخم و انرژی منفی
🍀 شانسِ برد بالا در تمامی امور و معاملات
🔙 بازگشت سریع معشوق و تسخیر قلب همسر
🔒 زبانبند بسیار قوی و مؤثر در برابر مخالفان
…
اینکه میگن هفته اوّل دانشگاه رو هیچکسی نمیره، از افسانههای قدیمیه؛ الآن اَتمسفر جوری دوستدختر دوستپسری شده که از یه ماه قبل اونجا کَمپ زدن.
https://t.me/proxy?server=s02.neo-trading.org&port=443&secret=ee6ec9f7e082baf2397b450727ce78447e6f7a6f6e2e7275
https://t.me/proxy?server=s02.neo-trading.org&port=443&secret=ee6ec9f7e082baf2397b450727ce78447e6f7a6f6e2e7275
https://t.me/proxy?server=bale.foltmeingop.co.uk&po…
نسخه جدید تلگرام اصلی منتشر شد : ☄️
اکانت پریمیوم رایگان شده 💥✅
پروکسی های اختصاصی اومده 🔗🌐
هوش مصنوعی برای تولید عکس و فیلم گذاشته ▶️⌨️📸
کاملا امن دانلود شده از فروشگاه گوگل 🛒💯
همه نصب کنین خیلی تغییر کرده و بهتر شده 🤩#توصیه_میکنم
تو سختترین روزای زندگیمون وقتی تازه نقل مکان کرده بودیم تهران و بابا ورشکست شده بود و زندگی رو از صفر شروع کرده بودیم و مثل قبل نمیتونست هرچی که میخوایم برامون بخره؛ عمه هرسال اول مهر برامون کلی لوازمالتحریر میفرستاد، دقیقا عین همونایی که برای بچههای خودش میخرید. منم امروز اینا رو خریدم که بفرستم برای سهتا بچه تو مناطق محروم، دقیقا چیزهایی رو خریدم که اگر قرار بود برای بچه خودم بخرم انتخاب میکردم، چون معتقد…
.
مجردها فکر میکنن طلاق دکمه داره
یه دکمه قرمز بزرگ براق که تا از چیزی اذیت شدی بکوبی روش و یهو بوم!اون آدم و زندگی وخاطرات و نظر خونواده و جامعه ومشکلات جدایی دود شه بره هوا و بجاش امنیت و آرامش برات بیاره
نه عزیزانم طلاق از سخت ترین و بدترین تصمیمات آدمیه که "مجبور" میشه بگیره
حالا فکر کن اگر بچه داشته باشی دیگه چه مصیبتی بشه
https://t.me/proxy?server=91.234.147.8.server-space52.info&port=2020&secret=AAAAAAAAAAAAA…
۳–۱ باختیم به ازبکستان؛ حقوق ماهانه ۱۵ میلیاردی قلعهنویی هم سر جاشه!
اگه شما جای فدراسیون بودید، بعد از این نتیجه چه میکردید؟
🔹 قرارداد رو فسخ میکردید19%
🔹 فرصت میدادید جبران کنه4%
🔹 اول فدراسیون رو عوض میکردید77%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 365 posts we hold for @TrueProxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
۳–۱ باختیم به ازبکستان؛ حقوق ماهانه ۱۵ میلیاردی قلعهنویی هم سر جاشه!
اگه شما جای فدراسیون بودید، بعد از این نتیجه چه میکردید؟
🔹 قرارداد رو فسخ میکردید19%
🔹 فرصت میدادید جبران کنه4%
🔹 اول فدراسیون رو عوض میکردید77%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 365 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 75 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@TrueProxy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@trueprocy named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
توییت پروتو TweetProto @tweetproto · 34,012 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 3 September 2026
لئون پروکسی Lion MTProto @Lion_MTProto · 40,520 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026
پروکسی پر سرعت | proxy @parsaproxy · 30,859 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
KingProxy - پروکسی ضد فیلتر @kingproxiy · 37,855 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
Mtproto @mtproto70 · 25,023 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 15 September 2026
Bear Proxies @BearProxies · 54,570 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 23 August 2026
پروکسی قوی | Proxy Qavi @proxy_ghavy · 94,107 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
proxy Open Twitter پروکسی توییت @twwoiet · 106,412 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
Telegram Proxies @Get_MTProto · 73,926 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 August 2026
Proxy | پوشش اخبار {پروکسی} @BadProxies · 51,321 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
King Proxy | پروکسی @kingporoxy · 145,592 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
خبرفوری|ARA PROXY|پروکسی @ARA_PROXY · 77,171 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی @NoteProxy · 144,576 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
طب سنتی @SONATi_TB · 48,976 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Land Proxy | پروکسی @landporoxy · 180,279 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ترو پروکسی True Proxy” (@TrueProxy), 53,259 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrueProxy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.